General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"None of Them Will Ever Know Hunger, or Financial Fear... Yet They Are Full of Resentment."
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2012093818/radical-rich-romney-re-occupyThe Radical Rich: Moving From Romney To Re-Occupy
By Richard (RJ) Eskow
September 19, 2012 - 12:00am ET
Two recent movements have transformed the political landscape. The Occupy movement literally operates in the light of day. The other movement operates in secrecy, with money as its "speech" rather than ... well, you know, speech.
The Romney video offers us a rare glimpse of the other movement. This movement of the extremely rich is full of rage, ruthless, and radical. And it's on the rise.
If you're not scared, you're not paying attention.
- snip -
The bile flows out of this unscripted Romney. He says of his father, the governor, presidential candidate and car company CEO: "Had he been born of Mexican parents, I'd have a better shot of winning this." This kind of resentment, as absurd as it is, is a very real emotion for the Radical Rich.
- snip -
But that doesn't mean they're not enjoying life. They've acquired a level of wealth, power and luxury which ancient pharaohs and kings could never imagine: Their private jets will take them anywhere on the planet at a few minutes' notice. Rulers of nations flatter and court them. They even seem to be above the law. None of them will ever know hunger, or financial fear, or be denied medical care because they can't pay for it.
And yet they're filled with resentment.
MORE[p]
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Once you set the acquisition of stuff as your metric for success, you fail. Someone will always have something you don't have and there's no real satisfaction in acquiring things just for the sake of having them. It will always be an empty quest for more, more, MORE!
unblock
(52,227 posts)don't know who to attribute this observation to, but it's a good one, and explains a lot.
the real problem is the half-truth that the super-rich worked hard for their money.
for the most part, the DID work really hard. but they attribute too much of their wealth to hard work and not nearly enough to extremely fortunate circumstances and a knack for taking the lion's share of the loot.
just one example, the vast majority of non-startup ceos who made oodles and oodles from stock options sat atop companies that would have done quite well regardless. it's true that no single person has more influence on a company than the ceo, but much of their success can be attributed to government actions, competitors' actions, shifting customer tastes, and of course the stellar work of employees.
much of that success may be due to a brilliant idea from some division head, or rather from an worker in that division. the ceo approves the idea and the company stock price doubles. the ceo gets tens of millions of dollars, and the division head gets a nice bonus of maybe a few hundred thousand. and the actual low-level worker who came up with the brilliant idea gets an employee of the year plaque and maybe a $500 check. woo-hoo!
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)...successful. It's more than just hard work.
renate
(13,776 posts)They also had perks that the woman working the drive-through at the Dairy Queen doesn't get, such as not having to be on their feet all day, but unless they inherited their wealth or CEO-ship, I'm sure they did work hard.
The part that really gets under my skin is that they seem to assume that income is exactly proportionate to how hard a person works, and that a person working 12 hours a day for minimum wage earning $100 a day somehow still isn't working as hard as they do for 8 hours (or even 12 hours) for $5,000 a day. I don't know whether they believe it, or whether they just haven't sullied their beautiful minds with what working-class people do all day, but they do imply it.
That's what drives me up the wall--the implication that people doing backbreaking labor or a stressful desk job aren't working hard.
(P.S. I'm certainly not disagreeing with you, by the way--just venting!)
freshwest
(53,661 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)of the diminishing returns of wealth relative to personal happiness. Which isn't news at all. I just wish, one of these decades, we could call off this failed exercise of profit maximization tilted to benefit of the tiny (and often miserable anyway) ownership class. Perhaps later in the century...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The bodies will notice.
barbtries
(28,794 posts)you gotta wonder about people who will never want for anything begrudging others even food, shelter, health care. there's a real sickness in this country and i hope it can be brought under control before the whole experiment fails.
AnneD
(15,774 posts)"It is easier for a camel to pass though the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)thank goodness I was drinking water!!!!
Edited to add...ten commandments-stone, Joseph Smith's tablets-golden plates. Hmmm
TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)... breeding ever-smaller camels and building ever-larger needles.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Cha
(297,230 posts)RJ Eskow's piece is riveting.
And, they sure as hell don't want to pay for roads, bridges, the military that they want to send to war. And, they damn sure have already forgotten about the VETS! EITHER.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)...to the point where they wanted to be seen as contributing to charity to a culture within the elite that HATES the poor for EXPECTING them to "hand it over."
They feel it's robbery. Plain and simple. Robbery of their money though the use of guilt trips when they don't feel they have done anything to feel guilty for. This sentiment has permeated their entire class.
They see a majority of the country as being a danger to them now and that can lead to something really ugly, especially since Mitt managed to screw up.
I bet some are thinking of a plot that I won't mention here but we all know what I'm referring to....
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)They just don't want to pay the people back what they stole from us. They've concocted this rhetoric which essentially accuses the poor of being the lazy, shiftless, dependent freeloaders the radical rich is.
Shrinks call it Freudian projection. I call it the superrich pot calling the poor kettle black.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 19, 2012, 05:58 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021379453jsr
(7,712 posts)freefall
(662 posts)ananda
(28,860 posts)And that is a very brutal process.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)into one of their exalted "quiet rooms". The more I see of their lives, their views on this country and its citizens, the more I despise these mother fuckers.
freefall
(662 posts)Cha
(297,230 posts)The Head Repugnant.
Thanks for the link, Hissyspit..
Mitt and his TAX RETURNS
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)Thanks for the thread, Hissyspit.
hue
(4,949 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)WestWisconsinDem
(127 posts)These bastards are doing little more than "run up the score." They've already got more than they and their families could ever possibly use, but still they've got to have more, more, more- I suppose, just for the sake of having it.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)The most angry and resentful guy he interviewed was the billionaire:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101634576
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)If we didn't need the money, we'd STILL have to do it.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Which is why the polls can be 100 percent Obama and I would still be on the edge of my seat.
We are used to Millionaires, the occasional Billionaire, but we are not prepared for the fact that there are enough Billionaires around that can coordinate their power. They have as little connection to the world we live in as the Bourbons and Rothschilds did to their day, actually, less. If an old aristocrat bankrputed their country, they knew their power would be lessened. This new, global breed of aristo does not need a home country, and frankly can drop them easier than they can drop a cheap gown.
Think of Peter Thiel, who is outright working on building a nation stae in the waters.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024761/Atlas-Shrugged-Silicon-Valley-billionaire-reveals-plan-launch-floating-start-country-coast-San-Francisco.html
We are literally talking about someone trying to make a nation based on Ayn Rand. A real life "going Galt." Of course, unlike the old empires, they dare not try this in the wilderness,, no,they know that, even if they say "fuck America" every day, they can go into the US mainland, and expect complete and utter deference!
Of course, let's look at Dubai, where the rich can have their own islands made, and even has slave labor.
The point is, the Billionaires are so used to getting their own way, they do not care if every American would hate Romney ala Ben Ladin...they do not care, because they are used to knowing that one way or another, they will always get exactly what they want.
Unless we stop them, that is.
Raine
(30,540 posts)resentful and bitter and feeling like they are victimized by people with less. IMO they believe that whatever "the lessers" have came out of their pockets and they spend all their time scheming to get it.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)A lot of great industrialists died thinking they were great men. They only didn't live long enough to know they became the villain. Just as these people are trumpeting today. Still thinking they are God's gift when they are clearly destroying the future of every living thing on this planet. All for some extra homes, jet rides and expensive clothes. I guess, enjoy the ride while it lasts.
Some people actually have a calling to make the world a better place because of them, or at the very least, try not to make it too much worse. Sad that can't be a goal to be admired anymore. Only scoffed and belittled.