General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI fail to find anything derogatory or sexist in labeling white priviledged women "Karen"
my introduction to "Karen" memes came via Facebook and cats:
didn't and do not find anything derogatory or sexist in that.
yet every time someone posts a "Karen" post depicting an out-of-control, controlling white woman, several posters chime in to label the term Karen as sexist.
What am I missing here?
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)I was called a Karen because I have a corgi dog.
Hell if I know.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)It would. Besides I was called the queen when I was a teenager, by my own family. Plus I love Queen.
My life in a meme, with a corgi dog.
ChazII
(6,205 posts)thought, too.
TristanIsolde
(272 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)It's that it takes a perfectly good name and makes it essentially a curse word.
Shall we do that with some men's names? Okay, john is out there, but it's been out there for generations. So let's call white supremacists all Bill or Joe.
Do you get it now?
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)sometimes a name is a name.
period.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)a particular kind of hateful white woman. Let's do that with a man's name. Let's start calling all the cops who kill, Bill. Or Joe. Let's make those names -- or some other perfectly good man's name -- into something to be despised.
Maeve
(42,287 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Are you fucking really serious?
PTWB
(4,131 posts)you must be new here
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)CatWoman
(79,302 posts)i just thought that was funny as people curse like sailors around here.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Jody is the name of someone a significant other of a service member cheats with while they are overseas.
meadowlander
(4,402 posts)a certain kind of British military officer :-D
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rupert
safeinOhio
(32,714 posts)Bubba.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)And we name hurricanes after people. Do you complain about that, too?
Ms. Toad
(34,086 posts)Men, even if they behave identically, are not similarly labeled.
(As for John, people named their child "john" knowing all of the negative implications associated with it. It's not fair to the child, but it is not like the name they were given was suddenly turned into a curse word. The same is not true of women named Karen.)
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)It's not sexist to acknowledge that white women are the handmaidens of white supremacy and some of its cruelest soldiers.
Ms. Toad
(34,086 posts)It is currently being used as a derogatory label for any white woman you disagree with, whether or not they are exhibiting that kind of behavior.
Whatever it's intent was originally, it is now just being used as a generic insult that is directed at women, exclusively.
tblue37
(65,483 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)the semi-negative connotations.
The recent denigration of the name Karen is vastly different.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)at some point became associated with something derogatory.
This is Karen's time for entering the spotlight.
Crunchy Frog
(26,628 posts)People who don't like them can just as easily choose to be Ricks or Bills.
Karen is a given name for which there are no commonly used nicknames.
I also wonder if people will gradually slip into using it as a word for a woman who is "overly" assertive.
Sympthsical
(9,099 posts)So yes, there are male equivalents in current meme culture.
Dont be such a Chad.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)Apparently the rock I live under is vastly larger than I realized.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)And I've never used it. I don't even call guys donalds.
Sympthsical
(9,099 posts)Id rather swim in piss than spend any time there.
I am a frequent redditor, however. Chad and Karen have been terms there for years. Now Karen has gone mainstream. Its very funny to me.
The gnashing of teeth over a meme is just . . . a very Karen thing to do. Were the real victims because of a word! Not the privilege, entitlement, or fragility it calls out. No, the word is the woorrrrst.
Please. So silly. Lets get some self-awareness in this discussion.
Chad, btw, means a white male douchebag who is kind of oblivious to how much of an asshole he is. He thinks hes cool. Everyone else hates him.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)I thought democrats were better than this.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)They think of "Chads" as frat boy types. They want to think of themselves as all that in bed and calling them, "Chads" or "Kens" as I have heard some calling them too, is only feeding their ego trips and their power trips. "Kens" and "Chads" they are not. More like "Bubbas," but they see that as a compliment too and get an ego trip about it.
Why not call them, "Karens" too and be done with it? They'd hate that more than anything. Their culture is very sexist. Calling them "Karens" would actually bother them and hit them in their egos. To be compared to women or gay people would actually hit them in their egos. They hate that more than anything.
They see women as inferior. So, to be compared to a woman is the worst insult you can give them.
Right now, they are proud of themselves for being bigots, because they are actually being called names that build up their ego even more. It keeps them in their power trip. I'd rather see their power trips and egos busted so they will stop terrorizing the rest of us. Call them "Karens" and bust them.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Karen meant a complainer to lower placed service people. Now people are changing these to suit their personal agenda.
Sympthsical
(9,099 posts)I know this is all new to people who don't spend a lot of time within meme culture (usually older users of the internet). But as a relatively younger sort, I promise you that Chad is in no way a complimentary term as it is contemporaneously used.
