Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Courts in the past have given 'broad deference.' BUT NOT ME!" (Original Post) Skraxx Jul 2020 OP
He must be soiling his Underoos over the failure of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #1
They violated Trump's Law of Transactions. Midnight Writer Jul 2020 #6
What a big baby, whine, whine, whine PatSeg Jul 2020 #2
Whiney Republicans are a dotardly disgrace Champp Jul 2020 #3
the operative word is deference... agingdem Jul 2020 #4
No, not at all. SammyWinstonJack Jul 2020 #5

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,776 posts)
1. He must be soiling his Underoos over the failure of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 11:51 AM
Jul 2020

to do what he appointed them to do (or thought they would do).



PatSeg

(47,539 posts)
2. What a big baby, whine, whine, whine
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 11:54 AM
Jul 2020

Ask Bill Clinton about that 'broad deference' or the ghost of Richard Nixon.

agingdem

(7,850 posts)
4. the operative word is deference...
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 11:59 AM
Jul 2020

he's saying...courts in the past have kissed my ass...not this time...what good is court- packing if they don't rule in my favor???

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Courts in the past have ...