General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCLINT WENT THERE!
If somebodys dumb enough to ask me to go to a political convention and say something, theyre gonna have to take what they get.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/reliable-source/post/quoted-clint-eastwood-explains-some-more-about-tampa/2012/09/18/b55a7a3c-0145-11e2-b257-e1c2b3548a4a_blog.html
O-M-EFFIN-G!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)pepperbear
(5,648 posts)"You fucked up. You trusted us. Hey, make the best of it!"
?w=655
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)mucifer
(23,553 posts)I'm thinking he is being self deprecating.
But, it could mean that he is on our side.
hmmm
It's probably the former.
Of course his manner in being self deprecating isn't exactly helping the repubs.
pepperbear
(5,648 posts)What I love is how they trusted Hollywood and got the Hollywood shuffle.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)The Romney team was probably begging for Clint to do the convention. Although Clint is a republican he's more of an old school republican that really is just about smaller government but he supports things like choice and marriage equality.
I'm guessing after the Romney team refused to take Clint's umpteenth 'not interested', Clint decided to go out there and make a mockery of the convention.
Remember it was the GOP that gave Eastwood shit when Eastwood did that series of Super Bowl commericials for Chrysler and talked about how America Auto industry was rebounding.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)He's old school like Arlen Spector. Clint would be a part of the party of Abraham Lincoln moreso than 99% of the republicans out there today.
Clint's performance was wretched at the convention so wretched you either thought that the dementia was kicking in or Clint was secretly doing a bigass 'fuck you' to the GOP.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)were at a fundraiser Clint was throwing for him in Idaho and mitt's asked him to be there and he said "sure".
on how you define "our side". If as either partisan side, nope. If people's side, yep.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Did anyone see SNL's take on Clint Eastwood? Bill Hader does a great Clint Eastwood imitation. It's was basically an add for a tour of 'Clint Eastwood and the Chair'. They had Clint talking to empty chairs of Jimmy Carter, Michael Bloomberg and Chris Christie (we're gonna need a bigger chair).
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)pepperbear
(5,648 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)begin_within
(21,551 posts)pepperbear
(5,648 posts)washing his hands of it would be back peddling...the kind stuff Mitt does. I read it as "I don't care WTF people think."
BumRushDaShow
(129,118 posts)They threw him under the bus and he just grabbed them and threw them in front of it so they can join him as roadkill.
TlalocW
(15,384 posts)I want to try and steal that chair and then take it Pawn Stars and see what it's worth. Surely someone would pay big bucks for the chair Eastwood spoke to on national TV.
TlalocW
pepperbear
(5,648 posts)I'd pay.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)But he has no reputation as an impromptu speaker. Conventions are supposed to show off political acumen with speaking and staging. The Romney campaign is pure amateur hour.
tama
(9,137 posts)Conventions are supposed to lie and deceit most efficiently. It's good thing that GOP failed.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)Jessy169
(602 posts)My impression of that performance was that he was parodying the Republican Party, but they were just too dumb to get it. I figured after that speech, Clint went home, had a beer, and laughed it up. I hope I'm right.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)The guy is a life-long Republican, and I bet he does sympathize with a lot of their current candidates. He's just kind of a weird guy though. I don't think he went out there to do what they wanted, but just to do whatever he wanted, no matter what other people thought about it; sort of like "High Plains Drifter."
Jessy169
(602 posts)Regardless, the joke WAS on the Republican Party, regardless of Clint's true motivations.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Chris Rock may well want Obama to win, but the Democrats are smart enough to not ask him to speak at their convention.
Jessy169
(602 posts)But like you say, Dems are smart enough to not make comedy acts part of their appeal to voters.
Logical
(22,457 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Always will as an actor and one of the best directors in file history. His intent at the RNC? I can't say. Obviously I strongly disagreed with him. But somehow, I didn't get as bent out of shape as others did.
There are some interesting ideas here. He is NOT a coward, never has been. He has always taken chances with his films, always put creativity and risk above all, and the results are clear. So whatever he did at the RNC.. humm. maybe he was parodying them. He is a man, in my opinion, of utmost character and honesty. BTW I watched Sudden Impact last night. :>
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)I do think the only reason he did it was because of the swag
NOLALady
(4,003 posts)hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)The Eva Longoria who flipped burgers at Wendy's needed a tax cut. The Eva Longoria who works on movie sets does not!
I thought that portion of her speech was very insightful!
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)To see if Clint Eastwood is there.
The meme is basically making it look as if Mr. Eastwood is tougher than Mr. Norris but politically the same could be said too. I believe Mr. Eastwood is old school Republican. Mr. Norris? Nope.
pepperbear
(5,648 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)can you blame him ?
i now wonder if part of the reason he went was to get wingnuts to watch his movies again .
whatever the case, i think the whole thing is funny.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)Harry_Scrote
(121 posts)Chuck Norris is an idiot.
pepperbear
(5,648 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)i think he may have went there to get wingnuts to watch his movies again because many of them were against him for stuff like same sex marriage and some message in his films they consider to be liberal.
just look at that whole speech or act he did. he never gave a reason to support romney. and then he brings up how Obama supported the war in Afghanistan ? and didn't close down gitmo ? if you cared about those issues why would you support romney. the only reference he gave to romney was when he had invisible obama say to him "go f yourself".
he might vote romney but it's more because of tradition. but i don't think he really cares who wins in the end.