Karen hasn't changed. It definitely had origins in the service industry. In that case, it was a class distinction. Usually older, middle to upper class, (and almost always) white women who used their status to belittle and harass lower class service workers.
Applying it to racial minorities doesn't change the use. It's leaning on one's status to put someone "in their place." The racist incidents apply.
I love that people are spending so much time on this. It shows that privilege can go deep even on our side. Were black people hogging the victimization spotlight or something? People got jealous and decided they, too, needed to feel oppressed, so now this word that's been around for ages is the ultimate evil of the week?
I hope people realize how silly and privileged they look with all this. Black people are dying in this country, but no, it's "OMG, you guys. Let's do Ivanka!" "Right?!" "It's just so sexist. I'm so offended." "Why don't people care about my feelings?!"
There's a word for this behavior. Tip of my tongue.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What good is it doing? Karen is a common name for the late baby boomer generation and a lot of them are complaining about being labeled. I have about 10 in my high school class. Yeah it's not like being a slave or a victim of genocide, but then most people don't experience that. I see on DU we are not to call a woman a "bitch" and now a common name is used to say essentially the same thing.
Hogging the victim spotlight? I see. It's great to be a victim. Then you can guilt everyone else. I guess that's the payoff? And in groups, not as individuals.
Black people are not dying en masse. Look at the number of police shootings per contact and they are rare. Black men disproportionate true, but it's not so common that you can say "Black people are dying" as if it's a common thing. A few videos of "Karen" shown as if every black person encounters such a white person every day. No, it's rare, that's why someone whipped out their phone.
A problem, but what is the point of exaggerating it, thus giving it less credibility with the average American. Exaggeration does seem to be part of our culture generally.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6406
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)nt
mcar
(42,372 posts)As he's always said, try being named after a toilet.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)What do you do when your name is Richard and people call you Dick?
There is also the matter of John, which has two not so complimentary references.
Ms. Toad
(34,086 posts)Are the names Richard, Dick, or John being stolen after they were already named one of those, and turned into a curse word?
No one named their child Richard, Dick, or John without knowing the alternate meaniings.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)became associated with something unpleasant. John had always been one of the most common Christian names.
And yet all those Johns survived the experience.
BannonsLiver
(16,439 posts)But then again, Im not that sensitive. Calling Trump Bunker Bitch didnt bother me at all but some people here got weird about it.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)or in the 60s. Names like Lisa, Linda, and Mary were more popular.
2. Plenty of strong, "entitled" women of that era, including Karens, kept up the fight for work equality, reproductive rights, and smashing gender stereotypes. It was women of that age, and maybe a few a little older, that became astronauts, scientists, etc.
Personally, I don't think a personal name should be used to demean someone. It isn't fair to everyone who actually has that name. Who will the Jennifers be? What will Laurens look like? Is Karen being used to take the place of bitch? If it is politically incorrect to say bitch, why is using a woman's personal name any better?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)You expressed this much better than I have.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Name, like entitled bitch? "Karen" doesn't mean that. It is from Katherine, and means strong. Names like Regina actually mean entitled.
I have a few friends named Karen and they don't like their name being abused.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Bishop Talbert Swan calls racist or clueless white men Chad.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)One item is gut wrenching and heartbreaking. The other is a nip-it-in-the-bud. Despising racism doesn't justify another generalization or name-calling.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)This is what I could find from dictionary.com
Karen joins a trend on the internet in the 2010s of using a first name to make fun of certain kinds of people. A Becky, for example, is a stereotype for a basic young, white woman, while a Chad, in other corners of the internet, stands in for a cocky, young dudebro.
But, why the name Karen? Karen has widely been credited to Black Twitter in the 2010s. Another suggestion is that it comes from a 2005 bit by Dane Cook called The Friend Nobody Likes. (The friend was named Karen.) An additional explanation is that it comes from the character Karen in the 2004 film Mean Girls, whos the subject of the popular quote: Oh my God, Karen, you cant just ask someone why theyre white. Its even been put forth that Karen comes from the even earlier 1990 film Goodfellas, in which one of the characters is named Karen.
Whatever the origin of the slang, the name Karen, apparently, is popularly thought of as a generic-seeming name for a middle-aged white woman of a certain generation. According to Social Security data, Karen was indeed the fourth most popular name for newborn girls in the 1960s, peaking at #3 in 1965.
