Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,107 posts)
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 03:16 PM Jul 2020

The Myth of 'Bloody Mary'

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/myth-bloody-mary-180974221/

The first woman to rule England in her own right didn’t simply inherit the throne. She seized it with unprecedented ambition from those who sought to thwart her.

Historian Sarah Gristwood describes the ascension of Mary I as a “staggeringly bold” course of action undertaken with little chance of success. Still, she rode into London on August 3, 1553, to widespread acclaim. In the words of one contemporary chronicler, “It was said that no one could remember there ever having been public rejoicing such as this.”

Centuries later, however, the Tudor queen is remembered as one of the most reviled figures in English history: “Bloody Mary.” This is a story of how a heroic underdog became a monarch who was then mythologized as a violent despot—despite being no bloodier than her father, Henry VIII, or other English monarchs. It’s a tale of sexism, shifting national identity and good old-fashioned propaganda, all of which coalesced to create the image of an unchecked tyrant that endures today.

***

Born on February 18, 1516, Mary was not the long-awaited son her parents, Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, had hoped for. But she survived infancy and grew up in the public eye as a beloved princess—at least until her teenage years, when her father’s infatuation with Anne Boleyn led him to divorce her mother and break with the Catholic Church. Declared illegitimate, downgraded from the title of “princess” to “lady,” and separated from her mother, Mary refused to acknowledge the validity of her parents’ divorce or her father’s status as head of the Church of England. It was only in 1536, after Anne’s execution and Henry’s marriage to Jane Seymour, that Mary finally agreed to her mercurial father’s terms.

*snip*
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Siwsan

(26,263 posts)
2. I'm reading 'Elizabeth - The Struggle for the Throne' by David Starkey
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 03:51 PM
Jul 2020

I'm at the point where Mary is married to Philip of Spain, just realized she wasn't actually pregnant, and found out her husband wasn't quite the man she had hoped he would be.

According to Starkey - and pretty much every other Tudor biography I've read (which number in the WHOLE LOTS category because it's my favorite era of history) - Mary was heir, then wasn't (the birth of Elizabeth and then Edward) then was (Henry's last will returned her and Elizabeth to the succession) then wasn't (Edward VI's will removed her and Elizabeth) so in the end she took what she felt was due her, by divine right.

Edward didn't think women could/should reign but the family line seriously lacked in males. The only other acceptable candidate, to him, was his cousin Jane Grey (granddaughter of Mary, Henry's youngest sister). He actually married off his female cousins before he died, with the hope one of them would produce a male heir before he died of consumption. Unfortunately, he died soon afterwards.

And, yes, Mary was pretty bloody, but no more than those before and after her reign. However, the one execution that, IMHO, makes the 'bloody' description appropriate was the execution of the 17 year old, '9 day Queen', Jane Grey. She was a total innocent whose fate was out of her control. The description of her execution is heartbreaking. And Elizabeth came so very close to meeting the same fate.

But, when all was said and done, the Golden Elizabethan Age began.

mcar

(42,334 posts)
6. For some reason, I love English history
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 05:41 PM
Jul 2020

should hate them, being of Irish extraction, but there you are.

Loved Wolf Hall and the different series about that time - War of the Roses and after. But I've never read much about Mary. I'll have to rectify that.

Siwsan

(26,263 posts)
8. Both Mary and Elizabeth are absolutely fascinating, for entirely different reasons
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:01 PM
Jul 2020

Mary's entire reign was focused on restoring her religion to the nation, her husband, desire to have a child and fear of her sister. She was never fully focused on England and her emotional ties were to Spain.

Elizabeth learned from the mistakes of the people in her life and, although making mistakes, still did a much better job of reigning than her sister because Elizabeth's passion and focus was on England.

Being of Welsh blood, myself, I love that Elizabeth spoke Welsh, and always had her 'Tudor Taffia' (Welsh gentry) around her, from the beginning of her reign, until the end.

trueblue2007

(17,220 posts)
13. I LOVE BRITISH HISTORY also. was required to read a biography sophomore year
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 07:22 AM
Jul 2020

i was 16...... now i'm 65!!! been reading english. scottish, french, russian and us history since. lolol .... i can name all the british monarchs from HENRY II on ......
my big claim to fame.

oh and i can tell you yucky stories about the kings and queens that may not be in the history books. that is what you learn when you immerse yourself in fiction and non fiction history.

be sure to catch OUTLANDER .... BOOKS AND THE TV PROGRAM. Scottish, French, English and American history.

ELIZABETH I is one of my favorites.

mcar

(42,334 posts)
15. I've read all the Outlander books and watched the series
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 09:24 AM
Jul 2020

We also enjoyed the "Princess" movies, also on Starz.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
10. The dubious thing about Edward naming Jane to succeed him was her mother was still alive
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:22 PM
Jul 2020

Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2020, 09:22 AM - Edit history (1)

Frances Grey was Edward's first cousin, and the one surviving child of his aunt Mary (if Edward had allowed a Catholic to succeed him, it ought to have been Mary, Queen of Scots, since her grandmother Margaret was older than her sister Mary).

