Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 06:35 AM Jul 2020

SCOTUSblog: Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020

Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020
We will be live-blogging on Thursday, July 9, as the court releases the final opinions from the 2019-2020 term. SCOTUSblog is sponsored by Casetext: making litigation more efficient with A.I. and machine learning technology.

For a list of answers to frequently asked questions during our live blogs, click here.

Here's explainer: Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s tax returns, financial records to come Thursday https://washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/trump-tax-returns-supreme-court/2020/07/08/d5e9ac30-c11f-11ea-b4f6-cb39cd8940fb_story.html



The opinions will show up here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/19

Kalvis Golde

When R numbers appear in this column on this page, we're done for the day.

Mon Jun 22, 2020: Twitter accounts that will be following the SC this morning and the rest of the time:

https://twitter.com/scotusblog

https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

https://twitter.com/hsu_spencer

https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger

https://twitter.com/GregStohr

https://twitter.com/JoanBiskupic

https://twitter.com/Arianedevogue

https://twitter.com/adamliptak

https://twitter.com/mjs_DC

https://twitter.com/DavidLat

I'll add Pete Williams, but he seems not to tweet anymore:

https://twitter.com/PeteWilliamsNBC
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUSblog: Live blog of opinions - Thursday, July 9, 2020 (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 OP
K&R demmiblue Jul 2020 #1
This will be interesting. k&r for visibility. n/t Laelth Jul 2020 #2
K&R safeinOhio Jul 2020 #3
Great list, thanks! Yesterday was interesting enough, Hortensis Jul 2020 #4
kick blogslut Jul 2020 #5
They're blogging. NT mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #6
We have McGirt. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #7
Wow, score one for justice. lagomorph777 Jul 2020 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #11
SCOTUS finds that a huge swath of Oklahoma is still "Indian country" under current law, majority sunonmars Jul 2020 #9
SCOTUSblog: Check out our FAQs here: mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #10
Trump v. Vance: hand 'em over, possibly, one of these days. Or not. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #12
Here comes Mazars. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #13
Term over. Everyone go home. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #14

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. Great list, thanks! Yesterday was interesting enough,
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 07:40 AM
Jul 2020

and now-wow list of the kind of things they left to right before leaving town so to speak.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
7. We have McGirt.
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:02 AM
Jul 2020
We have McGirt.

It is by Gorsuch. The vote is 5-4.

"Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word."

Amy Howe
a few seconds ago

Kalvis Golde
Here is a link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-9526_9okb.pdf

Jul 9 2020 10:01 AM

Come back in ten minutes.

In case the court's website is crashing for anyone, here is our link to the opinion in McGirt: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/18-9526.pdf

Kalvis Golde

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #7)

sunonmars

(8,656 posts)
9. SCOTUS finds that a huge swath of Oklahoma is still "Indian country" under current law, majority
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:06 AM
Jul 2020

SCOTUS finds that a huge swath of Oklahoma is still "Indian country" under current law, majority opinion by Gorsuch


mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
10. SCOTUSblog: Check out our FAQs here:
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:10 AM
Jul 2020
2 minutes ago
Hello all 30,000 of you. Sorry if we don't get to your questions because they're coming in so fast. Check out our FAQs here: https://www.scotusblog.com/educational-resources/faqs-announcements-of-orders-and-opinions/

Kalvis Golde

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
12. Trump v. Vance: hand 'em over, possibly, one of these days. Or not.
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:13 AM
Jul 2020

The big one (one of them).
m over (but

It is by Roberts. The vote is 7-2.

Article II and the Supremacy Clause do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting President.

Amy Howe
a few seconds ago

Here is a link to the Vance opinion on SCOTUSblog as well: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/19-635_o7jq.pdf

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
13. Here comes Mazars.
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:22 AM
Jul 2020
Kalvis Golde
Here is a link from the court: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf

Jul 9 2020 10:21 AM

a few seconds ago
The website crashed

Michael Bindner

Mark Walsh
Look for it on the homepage of the court.

Jul 9 2020 10:22 AM
a minute ago
Again by Roberts, again 7-2: From the syllabus: "The courts below did not take adequate account of the signficant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President's information."

Amy Howe

a minute ago
More of a win for the president, it appears. The question presented, Roberts writes, is whether the subpoeans issued exceed the authority of the House under the Constitution.

Amy Howe

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,531 posts)
14. Term over. Everyone go home.
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 10:26 AM
Jul 2020
Mark Walsh
Yes, R numbers are posted. Not a real surprise there, either. We are done for the term.

Jul 9 2020 10:23 AM
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUSblog: Live blog of ...