(snip)
Karen further spread in 2020 amid the coronavirus pandemic and protests for racial justice. White women in viral videosengaging in what was criticized as selfish or racist behaviorwere shamed as Karens. The mayor of Las Vegas, for example, was called a Karen when, in a TV interview, she pushed to reopen casinos without social distancing despite warnings otherwise. Another notable instance was Central Park Karen, the epithet for a white woman who called the police on a Black man who was birdwatching in the Manhattan park, falsely accusing him of threatening her.
https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/karen/
I don't use it but I understand that most people that use it are calling out racism.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)against women with that name.
Nobody names their kid "Adolf" anymore because even if they are good, the initial impression is not.
but we are not seeing the attributes of women from that era in this one, are we?
All I see from the Karens of this ear is self entitlement and brazen white priviledge.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)kcr
(15,318 posts)It's no accident there aren't dozens of threads about Chad, Matt, Kevin or any of the other names people think are equivalent on DU. It's not a coincidence it's not one single name for men.
CountAllVotes
(20,878 posts)Like Barbie and KEN.
See ya' Ken!
Ms. Toad
(34,086 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)where we can call upon structural racism to save us, if we choose to. White women know our whiteness can be used as a weapon in confrontations with Black people and other POC. I am a white women of that age who chooses not to do so and I have not been called a Karen. This is not a coincidence. It makes people uncomfortable but hopefully that makes us look at structural racism and the ways it benefits us. I'm much more concerned about structural racism than people being called Karens.
Exactly. In fact, in another thread must now, a poster referred to a racist white guy as Mr. Karen.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)Same problem - different manifestation. Someone made a great post a few weeks back about the male/female division of white supremacy. The woman historically instigates the violence (e.g., calling 911) and the man perpetrates it. That's what the "Karen" label means to me. It can be misused, but I call it out when it is.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)is that it is truly a gentle, charming name. Karen Carpenter, Karen Valentine, etc, bring a lot of smiles to some of us older peeps. And then when you see Karen juxtaposed with the ranting, raving, crazy women that keep debuting in these videos, it adds a little layer of funny to something that its truly horrifying.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)You are an unknown woman named Karen, and people make assumptions about your character based on your name, even though you've tried to live a good life. How is this not another form of discrimination?
Who is making assumptions about someone based on their name? That strikes me as ridiculous. When was the last time you met someone named John and immediately assumed he patronizes hookers? Or someone introduced himself as Dick and you assumed he must be an asshole?
I dont think it works that way.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)names like Adolf when naming their child? A name makes a difference in impressions like it or not.
So wtf back at you.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Perhaps you ought not give that type of person the time of day.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Impressions to make where point systems are not used. For example, democratic politician named Karen would now have an additional obstacle to overcome. Names make a difference in the real world. It's just another way to belittle a group of people, including those who don't deserve it. There's no high road here.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Yes, Black women are named Karen, so it really doesn't doesn't even make sense, does it?
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Im not sure if you noticed but about her poster here linked some comments from a black woman (named Karen) who is all for the term. I see the term used frequently on twitter by black people when theyre calling out abhorrent behavior.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)PTWB
(4,131 posts)It is a very specific label used to call out a very specific behavior. If the term Karen begins to see widespread use in a misogynistic way we will have to step away from it and come up with a new label.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)We didn't make this label. Twitter or Reddit or something did. Probably people younger than most of us. We aren't in charge of it and can't make it go away. We can discuss whether its a big deal or not, but we can't get society to step away from it, because we aren't in charge of it.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)There are a lot of people saying it is - that it has a place - and some saying it isnt. Discussions like this are healthy.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)And discussions that force us to look at how white privilege manifests in our society are healthy, so I agree.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)the definition of racist entitlement or very specific behavior. Instead of referring to her idiotic behavior, a gender-biased slur was used.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)I think until misuse becomes commonplace we dont have an issue. But we should be wary.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)The behavior could belong within any gender, any race, but they karen-ized it.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Im not even sure that story wasnt a creative writing exercise.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Glad to know it.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)You discounted it, as if it is meaningless, or doesn't apply.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)The vet story seemed odd to me. It might be true - it might be an exercise in creative writing - but the posters use of Karen within the context of that story was inappropriate. The storys veracity (or lack there of) has no bearing on the appropriateness of the posters misuse of Karen. It was just an aside.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)Many women are also telling you the opposite.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)These folks are often doing it at the expense of a minority in a racist way.
No one has made a compelling argument why we should not use the Karen label to describe this behavior. The closest compelling argument Ive seen the recent development of this label has left some folks named Karen feeling uncomfortable. I have yet to see how their experience is any different from those of folks named Dick, Felicia, John, Randy, or any of the other names that also have other meanings.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)Yet you will ignore it the same way you didnt even see it to begin with.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)You dont care to address any of my points?
