Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(15,729 posts)
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 07:24 AM Jul 2020

Who Actually Wants Trump to Send in the Feds? Police Unions.

Published Jul. 21, 2020 3:49AM ET

PORTLAND—Leaders of cities like Portland and Chicago publicly say they don’t want federal law enforcement policing protesters. But as President Donald Trump threatens to send in the troops to a handful of America’s largest cities, some of those same locales’ police unions appear to be circumventing elected officials to work with the feds.

On Monday, Trump indicated a desire to send federal law enforcement to New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore, and Oakland, apparently to crush protests there because police are “restricted from doing anything.” His remarks came after federal agents—revealed to be Customs and Border Protection in camouflage uniforms—were deployed to Portland, Oregon, where they faced outcry for shooting a less-lethal projectile into an activist’s head and shoving protesters into unmarked vans.

Although Portland leadership roundly decried the federal presence, the president of Portland’s police union met with the head of the Department of Homeland Security last week to discuss the agents, apparently without the knowledge of the city’s police chief. The president of Chicago’s police union made his own envoys, asking Trump for federal intervention.

Trump might have heard him: 150 federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations are gearing up to head to the city, the Chicago Tribune first reported. Either way, protesters say local cops and the feds are clearly colluding.

Snip

https://www.thedailybeast.com/police-unions-tell-trump-to-send-in-the-feds-to-cities-like-portland-and-chicago

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FakeNoose

(32,777 posts)
3. When it comes to police unions, I'm anti-union
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 08:02 AM
Jul 2020

There I said it, and I won't take it back. I live in Pittsburgh which is probably the most pro-union city we will ever see in the USA. Collective bargaining has its place, but police unions have abused their power. Nowadays they're mostly using mob mentality to keep people in line and to maintain status within municipal political regimes. It's time to outlaw these groups, and find other ways for law enforcement employees to be heard. Police unions are way out of line and this is the proof, in case anybody needed it.

sop

(10,265 posts)
5. I support collective bargaining, but only over wages, benefits, pensions and working conditions.
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 08:57 AM
Jul 2020

Police unions long ago crossed that line, using the implied threat of societal lawlessness and anarchy if they are not allowed to dictate and carry out their own public policy, ignoring the authority of locally elected officials.

Crunchy Frog

(26,647 posts)
10. I don't even think they're valid unions.
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 10:50 AM
Jul 2020

They're making policy by circumventing elected officials, and their local communities. They need to be disbanded if it's still possible as they are becoming a completely rogue element.

5X

(3,972 posts)
4. This is the true deep state.
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 08:11 AM
Jul 2020

Barr is effectively federalizing the local police forces. If they are inviting them in,
we are in deep shit.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,448 posts)
8. Cops aren't workers. They produce nothing and their presence undermines their mission.
Tue Jul 21, 2020, 09:31 AM
Jul 2020

Having a CBA doesn't make you part of the Labor movement.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who Actually Wants Trump ...