Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUSblog: Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020
Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020
We will be live-blogging on Thursday, July 9, as the court releases the final opinions from the 2019-2020 term. SCOTUSblog is sponsored by Casetext: making litigation more efficient with A.I. and machine learning technology.
For a list of answers to frequently asked questions during our live blogs, click here.
We will be live-blogging on Thursday, July 9, as the court releases the final opinions from the 2019-2020 term. SCOTUSblog is sponsored by Casetext: making litigation more efficient with A.I. and machine learning technology.
For a list of answers to frequently asked questions during our live blogs, click here.
Here's explainer: Supreme Court ruling on Trumps tax returns, financial records to come Thursday https://washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/trump-tax-returns-supreme-court/2020/07/08/d5e9ac30-c11f-11ea-b4f6-cb39cd8940fb_story.html
Link to tweet
The opinions will show up here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/19
Kalvis Golde
When R numbers appear in this column on this page, we're done for the day.
Kalvis Golde
When R numbers appear in this column on this page, we're done for the day.
Mon Jun 22, 2020: Twitter accounts that will be following the SC this morning and the rest of the time:
https://twitter.com/scotusblog
https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
https://twitter.com/hsu_spencer
https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger
https://twitter.com/GregStohr
https://twitter.com/JoanBiskupic
https://twitter.com/Arianedevogue
https://twitter.com/adamliptak
https://twitter.com/mjs_DC
https://twitter.com/DavidLat
I'll add Pete Williams, but he seems not to tweet anymore:
https://twitter.com/PeteWilliamsNBC
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 900 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUSblog: Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020 (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2020
OP
demmiblue
(36,870 posts)1. K&R
Laelth
(32,017 posts)2. This will be interesting. k&r for visibility. n/t
-Laelth
safeinOhio
(32,702 posts)3. K&R
and bookmarked. Set my timer for 2 hours from now.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)4. Great list, thanks! Yesterday was interesting enough,
and now-wow list of the kind of things they left to right before leaving town so to speak.
blogslut
(38,004 posts)5. kick
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)6. They're blogging. NT
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)7. We have McGirt.
We have McGirt.
It is by Gorsuch. The vote is 5-4.
"Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word."
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
It is by Gorsuch. The vote is 5-4.
"Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word."
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
Kalvis Golde
Here is a link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-9526_9okb.pdf
Jul 9 2020 10:01 AM
Here is a link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-9526_9okb.pdf
Jul 9 2020 10:01 AM
Come back in ten minutes.
In case the court's website is crashing for anyone, here is our link to the opinion in McGirt: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/18-9526.pdf
Kalvis Golde
Kalvis Golde
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)8. Wow, score one for justice.
Great news.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #7)
mahatmakanejeeves This message was self-deleted by its author.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)9. SCOTUS finds that a huge swath of Oklahoma is still "Indian country" under current law, majority
SCOTUS finds that a huge swath of Oklahoma is still "Indian country" under current law, majority opinion by Gorsuch
Link to tweet
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)10. SCOTUSblog: Check out our FAQs here:
2 minutes ago
Hello all 30,000 of you. Sorry if we don't get to your questions because they're coming in so fast. Check out our FAQs here: https://www.scotusblog.com/educational-resources/faqs-announcements-of-orders-and-opinions/
Kalvis Golde
Hello all 30,000 of you. Sorry if we don't get to your questions because they're coming in so fast. Check out our FAQs here: https://www.scotusblog.com/educational-resources/faqs-announcements-of-orders-and-opinions/
Kalvis Golde
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)12. Trump v. Vance: hand 'em over, possibly, one of these days. Or not.
The big one (one of them).
m over (but
It is by Roberts. The vote is 7-2.
Article II and the Supremacy Clause do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting President.
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
Here is a link to the Vance opinion on SCOTUSblog as well: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/19-635_o7jq.pdf
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
Here is a link to the Vance opinion on SCOTUSblog as well: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/19-635_o7jq.pdf
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)13. Here comes Mazars.
Kalvis Golde
Here is a link from the court: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf
Jul 9 2020 10:21 AM
Here is a link from the court: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf
Jul 9 2020 10:21 AM
a few seconds ago
The website crashed
Michael Bindner
The website crashed
Michael Bindner
Mark Walsh
Look for it on the homepage of the court.
Look for it on the homepage of the court.
Jul 9 2020 10:22 AM
a minute ago
Again by Roberts, again 7-2: From the syllabus: "The courts below did not take adequate account of the signficant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President's information."
Amy Howe
a minute ago
Again by Roberts, again 7-2: From the syllabus: "The courts below did not take adequate account of the signficant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President's information."
Amy Howe
a minute ago
More of a win for the president, it appears. The question presented, Roberts writes, is whether the subpoeans issued exceed the authority of the House under the Constitution.
Amy Howe
More of a win for the president, it appears. The question presented, Roberts writes, is whether the subpoeans issued exceed the authority of the House under the Constitution.
Amy Howe
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,531 posts)14. Term over. Everyone go home.
Mark Walsh
Yes, R numbers are posted. Not a real surprise there, either. We are done for the term.
Jul 9 2020 10:23 AM
Yes, R numbers are posted. Not a real surprise there, either. We are done for the term.
Jul 9 2020 10:23 AM