General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussia announces they will move missiles and troops to western borders. This is the same exact thing
Link to tweet
?s=21
Link to tweet
?s=21
Russia announces they will move missiles and troops to western borders. This is the same exact thing that happened when Trump announced the troop pullout out of Germany last month
Huh! So Russia is sending more troops to challenge NATO/US near the borders, Trump announces that he is planning the withdrawal of troops from Germany, and Putin this week signed a decree giving him more flexibility in using nuclear weapons. Nothing to see
https://msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-sends-more-troops-west-challenging-us-nato-presence-near-borders/ar-BB156dgJ
Note Trump had a phone call with Putin on June 1 days before his announcement. This time Trump had a call w Putin a few days before beginning the pullout
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)jayfish
(10,039 posts)it would be even dumber for Russia to try this. Barring a nuclear exchange, Russia would get trounced by the full EU. It might even cease to exist in its current form.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Response to soothsayer (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
soryang
(3,299 posts)Dynamic Force Employment: A Vital Tool in Winning Strategic Global Competitions
https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2018/09/18/dynamic_force_employment_a_vital_tool_in_winning_strategic_global_competitions_113809.html
Trump is trying to repackage some of these changes which probably would have happened anyway into his damaging transactional approach to negotiations with allies, Germany in particular. Offering a "trip wire" strategy in Poland, or Latvia reminds me of the "phony war" in Poland early in WWII. I don't think anything more than a token force, and a mobile one that deploys periodically rather than permanently should ever be stationed on Russia's border. It's contrary really to the DFE intent. This OP seems somewhat inconsistent with the announcement of movement of some of these forces to Belgium.
Similar considerations went into the withdrawal of US forces from near the DMZ in South Korea and their withdrawal to Pyongtaek. Beyond this an actual removal of additional troops from South Korea is viewed dimly in defense circles, but the Trump administration kept implying it was under consideration while Congress implemented measures to block it.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)also I'm pretty sure the Pentagon and the few honorable IC's are watching the world's intel . .
Backseat Driver
(4,399 posts)said Big Daddy Putin to the littlest mushroom...
Nitram
(22,892 posts)election. Then Biden can start repairing ties with Europe and other allies all over the world the Trump has alienated.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)...than expected (or somewhere did cant recall the example).
Nitram
(22,892 posts)Spurred on by President Donald Trumps demand to pull troops out of Germany, the U.S. will bring about 6,400 forces home and shift about 5,600 to other countries in Europe, U.S. defense leaders said Wednesday, detailing a Pentagon plan that will cost billions of dollars and take years to complete.
The future of the plan is uncertain, at best, since it relies on support and funding from Congress, and a number of members have voiced opposition. And it may not survive at all if Trump isnt re-elected.
Lawmakers have condemned the troop cuts as a gift to Russia fueled by Trumps spite at Germany.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/officials-us-to-bring-6400-troops-home-from-germany/2020/07/29/293f7af4-d19c-11ea-826b-cc394d824e35_story.html