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)hang out with people who would judge someone because of their given name. I grew up blonde, but I never worried about blonde jokes because they didn't describe me. Being called Karen wouldn't bother me either.
BUT, I do understand that it could cause people with the name discomfort if they are sensitive and think it's commendable that you are so thoughtful about it. I don't think that this genie is likely to go back into the bottle though...
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,878 posts)My cat Silver is a big big tabby cat and he was sick so I took him to this *new* vet.
He doesn't go to the vet often (if ever) and he was yowling up a storm. I mean a loud loud moan and then some.
The new vet is a total "Karen" of a woman and she got out this bottle of Feliway and began spraying it around the room which made my Silver moan ever louder. She was SCARED, SCARED to death of my Silver (and he's actually a nice fellow)!
I told her to put that bottle of crap away as it is frightening Silver.
She didn't know what to do!
So, I paid the bill and my Silver and I left that dump, never to return ever!
HA!
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)How about something like, the vet was a total idiot.
Sewa
(1,257 posts)And Im one of them.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)It's easier to shift the discussion away from the real issue and turn it into yet a other opportunity to make the people who are causing the problem in the first place into the "real" victim.
Let's not talk about the long pattern of some white women abusing, demeaning and threatening black people and instead talk about how the language black people and our allies use to talk about it victimizes white women.
mcar
(42,372 posts)Let's shift the topic to those poor white women being called a woman's name rather than focusing on their behavior.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Which helps to explain why so many white women voted for Trump - the racial solidarity is hard to break.
egduj
(805 posts)Not using it offends no one. If the choices are offending no one or offending someone, why not choose to offend no one?
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)It doesn't offend every Native American but enough say it offends them so the name should be changed.
egduj
(805 posts)It's also why I despise the Tomahawk chop of the Atlanta Braves and other racist symbology.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Ilsa
(61,697 posts)gulliver
(13,186 posts)It's childish at best.
CatLady78
(1,041 posts)Just as a strategic thing. There might be a number of so-called Karens you would want to poach away from Trump this year. That is the demographic that is likeliest to defect.
Otoh I am not sure how stable someone's support is if their voting decisions are impacted by a meme .
PTWB
(4,131 posts)100,000 Karens but gain the vote of 1,000,000 people sick of folks abusing their white privilege in racist ways?
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)One is not dependent upon the other.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)I suggest that while we may lose some (and really, how many racist white privileged women do we really have to begin with??) we will gain many more than we lose by standing tall and proud.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)be made to feel uncomfortable ... But black people need to stop being so sensitive, angry, impatient, and demanding because we all need to get along?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)and even from an electoral standpoint, who are more reliable voters? Whom should we be getting out to vote more?
PTWB
(4,131 posts)It seems like some folks are now beginning to accept discussing white privilege and those who abuse it, but they draw the line at actually confronting specific acts and actions.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)You really think that any white women named Karen who would have otherwise voted Democratic would decide not to vote for Joe Biden because some random people somewhere referred to privileged white women as a "Karen"?
Be serious.
You really would trust anyone that snowflaky and easily-triggered to vote Democratic but for the term Karen when they obviously are likely to let anything that happens on any given day - something read on a billboard, a mean tweet about dog owners who let their pets poop on the sidewalk that they were sure was directed at them, an insult from the guy babbling on the park bench, etc. - influence their vote?
Black and brown people get insulted every day all day by our fellow Democrats- sometimes on this very discussion board. I can only imagine if we started whining about how we can't ever say anything that might possibly in any way be considered offensive by even ONE black person because that could mean they won't vote.
This whole thread is an illustration in the pathology of Kareness ....
mcar
(42,372 posts)because of the term "Karen?" Really?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)are generally seen as more important than confronting and discussing racism. Yes, the term Karen causes discomfort. Is that more important than discussions around how white privileged women sometimes weaponize systemic racism?
mcar
(42,372 posts)Using the term "Karen" is a tool to bring those issues to light - a social media tool that helps these discussions happen.
I'm an old white woman. I do not care about "white fragility." I care about black people in this country being treated as less than - in public, on video, over and over again by these poor fragile snowflake white people who fall apart when they are called "Karen."
Black people are being treated like crap by these people. That is the issue - not the fragile feelings of a few women who I highly doubt would vote D anyway.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I think I intended to reply to the same post you were replying to
tinrobot
(10,914 posts)Women who do not fit the stereotype.
Every time I hear that name tossed around, I feel bad for the good Karens.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)You know, the ones who dont patronize hookers?
