General Discussion

kpete

(72,024 posts) Fri Jul 31, 2020, 12:26 PM Jul 2020

Ka-boom. Fauci drops some science truth bombs re: hydroxychloroquine

Ka-boom. Fauci drops some science truth bomb on @RepBlaine. Just cuz it’s peer reviewed and on internet doesn’t make it right. Study quality and design matters. If only there was a body of experts that reviews that... (checks notes)... oh, the FDA! Which blocked HCQ use

Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer pushes idea that hydroxychloroquine can be an effective treatment for COVID-19 and cites a study.

Fauci: "That was a flawed study."

@RepBlaine: It was peer-reviewed.

Fauci: You can peer-review anything; this was not randomized, placebo-controlled.

Link to tweet

?s=20

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ka-boom. Fauci drops some science truth bombs re: hydroxychloroquine (Original Post) kpete Jul 2020 OP

RE: The Ford Health study? underpants Jul 2020 #1

Tweet not accessible dhol82 Jul 2020 #2

hopefully fixed it kpete Jul 2020 #3

Beautiful. Thanks. dhol82 Jul 2020 #5

We've been "dropping truth bombs" about hydroxychloroquine for months now. It doesn't get Squinch Jul 2020 #4

underpants

(182,942 posts)

1. RE: The Ford Health study?

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Fri Jul 31, 2020, 12:27 PM

Jul 2020

dhol82

(9,353 posts)

2. Tweet not accessible

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Fri Jul 31, 2020, 12:33 PM

Jul 2020

Any way to open it up?

kpete

(72,024 posts)

3. hopefully fixed it

Reply to dhol82 (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 31, 2020, 12:37 PM

Jul 2020

Link to tweet

?s=20

dhol82

(9,353 posts)

5. Beautiful. Thanks.

Reply to kpete (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 31, 2020, 01:35 PM

Jul 2020

Squinch

(51,026 posts)

4. We've been "dropping truth bombs" about hydroxychloroquine for months now. It doesn't get

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Fri Jul 31, 2020, 01:05 PM

Jul 2020

through. And that's because they don't want it to.

No matter how much Fauci says it, they'll keep spewing their mouth dribbles about it.

They probably won't take it if given the chance, but they'll keep saying their savior was correct and it's a great drug.

I think we should just say to anyone who defends it, "you should definitely take it then, if this is what you believe. Here. I have a dose right here."

Reply to this discussion