Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many vets in Congress-- why not a class-action suit vs Trump on not acting on bounties?? (Original Post) bobbieinok Jul 2020 OP
Why doesn't congress impose sanctions? soothsayer Jul 2020 #1
Because it wouldn't pass Coleman Jul 2020 #3
Lawsuits require evidence... brooklynite Jul 2020 #2
And since it deals with foreign policy Coleman Jul 2020 #4
Maybe they're distracted by the Confederate flag bullshit, like the press is. dem4decades Jul 2020 #5
Judges Sgent Jul 2020 #6

Coleman

(856 posts)
3. Because it wouldn't pass
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:34 AM
Jul 2020

The Senate would reject it, if Moscow Mitch would bring it to a vote. And if it passed, Trumpsky would veto it.

Coleman

(856 posts)
4. And since it deals with foreign policy
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:38 AM
Jul 2020

The courts wouldn't get involved. Plus, Vets wouldn't have standing, they aren't the injured party. Courts love standing to avoid issues.

dem4decades

(11,304 posts)
5. Maybe they're distracted by the Confederate flag bullshit, like the press is.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:51 AM
Jul 2020

Every question should be about Trump doing nothing to Putin, not Trump doing something to Bubba.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
6. Judges
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:58 AM
Jul 2020

cannot tell the executive how to conduct foreign policy and/or military operations. That's for the President, Senate, and Congress to act on (or not).

The fact that we have a terrible Senate doesn't mean the judiciary takes over.

Personally I think we need to change our constitution to get away from a unitary executive aka king, but I'm not sure the best way to do it. Courts have repeatedly held -- from the 1860's Johnson impeachment / court hearing all the way through the consumer finance bureau this term -- that every executive branch employee operates at the pleasure of the president.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Many vets in Congress-- w...