Or what about the poor souls named Donald who dont try to ruin the country?
BannonsLiver
(16,439 posts)PTWB
(4,131 posts)Engaging in a conversation? Listening to what folks have to say?
BannonsLiver
(16,439 posts)In reading your responses you dont appear to be doing a whole helluva lot of listening.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)bedazzled
(1,769 posts)Call an asshole an asshole
babylonsister
(171,079 posts)I read this thread.
I don't know any Karens.
Xolodno
(6,398 posts)...so
Bye Felicia!
betsuni
(25,607 posts)Mariana
(14,860 posts)CousinIT
(9,256 posts)Celerity
(43,487 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,494 posts)People seem to constantly look for ways to make others feel just a little inferior to themselves, as a tiny boost to their self-esteem.
Examples:
* Dumb blonds.
* Short people.
* Poor people.
* Handicapped people.
* Overweight people.
* People not "pretty" of "handsome".
* People without advance education or that have a GED.
* People that can't afford nice clothing or automobiles.
At first, I thought the Karen thing was humorous but it then occurred to me that from now on, little girls named Karen may be slighted or looked down on in school or among their peers. It's just not worth the risk to children.
In addition, I can guarantee you that many adult women named Karen will be seen as "less than" by peers in their workplace and communities, no matter how intelligent or capable they are.
KY............
Kaleva
(36,332 posts)If labeling privileged white women "Karen" is one tool, then by all means use it.
ChazII
(6,205 posts)phylny
(8,385 posts)Very good points all.
tinrobot
(10,914 posts)If someone is an asshole, there are better ways to describe it than "Karen"
LeftInTX
(25,525 posts)It then turned into a white privilege thing
hlthe2b
(102,343 posts)it increasingly seems to be used as an excuse to diminish/ignore/deride ANY woman (especially white women) who are complaining about ANYTHING-- no matter whether justified or not. IN THAT respect, I fear it is going to become another tool for blatant misogyny.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)in using it, it already is.
obamanut2012
(26,111 posts)Seriously, most of the "Karen" memes and thread are this.
Liek someone up thread said, there's a reason why this meme isn't about men.
treestar
(82,383 posts)from an outer characteristic. There are men who ask for the manager, you know. And there are POC who might act that way. No POC has ever complained of bad service? They might not always be in the wrong about that, either. Maybe Karen has a legit gripe with whatever is going on. It's generalizing and merely because you see the group as "privileged" it is still judging people on an outer characteristic.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)It's a generalization about white women who exhibit a certain behavior, but I'm a white woman of Karen age who has never been called a Karen. Most white women have never been called Karens because only some white women use structural racism as a tool, and that is what the meme is about.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I've seen that theme here. Are you sure you'll never be called a Karen? Someone might deem you one, and they have the right to say it, as they have the right to determine how they feel about your action. I've seen that one here, too.
Haven't seen any Marks described. (I had 4 Karens in my second grade class, dozens of Marks. And Lisas. I'm that age, too).
gollygee
(22,336 posts)But only some choose to weaponize their privilege. The meme is calling out white women who call upon their privilege to win in confrontations with POC, and particularly Black men. Our society is structured to protect white women, which is an anachronism but is still embedded in culture. Only some white women use that for their benefit, be we all have that privilege and power if we choose to use it. Hopefully we choose not to use it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's like calling women bitches.
And being privileged makes it OK to use a race of sex based slur? Sounds like revenge to me, in which case, why do you think any majority of white women will respond as you wish? I'm not talking about me, but white women generally, a majority of which voted for Trump. This is supposed to change their minds?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)And we have a particular spot in white supremacy, because white supremacy is partly organized around the concept of protecting white women. We can be dangerous when we use white privilege as a weapon, and white women both historically and recently have been dangerous in this way.
I am not in charge of the use of the word Karen. Nobody here at DU is. We keep having conversations around changing it or not using it as if it is our choice. I have seen Black people using it to describe a problem they haven't had a way to describe before. I am not going to sit and scold them for choosing a name to use for people who look exactly like me and who behave badly. Another part of white supremacy is white people trying to oversee and control responses POC have to racism. That's not my job.
treestar
(82,383 posts)But even a privileged person can find something unpleasant. "It could be worse. You could be a person of color." When does "it could be worse" ever help? And it is doing the same thing you are complaining about, which undermines the message. The Golden Rule, when not applied, just makes things worse.
I am not scolding anyone. I am saying I do not think that this is going to help and might make things worse. There are plenty of white people who think they should be privileged. Only the liberals feel guilty about it. (But note most of them will not give it up either, at most, maybe vote for Democrats who might put social programs into place, vote for affirmative action, support voting rights and civil rights, etc.).
