General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHrrrmmmm (Mitt's tax return discrepancy alert)
Josh Marshall
Rick Newman notes that when Romney released his preliminary 2011 tax return estimates in January he was reporting $20,901,075 in adjusted gross income. The final returns released today show $13,696,961 in adjusted gross income.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/09/hrrrmmmm_1.php
The Mysteries in Mitt Romney's Tax Return
<...>
The most likely explanation is that Romney's accountants transferred income from Romney's personal return to one of the three trusts that also generate considerable income, almost all of it from investments. It will take a detailed examination of the 2010 and 2011 documents to figure out what changed, but here's a clue: Romney's campaign has begun to focus on the "personal" tax rate paid by Romney, rather than the tax rate that might be associated with the trusts and his total income from all sources.
This matters because Romney is subject to a very low tax rate as it is, since most of his earnings come from investments, which are taxed at a lower rate than wages. Romney hasn't released tax documents prior to 2010, but some tax experts think his overall tax rate could have been very close to zero during at least a couple of years, possibly because of capital losses suffered during the stock-market wipeout of 2008, which zeroed out earnings for many investors.
<...>
The Romney campaign now says that since 1990, "the lowest annual effective federal personal tax rate" Romney paid was 13.66 percent. In other words, the rate on what might be characterized as his personal income never fell below that threshold.
But that doesn't account for the three trusts, or other investment vehicles that may have existed prior to 2010. And it's unusual to limit the claim to "personal" taxes when Romney has acknowledged other types of income. So it's possible that the effective tax rate on the trusts was very low at some pointand maybe even zero, which would have indicated a net loss for the year.
- more -
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/09/21/the-mysteries-in-mitt-romneys-tax-return
What is Mitt hiding?
goclark
(30,404 posts)If Rmoney was nothing to hide why did it take so long?
flamingdem
(39,320 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)it takes time to "fix" things up; so they don't look too crooked .
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)PCIntern
(25,582 posts)Last fiscal year, I transferred 56,745,987,201.00 to my a numbered account in Swtizerland and they had the temerity to charge me FIFTY DOLLARS!!!!! For the transaction just because it was by wire. Big frigging deal....wire my ass! Just because I had to move 10% of my available funds doesn't mean that they can cheat me like this.
veganlush
(2,049 posts)adopt a fellow DU'er?
Applan
(693 posts)And give me ten percent?
bluerum
(6,109 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Release the tax returns, Mitt.
Cha
(297,629 posts)me..never mind tricky mitt's. Still, I'd like to understand and keep trying.. here's a piece from ThinkProgress that Asks just 10 Questions of mitt..
10 Questions Romney Must Answer About His Taxes
2. Why was your 2011 income $7 million lower than you estimated it to be in January? How does someone overestimate their income by $7 million?
The rest of the questions..
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/21/893211/questions-romney-taxes/
Thanks ProSense for this information you've been providing!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)goclark
(30,404 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)I assume that his holdings in Switzerland and Grand Cayman are not included on his return.