Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:52 PM Sep 2012

They funny thing about Romney insulting the 47 percent

So, anyone who has ever done the following or participated in the following, falls into Mitt Romney's "47 percent" category:

--People who have used the Medicaid System
--Senior Citizens who have ever used the Medicare System
--Senior Citizens who receive Social Security benefits
--Young people who have taken out a student loan to get an undergraduate degree
--College students who have received a Pell Grant
--Lawyers, Doctors and post-grad students who have taken out student loans
--Veterans who have received Veteran's benefits
--Unemployed workers who have ever received an unemployment check
--People who have been on welfare
--People who have received food stamps
--Natural Disaster victims who have ever received support from FEMA
--Widows have have collected Social Security benefits after losing a spouse
--Farmers who have accepted subsidies for growing food
--Scientists and Researchers who accept government research grants
--Parents who have enrolled their children in Head Start

How many people can say that they haven't ever or don't currently fall into one of those categories? It's much higher than Mitt Romney's "47 percent" for sure!

The truth is--it's probably closer to 90 percent of Americans--who have used government services like these before. Not 47 percent.

Mr Romney: We are not leeches. We are not lazy. We are not dependent. And we do "care about our lives."

You are blinded by your contempt for anyone who has ever used or benefitted from programs and assistance.

The only people who haven't needed these government services--are outrageously wealthy and those who have access to an endless supply of money--much like yourself. There's nothing wrong with being wealthy Mr. Romney. However, Warren Buffet is wealthy and he isn't a callous jerk. There's no excuse for your arrogance and your disdain for good and decent hardworking people--who just happen to benefit from good government.

You don't get America, Mr. Romney. You may not care about this "47 percent" which, according to your definitions--really is about 90 percent of the country--but after your remarks I don't think most of the country really cares (or relates to you) either.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They funny thing about Romney insulting the 47 percent (Original Post) CoffeeCat Sep 2012 OP
also ananda Sep 2012 #1
Yes, a very good point CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #4
I thought the 47% are those who don't pay federal income taxes. dkf Sep 2012 #2
All of those on the list wouldn't make enough money to pay income taxes. JaneyVee Sep 2012 #3
But the point is... CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #8
I thought his remark... CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #5
Still criticizing liberals and carrying water for the RW, eh? kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #6
Do you expect anything else? 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2012 #12
It's no use. Mitt is screwing up badly and will lose spectacularly. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2012 #11
Yeah, sure you did. RetroLounge Sep 2012 #14
NEVER HangOnKids Sep 2012 #15
Really? LaurenG Sep 2012 #16
I imagine there are a lot of people in low-paying jobs or no jobs who would love to pay income taxes aint_no_life_nowhere Sep 2012 #7
well using your criteria SmileyRose Sep 2012 #9
I don't recall having an asshole or a sociopath category... CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #10
make no mistake about it - the top 1% get the lions share of government spending. SmileyRose Sep 2012 #13

ananda

(28,866 posts)
1. also
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:56 PM
Sep 2012

Companies like Bain getting a bailout.

Mitt's Olympics getting a bailout.

Big banks getting bailouts.

Legislators getting salaries and health insurance.

And so on . . .

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
4. Yes, a very good point
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:02 AM
Sep 2012

When the lower 99 percent benefits from government--were idiots who are dependent on government who also don't "care about their lives."

When the 1 percent gets bailed out or gets special tax breaks or benefits from loopholes--no judgements are passed.

Mitt asserts that those who pay lower taxes are leeches, but many multinational conglomerates, such as GE--pay NO taxes. What the hell does he say about that? Nothing.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
2. I thought the 47% are those who don't pay federal income taxes.
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:58 PM
Sep 2012

What is with all that other stuff you are posting?

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
3. All of those on the list wouldn't make enough money to pay income taxes.
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:01 AM
Sep 2012

Edit: Oops, read the list quick. I'm guessing scientists probably earn enough, depending.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
8. But the point is...
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:09 AM
Sep 2012

that people get on these lists and then move off of these lists.

Everyone needs a little help now and again.

Romney was insulting anyone who had ever benefitted from government programs. He was doing what Republicans usually do--demonizing those who benefit from government programs--or want to live in a society that has these programs for people who need them.

In reality--most people have needed some of these things at least one time or another. That doesn't mean that those people are lazy or stupid.




CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
5. I thought his remark...
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:05 AM
Sep 2012

...was said--about 47 percent of people who will vote for Obama "no matter what." That's the first sentence he used to describe the people he "didn't care about."

Then, he went on to describe this 47 percent--and how many don't pay taxes, and most are dependent on government and think that they're entitled to government services.

I'll have to check the quote again!

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
7. I imagine there are a lot of people in low-paying jobs or no jobs who would love to pay income taxes
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:06 AM
Sep 2012

as it would mean they were making more money. To blast low income people in this economy is a dead bang loser of an issue.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
10. I don't recall having an asshole or a sociopath category...
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:18 AM
Sep 2012

haha!

Yes, most people have used or benefitted from government services. Or they have a mother, father, sister or friend who has.

When Mitt insulted people who benefit from government programs--by insisting that we feel "entitled" he was really insulting anyone who had EVER benefitted from government services.

So, anyone who has needed a student loan to pay for college--is bad. Anyone farmer who gets subsidies for having windmills on his land--is bad.

His remarks really put a fine point on how the arch-convervatives feel about government programs. They're just like Norquist. They have contempt for anyone in need and they want to drown government in a bathtub.

SmileyRose

(4,854 posts)
13. make no mistake about it - the top 1% get the lions share of government spending.
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:19 AM
Sep 2012

Those zillions upon zillions go disproportionally to the 1%. ADM shareholders make out like bandits on farm subsidies. Banking shareholders make out damn good making all those student loans. They've line their wallets through the military industrial complex, building roads and bridges, keeping and maintaining food and energy production. War.

Not to mention the fact they couldn't get their shit here from the slave labor on the other side of the world if we weren't spending zillions in cash to keep the shipping lanes, railroads and highways safe.

If the entire 99% were on the government dole for every need known to mankind it would not hold one candle to the luxuries the richest of the rich have thanks to the government dole.

This is why government spending raises exponentially now that the US government is a wholly owned subsidiary of the 1%.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They funny thing about Ro...