Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kickitup

(355 posts)
8. I don't doubt that but will it be enough to beat Mitch?
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 12:34 PM
Jun 2020

I supported McGrath when she ran her first race. She is going to have to fight harder than she did then if she's going to win this thing. She refused to go negative and she's going to have to do that this time, IMO.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
14. Booker came much closer than expected against an establishment dem
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 01:09 PM
Jun 2020

Not sure how well that will bode for her.

kickitup

(355 posts)
18. Yeah, I know. Somebody tells you what you don't want to hear and you assume nefarious intent.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 01:44 PM
Jun 2020

I campaigned for McGrath when she ran in what should have been a winnable race two years ago. I donated money, put signs in my yard, and championed her on social media. After that loss, excuse me if I don't have enough enthusiasm.

Brother Buzz

(36,440 posts)
11. One might assume, with the primaries behind, that powers and resources are now free to....
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 12:45 PM
Jun 2020

step up and help tune her machine.

It's still a long slog, but I need to believe she can topple him.

I'm also curious how involved Booker will become.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
16. I'm sorry Booker didn't take hold sooner.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 01:11 PM
Jun 2020

But I will rally around, because that's what Democrats need to do.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT calls it for McGrath