Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump issued a special executive order on Thursday to wipe away five decades of environmental laws.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2020/06/04/trump-sign-order-waive-environmental-reviews-key-projects/President Trump signed an executive order Thursday instructing agencies to waive long-standing environmental laws to speed up federal approval for new mines, highways, pipelines and other projects given the current economic emergency.
Declaring an economic emergency lets the president invoke a section of federal law allowing action with significant environmental impact without observing normal requirements imposed by laws such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. These laws require agencies to solicit public input on proposed projects and analyze in detail how federal decisions could harm the environment.
EPA won't tighten limits on soot, despite link between air pollution and covid-19 illnesses
In the order, the president said setting aside these requirements would help the nation recover from the economic losses it has suffered since the outbreak of the coronavirus: Unnecessary regulatory delays will deny our citizens opportunities for jobs and economic security, keeping millions of Americans out of work and hindering our economic recovery from the national emergency.
It is unclear how the directive will affect individual projects, especially since developers are often wary of legal challenges they could face from environmental or public interest groups. Jason Bordoff, founding director of Columbia Universitys Center on Global Energy Policy, said in an email that companies would be reluctant to rely on such an executive order, knowing they would later have to prove that they were operating in an emergency.
Jason Redd, an engineer in the power sector based in Alabama, tweeted: Project developer here...there is *NO WAY* I would turn a shovelful of dirt based on this Order.
Declaring an economic emergency lets the president invoke a section of federal law allowing action with significant environmental impact without observing normal requirements imposed by laws such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. These laws require agencies to solicit public input on proposed projects and analyze in detail how federal decisions could harm the environment.
EPA won't tighten limits on soot, despite link between air pollution and covid-19 illnesses
In the order, the president said setting aside these requirements would help the nation recover from the economic losses it has suffered since the outbreak of the coronavirus: Unnecessary regulatory delays will deny our citizens opportunities for jobs and economic security, keeping millions of Americans out of work and hindering our economic recovery from the national emergency.
It is unclear how the directive will affect individual projects, especially since developers are often wary of legal challenges they could face from environmental or public interest groups. Jason Bordoff, founding director of Columbia Universitys Center on Global Energy Policy, said in an email that companies would be reluctant to rely on such an executive order, knowing they would later have to prove that they were operating in an emergency.
Jason Redd, an engineer in the power sector based in Alabama, tweeted: Project developer here...there is *NO WAY* I would turn a shovelful of dirt based on this Order.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 939 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump issued a special executive order on Thursday to wipe away five decades of environmental laws. (Original Post)
CousinIT
Jun 2020
OP
The office of the presidency is way too powerful and should not override at least the house or reps
uponit7771
Jun 2020
#1
Easy. They're numbered consecutively, and his first was #13765 on 1/20/17.
Buns_of_Fire
Jun 2020
#10
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)1. The office of the presidency is way too powerful and should not override at least the house or reps
Laelth
(32,017 posts)2. Well, isn't that special?
Orange scum!
-Laelth
captain queeg
(10,208 posts)3. I hope they're keeping a list of all trumps executive orders
So that Biden can countermand them his first day in office.
tinymontgomery
(2,584 posts)9. That is what I was wondering about
Can't the first day that Biden goes into the White House just sign an
executive order that does away with all of Trumps orders.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,183 posts)10. Easy. They're numbered consecutively, and his first was #13765 on 1/20/17.
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders
Just one blanket recission for everything from 13765 thru whatever his last one will be (he's currently at 13926, as of this writing). Talk about a backhanded slap across those fishy lips...
That having been said, I don't think that'll happen. There may (believe it or not) be a few in there that have some merit. But you can bet that each and every one of them will be gone over with a fine-toorh comb.
Just one blanket recission for everything from 13765 thru whatever his last one will be (he's currently at 13926, as of this writing). Talk about a backhanded slap across those fishy lips...
That having been said, I don't think that'll happen. There may (believe it or not) be a few in there that have some merit. But you can bet that each and every one of them will be gone over with a fine-toorh comb.
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)4. Kick
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)5. Can lawsuits stop him?
2naSalit
(86,647 posts)7. For at least a few months...
it can't go into effect under litigation unless the judge allows it.
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)6. The Dems need to issue a warning that these laws will be restored and any infringements dealt with.