But Edward named Frances's [not Mary's, as previously written) daughter Jane; this may have been because the Duke of Northumberland, Edward's most powerful minister, was Jane's brand-new father-in-law. Edward at first specified just any sons Jane might have (a male-only rule that would at least justify leaving out Frances too), but then as he grew seriously ill, he put Jane in first - but not Frances too. So the whole thing smells of a power-grab by Northumberland. It's notable that Northumberland was executed well before Jane or his son Guildford (who were still teenagers) - he was seen as the leader of that faction. They were only executed when there was a further rebellion against Mary.

Siwsan

(26,263 posts)
11. Bingo on Jane's husband
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:32 PM
Jul 2020

I think Jane is one of the most sympathetic historical figures. The description of her, blindfolded, frantically feeling around to find the block, at her execution, is heartbreaking.

I just noticed that Frances Grey died the year after Elizabeth came to the throne. Her niece, Margaret, lived until 1596.

One has to give it to Mary of Scotland. She never gave up trying to take the English throne!! I know a lot of people see her as a very sympathetic character. I'm an exception. She was absolutely fascinating but not someone I admire.

trueblue2007

(17,220 posts)
14. LADY JANE GREY was not the daughter of Henry VIII's sister Mary (Duchess of Suffolk)
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 07:29 AM
Jul 2020

Jane Grey was the daughter of Frances Grey who was the daughter of Mary D of Suffolk


Frances Grey, Duchess of Suffolk (née Lady Frances Brandon; 16 July 1517 – 20 November 1559), was an English noblewoman, the second child and eldest daughter of King Henry VIII's younger sister, Princess Mary, and Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk. She was the mother of Lady Jane Grey, de facto Queen of England and Ireland from 10 July until 19 July 1553,[1] as well as Lady Katherine Grey and Lady Mary Grey. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Grey,_Duchess_of_Suffolk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Jane_Grey


Lady Jane Grey (c.?1537[3] – 12 February 1554), also known as Lady Jane Dudley (after her marriage)[4] and as "the Nine Days' Queen",[5] was an English noblewoman and de facto Queen of England and Ireland from 10 July until 19 July 1553.

Jane was the great-granddaughter of Henry VII through his younger daughter Mary, and was a first cousin once removed of Edward VI. She had an excellent humanist education and a reputation as one of the most learned young women of her day.[6] In May 1553, she married Lord Guildford Dudley, a younger son of Edward's chief minister John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland. In June 1553, Edward VI wrote his will, nominating Jane and her male heirs as successors to the Crown, in part because his half-sister Mary was Roman Catholic, while Jane was a committed Protestant and would support the reformed Church of England, whose foundation Edward claimed to have laid. The will removed his half-sisters, Mary and Elizabeth, from the line of succession on account of their illegitimacy, subverting their claims under the Third Succession Act.

After Edward's death, Jane was proclaimed queen on 10 July 1553 and awaited coronation in the Tower of London. Support for Mary grew very quickly, and most of Jane's supporters abandoned her. The Privy Council of England suddenly changed sides and proclaimed Mary as queen on 19 July 1553, deposing Jane. Her primary supporter, her father-in-law the Duke of Northumberland, was accused of treason and executed less than a month later. Jane was held prisoner in the Tower and was convicted in November 1553 of high treason, which carried a sentence of death—though Mary initially spared her life. However, Jane soon became viewed as a threat to the Crown when her father, Henry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk, got involved with Wyatt's rebellion against Queen Mary's intention to marry Philip II of Spain. Both Jane and her husband were executed on 12 February 1554.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
4. AcornTV has a series, "She-Wolves: England's Early Queens"
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 04:19 PM
Jul 2020

There are three episodes, covering 1) Matilda and Eleanor, 2) Isabella and Margaret, and 3) Jane, Mary, and Elizabeth. The series dispels a lot of the myths built up around these amazing women and their efforts to claim their rights in a male dominated world.

If you have access to Acorn TV streaming service, look for this series!

MFM008

(19,814 posts)
5. I have alot
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 05:38 PM
Jul 2020

Of sympathy for Mary.
Subjected to her fathers lunatic whims.
Her story made worse by the protestantism
Of the time.
Biggest mistake marriage to Phillip of Spain.
Elizabeth knew this and never let a man
Especially a foreigner
come between her and her people.

Siwsan

(26,263 posts)
9. Mary always had to contend with her more popular, younger, smarter sister.
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:14 PM
Jul 2020

Elizabeth so resembled her father, where as Mary was just like her mother, in so many ways. Contemporary comparisons are never in her favor.

It's interesting that they are buried in the same tomb. The inscription is: “Partners both in throne and grave, here rest we two sisters, Elizabeth and Mary, in the hope of one resurrection.”

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Myth of 'Bloody Mary'