But's it's still judging people due to the color of their skin. Further, it doesn't resonate with white people to be grouped - they don't have group identity. You can see this when white supremacists whine that too many white people don't care. It stokes the division.
Celerity
(43,487 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)White women who use their white privilege to call upon structural racism to give them an edge in confrontations with Black people or other POC. There isn't a good short way to say that. If it forces us white women to investigate the ways white privilege might give us an edge so we can interrupt it, then that doesn't seem like a bad thing to me.
Kaleva
(36,332 posts)One can get banned from here for calling women, gays, or minorities certain names but I don't think there's any term that is white male specific that could get you banned if you used it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 26, 2020, 09:20 AM - Edit history (1)
directed at women. In a real sense, all women are Karens. Misogyny is about gender, not skin color, though black women suffer the effects of its malice above all others.
Including indirectly as in this -- through the encouragement of what should never be encouraged be by using "Karens" as an excuse. Indulging hostility doesn't relieve it, it increases and emboldens it.
My guess is, if examined, we'd also find a fair amount of overlap between "Karen" perps and those who directed misogynistic malice toward Hillary. She did present herself as a giant target, albeit in a far more admirable (to some) way. And there were certainly convenient crowds to hide in, which, like these now, pretended their hostility had nothing to do with gender.
We're living through mean times, and it's not only the right who are less than their best versions.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Kaleva
(36,332 posts)I see people who supported Hillary using the label and I see members who supported Sanders using it. And I see supporters of either who oppose the use.
But that's just what I see and I I don't have the time to reserch all the threads mentioning Karen and see who posted what.
Maybe I'll do a poll.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I speculated because this kind of thing comes from within. It isn't generated by those who happen to be the current targets, though the pretense with these is that it is.
Over farther right, strong bigots are typically ready to go hostile against almost any group if one associated with it did something they didn't like.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Ilsa
(61,697 posts)And why? Because of the negative connotations in the first impression. It's like intentionally making the child's life harder.
Using personal names to describe bad behavior, whether it's Becky or Dick or Karen, sets up discrimination and violence for people who've led good lives. It is sexist.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)juvenile name-calling our political opponents engage in?
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)KatyMan
(4,209 posts)Way, at least in this 50+ year old's life. Buffy, Chad also.
ismnotwasm
(41,999 posts)White fragility.
Im a strong feminist and I just cant get worked up over Karen I have a Latino friend who didnt know about it, but she Immediately understood the concept perfectly. Thinks its funny.
A privileged white woman who gets away with behaviors that her counterparts never would.
Theres a lot, and I mean a LOT of racist, sexist memes out there when it comes to women of color.
White women, along with a certain type of white feminism have escaped some well deserved criticism until fairly recently. Is it hurtful? Only to women with toxic whiteness and entitled behavior. Is it sexist? Only if its applied universally. Ive seen the meme applied to WOC, so I understand the angst and the objection to a point. But Im not buying it.
ESPECIALLY not right now.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)This whole thing is ridiculous. But the "HOW DARE YOU KAREN US!!!" is a perfect illustration of the whole Karen of it all.
ismnotwasm
(41,999 posts)I cringe. I just cringe so hard at this
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I wish there was a similar word for the males who act the same way. We need something to call the males who act the same as the females who get called Karens.
It is the only thing that would make them change their crappy ways, because, in reality, right now, they hold all or most of the power and they are using it to "dominate" the rest of us.
No one else has outright came out and said what we know "dominate" means. That is a snide way of saying anal rape. It is code for anal rape, figuratively, so far. Everyone, instinctively, knows it but won't say it. I will, though, because it is an important clue in how to get back at these power tripping, out of control, white supremacists. I figured out why Trump wanted bayonets to attack protesters. He knows people are pissed off at him and he knows what happened to Qaddafi when he was dragged out of his hiding hole. He wants to do it to protesters before someone does it to him. It's all about rape with him and his worshipers. With bigots, in general, it is all a huge pro-rape culture.
Bigots are proud of themselves for being bigots. They won't respond to anything else. The only thing that would unsettle them enough to change would be something that reminds them of their culture. Just like Trump talked about "dominating" protesters. Bigot culture is very pro anal rape. Remember teabagging? Yeah, that was their bullshit too.
