Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 736 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have the Supremes ruled yet? n/t (Original Post)
malaise
Jun 2020
OP
There was only one case today, Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2020
#3
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)1. Don't think so. I'm nervous of course
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)2. Here's a trump win
Link to tweet
?s=21
In a victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court ruled that immigrants whose requests for asylum were rejected in bare-bone summary proceedings can't contest the denials in federal court. The decision will affect thousands of asylum seekers.https://nyti.ms/3ibKvT4
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,355 posts)3. There was only one case today, Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/25/supreme-court-upholds-trump-administration-removing-asylum-seekers/3087251001/
The Supreme Court handed a green light Thursday to the Trump administration in its effort to speed up the removal of those seeking asylum.
The court ruled that asylum-seekers claiming fear of persecution abroad do not have to be given a federal court hearing before quick removal from the United States if they initially fail to prove that claim.
The decision was written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito. Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.
The court ruled that asylum-seekers claiming fear of persecution abroad do not have to be given a federal court hearing before quick removal from the United States if they initially fail to prove that claim.
The decision was written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito. Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)4. That's the only one today
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)5. Not yet, they're just warming up