Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,898 posts)
Wed Jun 24, 2020, 07:16 AM Jun 2020

Report: Michigan hospitals shorted $130K per COVID-19 patient in federal aid

It was meant to be a financial booster shot, a way to help hospitals and health care systems survive the economic onslaught that COVID-19 brought.

But a new report analyzing how federal coronavirus relief money was distributed shows stark disparities in which states got the biggest portions of $175 billion in aid from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

Hospitals in the states hardest hit by the virus in March and April — New York, New Jersey, Michigan, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania — got the least amount of federal support per patient, according to a 17-page report released Tuesday by U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

States with the fewest cases got the most federal aid per confirmed case of COVID-19.

Michigan got almost $130,000 less per patient than the national average, according to the report, which analyzed CARES Act funds and coronavirus case counts as of April 10.

While the national average in federal assistance per patient was $160,286, Michigan’s allotment was just $31,045 per patient.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2020/06/24/michigan-gets-less-per-patient-than-other-states-federal-cares-act-covid-relief/3246835001/?utm_campaign=snd-autopilot
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Michigan hospitals shorted $130K per COVID-19 patient in federal aid (Original Post) demmiblue Jun 2020 OP
Outrageous soothsayer Jun 2020 #1
Swing states that are trending blue, and blue states? BComplex Jun 2020 #2
To the Democrats. Please understand maxrandb Jun 2020 #3
This! nt Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2020 #5
Outrageous! Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2020 #4
Apparently, the distribution of funds was based on 2019 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements: demmiblue Jun 2020 #7
Ugh! Thanks for the clarification. nt Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2020 #8
So claw some of that taxpayer money back from States like ND. Freethinker65 Jun 2020 #9
Defund welfare red states! roamer65 Jun 2020 #10
Why does it cost $160,000 to treat a patient? greenjar_01 Jun 2020 #6

maxrandb

(15,360 posts)
3. To the Democrats. Please understand
Wed Jun 24, 2020, 08:13 AM
Jun 2020

You can not give ANYTHING to this criminal cabul! NOTHING!

No matter how much Moscow Mitch and Steve "please punch me in my smirking face" Mnuchin tells you how "bipartisan" their intentions are.

There should not be one more fucking taxpayer dollar given to these pricks by any type of "compromise" legislation. NOT ONE FUCKING DIME!!!!

The only way I would do it is with a joint account that requires the signature of the Speaker of the House to countersign any expenditure.

If they don't agree with those terms, you just tell them to come back and see you when the Dow hits 1000.

demmiblue

(36,898 posts)
7. Apparently, the distribution of funds was based on 2019 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements:
Wed Jun 24, 2020, 09:01 AM
Jun 2020
10Figure 3. Data fromHHSB.Initial Distribution Did Not Account for COVID-19 Cases and Greatest Need In addition to the initial delays and confusion, the first $30 billion tranche of emergency financial relief to hospitals was based upon 2019 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements. This formula did not factor in whether a medical facility was in a hot spot area for COVID-19 and also excluded many rural hospitals.32As a result, the first general distribution payments contained massive inequities. Areas hit hardest by the virus and in greatest need of funding to stabilize their finances received many times less per COVID-19 patient than others.


It is a completely incompetent administration. New Jersey received $16,843 per patient, while North Dakota received $327,570.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Michigan hospital...