Maybe that is the answer. Call the males who act the same way, "Karens" too. They won't actually get raped, but they will be reminded they are not as immune to being on the receiving end as they think they are. Plus, they will get a lot of lip about it and have to learn to act right or pay too. They need to pay too, in a way they will "get" or understand. Right now, they are getting WAY too much of a pass. They need to pay too and get called names too. If they don't, this bullshit will continue. They need to pay too, in a way that impacts them more than they are currently being impacted.
We DO need a similar thing to call the males that makes an impact on them too. We don't need weak ass "Kens" or any of that. I have heard that suggested, but none of those bigots are "Kens." Not even close. They are more like "Bubbas" not "Kens." So, why give them an ego trip and make them think they look good? They don't. They are not Ken. Whatever we end up calling them needs to hit right them in the ego in a way that reminds them they are not all powerful. Watching them getting away with their power trips right now is disgusting. We need to come up with a name to call them that will knock them off their power trips. "Karen" would do for them too. It will break their "movement" if we can hit them where they don't want to be hint, figuratively, legally figuratively, of course.
So, just call male bigots "Karens" too. Problem solved.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I have found that many, if not most bigots have no idea they are bigots. They are sure they're fair and open-minded and that any negative views they have about minorities aren't related in any way to bigotry but are just based on facts (of course, their "facts" are skewed and shaped by their bigotry).
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)At least that is what I have seen most of the time with the ones where I live. Calling them on it just makes them worse, where I live. Or, that has been what I have seen when I would say something to them about it. It could be because I am female and they hate for a female to call them on anything. They do hate women, I have noticed. They all seem to have that in common. It is not in any way a gay thing. They are straight but resent being told something different than what they think is right by a woman. They blow up at you if you are a woman and try to talk to them about it. I know that from my experiences, not matter how tactful I was forcing myself to be. It is also why we will probably never have a female president in America, not counting the Native American nations. Some of them have had female leaders for ages now.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Although Kevin is usually just intensely stupid. Like the guy from The Office.
MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)And this has been going on for years and years.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)term is necessary.
betsuni
(25,607 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Someone said it's as horrible as if people were calling Black men Jamal in a similar way. The lack of recognition of what risks actually exist for Black men compared to white women in our society is astounding. If the biggest thing Black men had to fear when getting pulled over by the police was being called Jamal, everything would be different.
Celerity
(43,487 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)It's almost funny.
betsuni
(25,607 posts)It's taboo to generalize white people? Sure, Jan.
phylny
(8,385 posts)Nah. Just not a fan of ridicule, nastiness, and name-calling. They are Republican traits and nothing I'd like to be associated with. The purpose is to demean.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)BIPOC in public, you are free to do that.
phylny
(8,385 posts)I start with that white woman who is acting racist which leaves out name calling. I could say, that white woman whos harassing _____ as well.
Celerity
(43,487 posts)If that is not applicable to a person who is trying to stifle this absolutely legit meme and the discussions that go with it, then they have no case or cause to complain.
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)And were perfectly nice people.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)Wonderful, caring and loving person who I miss dearly. So many come up to me now, a year later, and tell me how much they miss her.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Many folks named Karen are perfectly wonderful people.
This isnt about people named Karen.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,191 posts)It's like a beer commercial or GEICO commercial that may have been funny the first or second time you saw it, but quickly lost its humor after seeing it over and over and over again.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)That's the way memes work. They don't rise and fall by the opinion of DU.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,191 posts)That's the general problem with meme humor.
The people who rely by them often use them to excess without regard to their freshness.
Do you know how many parodies of the old "Keep Calm and Carry On" posters still floating around? Does anyone still find those in any way witty?
MrsCheaplaugh
(183 posts)is it's used to silence women. An equivalent male term doesn't exist, because in a patriarchy men don't get silenced. Women do.
mcar
(42,372 posts)How is it used to silence women?
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)women that spoke up, in what they felt were unreasonable privilege. It has been around for at least a year or so dismissing any woman who is assertive in any manner. A way to shut women up. Using it now for bigoted women is a totally different usage. I read in another thread that the difference would be KKKaren and Karen. A woman that speaks up reasonably or unreasonably depending on whose perspective is given.
mcar
(42,372 posts)I was unaware it was created in the service industry, but since the usage has change, then it's not about silencing women anymore, is it?
It's about pointing out systemic racism and privilege.
LeftInTX
(25,525 posts)He created subreddit called FU Karen
Now the subreddit is full of memes..I would link, but my post would get removed.
It even bashes a Vanilla Late by calling it a Karen. (No picture of any person doing anything...just a picture of a Vanilla Late...maybe the late had too many ingredients..I think pumpkin spice was involved) I fail to see how something like this brings anything meaningful into our world.
