Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe explanation from the NY Times for why they published the Cotton shit is not going well.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
August 20, 1939
Read the thread. People are pissed.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1595 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (24)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The explanation from the NY Times for why they published the Cotton shit is not going well. (Original Post)
DURHAM D
Jun 2020
OP
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)1. To which Dean Baquet nods his head
dalton99a
(81,485 posts)2. All the Authoritarian Propaganda That's Fit to Print
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)3. Quite a record
Hitler
Duranty propping up Stalin and winning a Pulitzer for his efforts
and now Trump and Cotton.
A record to be proud of.
dalton99a
(81,485 posts)4. +1. And Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction. And Hillary's Emails.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)5. Remind me again why we should take the NYT seriously
Ever Again?
Congratulations NYT - youve shit the bed.