General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy do reporters suck at follow up questions
Jake Tapper just had Ben Carson on and asked him about his feelings on NFL players kneeling....Carson gives an answer about how the players need to come out and say that they respect the flag, and military and blah blah blah, and they arent protesting the flag but protesting injustice....And Tapper says thank you instead of a follow up stating that that is what they have already said
Edit: now I am watching MSNBC and Vashir is asking hard follow up questions to a liberal, why cant they do that with a conservative...
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)It is sickening to watch many of the so called interviews.
jrthin
(4,836 posts)the best and the brightest in those positions.
Nature Man
(869 posts)aren't actually reporters.
They're not even news anchors.
They are REALITY TV SHOW HOSTS.
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)Tell that to the ones who were arrested.
They are reporters.
They just suck at their jobs.
apples aren't oranges either.
Horses aren't dogs.
Response to SamKnause (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dem4decades
(11,296 posts)Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)That they are taught that in Journalism school
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)that he wasn't worth arguing with.
New Breed Leader
(624 posts)They're getting paid not to ask follow up questions to conservatives, someone somewhere is paying them not to do it.
I'm convinced of it.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)New Breed Leader
(624 posts)What do you think?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)not listening to the response is a common problem in interviewing. It takes skill to listen and to respond in the moment.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Nobody's paying them to not ask follow-up questions. They aren't intentionally softballing the interviewee (except for Fox). They are just caught up in the direction of what they intended to ask and aren't prepared to go in another direction. Really skilled interviewers are rare. And sometimes (as with a zero like Ben Carson) it just isn't worth the effort because you know you won't get anything interesting out of them anyhow. Tapper is usually pretty good.
New Breed Leader
(624 posts)when they're interviewing liberal guests? That person was right, suddenly they've got nothing BUT followup questions for liberal guests.
It may not be money involved, but SOMETHING stinks. Something's going on.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)while the conservatives just regurgitate the same old talking points and they know that's all they'll ever get from them? Liberals will give them honest answers and conservatives will just give them bullshit. There's no conspiracy, just ineffective interviewers who are too busy thinking about what they're going to say to listen to the interviewees' answers.
New Breed Leader
(624 posts)Still think there's something going on, though.
bamagal62
(3,264 posts)theaocp
(4,241 posts)Why anyone gives a flying fuck about interviewing conservatives is beyond me. Oh, right. Donor money. Gotta dance for the $$$.
Shermann
(7,423 posts)CNN tries to paint conservatives into a corner defending Trump's latest tweet.
This never works and they just go round and round wasting time. The Kellyanne interviews are exasperating.
It borders on being a straw man argument. You can ask tough questions of conservatives that they actually bite on. It just takes some journalistic effort.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)MSNBC only exists because there is a market for news from that perspective, but that doesn't mean the corporate execs are going to give the newscasters free rein.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,862 posts)Listen to the BBC. Not the one in this country, but any of their broadcasts from London. They do not let people get away with not answering a question, and often ask follow up questions.