Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:23 PM Sep 2012

One size fits all school lunch policies not working for many

"Mukwonago - By 7 a.m. Monday, senior Nick Blohm already had burned about 250 calories in the Mukwonago High School weight room.

He grabbed a bagel and a Gatorade afterward; if he eats before lifting, he gets sick.

That was followed by eight periods in the classroom, and then three hours of football practice. By the time he headed home, he had burned upward of 3,000 calories - his coach thinks the number is even higher.

But the calorie cap for his school lunch? 850 calories."


http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/students-strike-against-new-federal-school-lunch-rules-t96t7sp-170124676.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One size fits all school lunch policies not working for many (Original Post) joeglow3 Sep 2012 OP
he could choose to bring his own lunch instead of blaming the school nt msongs Sep 2012 #1
What if his parent's can't afford it? joeglow3 Sep 2012 #2
He is. dkf Sep 2012 #3
If he's a high school senior Aerows Sep 2012 #4
the feds reimburse districts $2.86 for lunch. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #5
Well Aerows Sep 2012 #6
maybe they need to do lots of things, but they're not going to. in fact, as the HiPointDem Sep 2012 #7
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
4. If he's a high school senior
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:32 PM
Sep 2012

He's old enough to pack his own lunch.

That said, this is pretty stupid. I'm female and 5'3". Why would I need a full 850 calories for lunch every day? (well, actually, I did when I did intense exercise. Remember the Taco Belle Grande at Taco Bell? I once ate 4 of them in one sitting after a lot of exercise, and I've never exceeded 115 in my life).

But a 6'3" football player? It's obvious that a guy that size is going to need to eat a huge quantity of food to keep up with his physical activities. The whole point of school lunch is to make sure kids aren't malnourished.

They ought to let kids like that go through the line as many times as they need to (and not charge them extra) to get full. I'm sure there is probably a lot of waste anyway, why not let the kids in athletics programs eat as much as they need to?

Not all metabolisms are created equal. I applaud them offering more healthy choices of food, but you have to make sure there is plenty of quantity to go along with quality. People who exercise or that just naturally have higher metabolisms are going to require more food than sedentary or people with slower metabolisms. There is nothing wrong with allowing a kid to have more than one container of milk or another container of orange juice.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. Well
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:41 PM
Sep 2012

maybe they need to up the amount reimbursed? I just can't imagine letting a huge kid go hungry when there is still plenty of food that might be wasted if it isn't eaten.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. maybe they need to do lots of things, but they're not going to. in fact, as the
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:43 PM
Sep 2012

article states, they are asking local districts to charge more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One size fits all school ...