Can someone with legal training help me understand this 1st degree theory?

In looking at the paramedic video footage, when the sheriff dept medics show up to remove George Floyd's body from the scene of the crime, before the fire dept's paramedics show up, I'm seeing this as corroborating evidence for a murder one conviction, based on the assailant (Chauvin) and his collaborators "state of mind" at the time of Floyd's death.

Is this sound legal reasoning or am I blowing smoke?

I'm thinking that video footage demonstrates that (1) Chauvin knew already that he had killed George Floyd already, (2) that he called in a friendlier ambulance crew of sheriff deputies who also knew that George Floyd was dead and (3) that they took specific steps to camouflage this from witnesses on scene by (4) putting on the charade of a cursory "check" for pulse (under 2 seconds) all while (5) Chauvin kept on kneeling on his corpse's neck as if he was still restraining him, and (6) later had issued a bogus "died at the hospital" public statement.

Does this elevate the department itself from "a bad trainer and supervisor of cops" to criminal co-conspirators involved in the coverup of a murder?

And does the premeditation of the ambulance ruse demonstrate premeditation of the crime itself?

I've been assuming that the unauthorized restraint of pressing Chauvin's 200 lb. body onto Floyd's neck while he pleaded for his life for 8 minutes alone demonstrates premeditation.