Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:04 PM Sep 2012

Foreign policy at forefront is a Romney hurdle

Foreign policy at forefront is a Romney hurdle

By STEVE PEOPLES and THOMAS BEAUMONT

<...>

It did — and at a bad time for the GOP hopeful. Momentum in the race is on President Barack Obama's side and Republicans are fretting over the state of their nominee's campaign...Romney is publicly confident and on Friday dismissed a new flurry of polls showing him behind...by late Friday, a new poll by The New York Times and CBS News found that Romney had lost his longstanding edge to Obama on who voters say is most likely to restore the economy and create jobs. And the latest surveys from NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist Poll showed Obama with a slight edge in Florida, Ohio and Virginia.

Untested on the international stage and with limited foreign policy experience, Romney staked his entire rationale for his candidacy on the notion that he can fix the nation's dour economy given his decades of work in the private sector. He doubled down on that strategy when he chose as his running mate House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, a 42-year-old Wisconsin congressman with little international affairs experience.

Then, the unrest in Egypt and Libya flared, and Romney accused Obama of apologizing for America, his first statement mischaracterizing events in Cairo before all the facts were known, including that a beloved U.S. ambassador to Libya had died...Several Republicans, including Arizona Sen. John McCain, have urged Romney to give a major foreign affairs speech laying out his critique of Obama. But the campaign has no plans for any major policy speeches that break major new ground before the debates.

Romney's foreign policy bobble was the latest in a series of recent missteps. He stumbled through a summer trip abroad that had been intended to show he could lead on the world stage. Then, he became the first Republican since 1952 to accept his party's nomination without mentioning war, giving Democrats an opening to criticize and raising eyebrows among Republicans. Romney also took heat for actor Clint Eastwood's rambling convention appearance.

- more -

http://news.yahoo.com/foreign-policy-forefront-romney-hurdle-074217550--election.html

(emphasis added)

Seriously, are they delusional? Mitt's campaign slogan is "vague is safe, and if vague doesn't work, lie!"

The article reads like one of those pieces trying to frame a comeback, except it forgot to mention the plan.

Summary: He has no experience, and despite some major setbacks, he really sucks and has no plan...well, except spending a lot of money on ad.

Mitt is screwed, and forget asking for policy specifics.

Trust Mitt: Releasing his tax returns would be "damaging" and policy details would be "suicidal"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021151118

That's just not how Mitt rolls when he isn't going full blunder.

"Romney was faced with an important leadership test last night. He failed spectacularly."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021325813

Mitt Romney goes off the deep end with new defense of his embassy attack
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021342118

Romney on GMA "I Plan on Pulling a Palin During Debates"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021342061

How about a "major foreign affairs speech"?

Romney campaign quickly distances itself from Mitt's statement of support for Obama's Iran policy

<...>

Confused? Well, this doesn't clear it up:

The Romney campaign did not offer an on-the-record response for the apparent discrepancy in message and position between Mr. Romney and his top foreign policy advisers. But they privately maintain there is no change in policy and point to the portion of the ABC News interview where he says that Iran should not have “the capacity to terrorize the world.”

They also said Stephanopoulos was wrong to say Obama's policy was the same as Romney's. Of course, Stephanopoulos wasn't the only one to make that "mistake." Mitt Romney did as well. Three different times.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131846/-Romney-campaign-quickly-distances-itself-from-Mitt-s-statement-of-support-for-Obama-s-Iran-policy

Yeah, right!



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Foreign policy at forefront is a Romney hurdle (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2012 OP
Laughing aside: ProSense Sep 2012 #1
Well, at least ProSense Sep 2012 #2

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
1. Laughing aside:
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:37 PM
Sep 2012

Think about the Presidential campaign thus far. Mitt Romney, aided by the media, staked out an advantage on the issue of the economy based solely on his business background. Nothing else. Being CEO of Bain was the experience that allegedly qualified him to be President.

That fascade is being torn down, and he no longer has the advantage.

The Morning Plum: Has Obama neutralized Romney’s advantage on the economy?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021334354

Breaking News: Obama Erases Romney's Edge on Economy (NYT email)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021345790

Still, look at where this country is relative to world affairs.

The country is still involved in a war in Afghanistan, and somehow a person with limited foreign policy experience, and seemingly no real interest in it outside starting another war, was sold to the American people as a viable candidate to lead this nation.

Does Mitt realize that the economy is more than tax cuts for the rich and rhetoric about job creators?

Reminds me of this from Krugman:

Poles Apart

So on the third leg of his foreign tour, (Mr. Bean) Mitt Romney lavished praise on the Polish economy. It wasn’t quite as big a blooper as his praise for Israel’s single-payer-plus-price controls health care system, but it wasn’t good.

For one thing, Poland has substantially bigger government than the US; in 2007, that is, pre-crisis, the Polish government spent 42 percent of GDP, compared with 37 in the United States. And despite what Romney claimed, there was no obvious trend toward smaller government; Polish spending as a share of GDP was about the same in 2007 as it had been in 2000...and universal health care too.

<...>

So actually Poland’s success suggests that (a) big government isn’t so bad (b) sometimes its good to debase your currency.

Doesn’t anyone tell Romney to do his homework?

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/poles-apart-2/




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Foreign policy at forefro...