They call Vegans Karens
They call women who want other people to wear masks Karens...so it goes both ways...
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)being restrictive and critical of women. Putting them in their place. Anything flies. I have even had it pop into my mind when a mistake was made and I am POLITELY addressing the mistake. I am still that Karen.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)meme and in some cases horrible reasons like calling cops while being black. I am saying that it is not now exclusively being used for bigotry, it has simply expanded and spread out in a farther reach. Have an expectation and you are a Karen.
[link:|]
This is the first one I saw. So, a middle age white woman wants to speak to a manager, this is who they are poking. So what? Now none of us can address any issue speaking to a manager because we are "Karen". I do see it as a means of shutting women up, dismissing, demeaning or rejecting voice.
I think what is happening with white women calling cops on a black person simply being black is so beyond this stupid ass Karen meme. I think it slights the very real issue of white women using their bigotry treating the cops as their personal tool for their bigotry.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)to identify a particular group, and indirectly blaming all members of that group for the behavior of a vocal few is wrong, in my opinion. Isn't that what racists do?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)member of that group.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)of white people, then white people are being victimized and that needs to be talked about.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)complaining about fireworks. THE STRUGGLE.
Caliman73
(11,744 posts)We all label things for the sake of clarity and expedience. Otherwise, observing, recording, and judging every single interaction as unique and new would take up all of our mental processing power.
Now, I certainly agree that when those labels are used to oppress a whole group of people, whether it be Black people, Brown people, women, LGBT people, etc... it is damaging and should not be done.
The danger with "Karen" is not necessarily how women named Karen will be affected, but that the definition of Karen is not set, and can certainly be abused to mean all White women, then ALL women.
That is something we need to be aware of.
There will always be labels and there will be people who are offended by the label and people who feel that it is a necessary shorthand to expose behavior.
I think it is a worthy discussion.
KG
(28,752 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,439 posts)That would be my initial observation.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)discuss it here. So, it really is kind of funny in an interesting way.
I am going thru a lot of really horrible experience with my mouth over the last month, dealing with doctors and nurses trying to heal, and fix different pains, and be able to eat.
Today, on a Friday right before the place closes for two day, I have a liner (a really thick firm gel like substance) that tastes and smells to very toxic put in my mouth. And though I wanted to ask immediately if they knew for a fact I was not poisoning myself, I felt what an absurd question. I already ask way to many questions. I like to gather as much info as I can for choices and equally, I am a bit of an hypochondriac which results in LOTS of questions.
That is kinda frowned on by society as a whole but especially in Authoritarian type medical offices. Especially with women. Forever. We are all aware of this, it is a fact that doctors listen to women differently than men. Doctors are aware and have been addressing within. I get that. But, I like to be sensitive to all and not step on toes, I get more things done, as I have learned from society.
So I am sitting at home, replying to some of the comments on the thread about karen and I am more and more aware of the flavor in my mouth, that I cannot get to stop, even with mouthwash, rinsing and even eating an avocado, feeling more and more sick, cause it is really nasty, while I consider if they have done the research that this substance is not toxic. Surely. Do you swear?
I called. And all thru the conversation trying to clarify, I was not accusing anyone of anything, I ask questions sorry, I am an hypochondriac, and I do know it is a stupid question and you would not put toxic in my body. Lol. Please do not think of me as a Karen but just a really messed up person going thru an horrible experience that would like a little reassurance. Thank-you.
All that work to appease others, so I will courtesy be given that assurance before the weekend and I can't talk to anyone.
That is what the Karen meme does and where the sexism/Patriarchy is. That is the harm to women. Women that are not the "karen" but just trying to make it thru an horrible experience.
How does that compare to the white bigoted vile woman going after a black person out of pure bigotry and hatred? I mean, the two just simply does not even compare yet we are trying to force it and not gonna happen with me. All the while I will be the one that steps in front of the vile woman and tell her to knock that shit off. No one will have it. I promise. Every time.
It creates a backlash against women while so not big enough for that bigoted vile human being. They are not even comparable. So really, it does not work either way. I have spent most of today considering this from different angles, so it was stuff learned. I can always appreciate that.
[link:|]
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Cosmocat
(14,568 posts)it the kind of bullshit conservatives do.
SiliconValley_Dem
(1,656 posts)others--not so much
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)That makes me a little uncomfortable.
I always thought that "Karen" was about out of control, controlling women. Guess I did know that it was a little seist.
Didn't realize it had a racist element to it.
I never really used the term, but I guess I've laughed about it when I heard it used a few times.
Thanks. Your post make me think about it differently now.