Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 01:32 PM Jul 2020

USC Removing John Wayne Exhibit After Student Protests Over Actor's Racist Comments

USC’s School of Cinematic Arts will remove its John Wayne exhibit after months of students and alumni protesting keeping such a tribute to the actor endorsed white supremacy. Protests over the exhibit followed resurfaced racist comments by the actor in a 1971 Playboy magazine interview.

The removal of the exhibit, dedicated to the actor who attended the university and played football in the 1920s, was announced Friday by Evan Hughes, the assistant dean of diversity and inclusion.

"Conversations about systemic racism in our cultural institutions along with the recent global, civil uprising by the Black Lives Matter Movement require that we consider the role our School can play as a change maker in promoting antiracist cultural values and experiences. Therefore, it has been decided that the Wayne Exhibit will be removed."

Hughes noted that materials from the exhibit, created in 2012, will be moved to the school’s Cinematic Arts Library for research and scholarship, along with other Hollywood artifacts to "allow scholarship to continue on the role John Wayne's films played in the history of cinema."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/usc-removing-john-wayne-exhibit-after-student-protests-over-actors-racist-comments/ar-BB16ClMg?li=BBnb7Kz

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USC Removing John Wayne Exhibit After Student Protests Over Actor's Racist Comments (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP
good llashram Jul 2020 #1
He was a racist and un-American. A fascist supporter rockfordfile Jul 2020 #2
Good call. Remove from prominence but leave for posterity. Caliman73 Jul 2020 #3
I wonder how many remember John Wayne was never in the military? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 #5
This is from the Daily Mail so take it for what it is worth. Caliman73 Jul 2020 #6
Wayne was 34, and exempted on age. He was also classified as 3-A as he had a family. stopbush Jul 2020 #7
No problem with this. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #4

rockfordfile

(8,704 posts)
2. He was a racist and un-American. A fascist supporter
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 01:56 PM
Jul 2020

John Wayne supported the Vietnam war knowing it was based on a lie. He called it a conservative cause.

Caliman73

(11,744 posts)
3. Good call. Remove from prominence but leave for posterity.
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 02:15 PM
Jul 2020

I think that we tend to idolize celebrities without critical thought. It is a failing of our thinking that has a negative effect on society.

Wayne to me, was more of a made up icon than anything real. His acting wasn't great, but what he was portrayed as was important for society at the time of the cold war when "being American" was a binkie to people scared of the "Reds" and social change. He is a reflection on society more than anything special.

I think Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are fairly talented actors and writers, "Good Will Hunting" was a very good movie in my opinion. I tend to agree with their politics as well. However, I don't give any more credence to their views or their words. I may say, I agree, or "he makes a good point", but you will never see me use the words of a celebrity as "proof" of anything or as a definitive fact. They are actors, they are rich, they have maybe some more free time and resources to look into things, but they are not experts.

I never understood the worship of celebrity. I mean I thought Prince was one of the best musicians of the modern pop/rock age. He was super talented, played multiple instruments, and wrote and performed some very good music. Again, what he thought about the world, politics, religion, etc... was not what I liked him for.

Obviously if talented musicians, actors, athletes, etc... have views that are repulsive and damaging to society and they use the platform they are given to promote those destructive views, then something needs to be done to counteract that damage. I personally think that we should not be giving celebrities that much importance to begin with.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
5. I wonder how many remember John Wayne was never in the military?
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 02:17 PM
Jul 2020

He was of prime age during WWII. Were there medical reasons?

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
7. Wayne was 34, and exempted on age. He was also classified as 3-A as he had a family.
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 02:54 PM
Jul 2020

He wanted to enlist but JohnFord worked behind the scenes to keep his only A-list actor in films.

Wayne was married three times, with all of his wives being Latina.

From Wikipedia: “America's entry into World War II resulted in a deluge of support for the war effort from all sectors of society, and Hollywood was no exception. Wayne was exempted from service due to his age (34 at the time of Pearl Harbor) and family status (classified as 3-A – family deferment). Wayne repeatedly wrote to John Ford saying he wanted to enlist, on one occasion inquiring whether he could get into Ford's military unit, but consistently kept postponing it until after "he finished just one or two pictures".[36] Wayne did not attempt to prevent his reclassification as 1-A (draft eligible), but Republic Studios was emphatically resistant to losing him since he was their only A-list actor under contract. Herbert J. Yates, President of Republic, threatened Wayne with a lawsuit if he walked away from his contract,[37] and Republic Pictures intervened in the Selective Service process, requesting Wayne's further deferment.[38]

U.S. National Archives records indicate that Wayne, in fact, did make an application[39] to serve in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), precursor to the modern CIA, and had been accepted within the U.S. Army's allotted billet to the OSS. William J. Donovan, OSS Commander, wrote Wayne a letter informing him of his acceptance into the Field Photographic Unit, but the letter went to his estranged wife Josephine's home. She never told him about it. Wayne toured U.S. bases and hospitals in the South Pacific for three months in 1943 and 1944.[40] with the USO.[41][42][43] During this trip, he carried out a request from Donovan to assess whether General Douglas MacArthur, commander of the South West Pacific Area, or his staff were hindering the work of the OSS.[20]:88 Donovan later issued Wayne an OSS Certificate of Service to memorialize Wayne's contribution to the OSS mission.

By many accounts, his failure to serve in the military later became the most painful part of his life.[36] His widow later suggested that his patriotism in later decades sprang from guilt, writing: "He would become a 'superpatriot' for the rest of his life trying to atone for staying home."[45]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»USC Removing John Wayne E...