Or is that no longer required. He bragged about it in an interview. That could’ve been a false confession, a boast to impress his friends. Will they even investigate the shooting now? Would they have caught him without the interview online? Have they done ballistics on it? This stinks.

....but was never allowed to be adjudicated by the Rule of Law guaranteed us all.

He confessed.

He hid.

When discovered five days later, he tried to escape.

We don't know if he had a weapon.

We don't know how he could have been an imminent threat if he was running away.

He got in his car.

The LEO fired an alleged fifty shots at him.

He lay in the street for minutes with LEO milling around.

Then someone decided to do some CPR.

He's dead.

Barr takes a victory lap.

Joe Biden is going to have a lot of work to do to get us back to being the United States

An unsolicited on-camera admission... clear security footage and identification by family members aren’t enough?

They didn’t shoot Kyle Rittenhouse

Between recognizing a legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty in court... and questioning whether there’s any evidence after watching a video of the shooting and him admitting to it on film.

There’s no shortage of evidence.

The original video is awfully fuzzy... but the security camera images combined with the video make it crystal clear that he just walked right up and killed. Might not have been the initial instigator of the conflict... but can’t be spun as self-defense.

reason for the feds to not attempt to take him into custody.

The teenage killer was not shot on sight.

This is still the United States, with trials and juries, rule of law and all that. Cops are not judge, jury and executioners last I heard.

I merely corrected the perception that there might not be evidence that he actually killed the victim... when there are mountains of evidence.

...due process.

He stated that it was self defense.

Let that be proven or disproven in a court of law, on the evidence.

We don't adjudicate by firing squad here in America.

It’s so no one cop will have to take the blame, In my opinion

If he were fleeing, he wasnt a threat to that tactical team. He could have been arrested, and all that evidence submitted to the proper court where he would have been found guilty and sentenced.

If there was even a suggestion for a body instead of an arrest, my feeling at this point is it WILL see the light of day.

We don't know whether he was a threat to them or not (though he was clearly a threat not long before). There's just the assumption by some that law enforcement must be lying.

"Every time I see a big truck... I immediately think they're out to get me"

"Felt like the beginning of a war"

"I see a civil war right around the corner. That shot felt like the beginning of a war"

understand what was in his head if he had been interrogated.
Now we'll never know.
Convenient, that...

...press release from Barr.

And especially the cops and the Admin, have been into.

and they continued to fire on him, approx 50 rounds, and they do not even allege that he brandished or used a weapon during that time.

That's just a description of a summary execution. Expect them to introduce a new fact pattern pretty soon.

Sounds like an M.O. of a certain crime family from Queens, NY.

By the way, how's dear Giselle doing? The one that trump wished well? Awfully quiet recently. Hope she can still breathe.

Next up, Michael Cohen.

Next?

Updated Sep 04, 8:54 PM; Posted Sep 04, 11:00 AM

... He’s .. had several recent run-ins with police involving guns this summer.

Shortly after 2 a.m. on July 5, Portland police seized a 9mm handgun from him in downtown Portland and arrested him on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, as well as interfering with police and resisting arrest. While officers were struggling with him and trying to arrest him, the gun dropped from Reinoehl , according to police. He was cited and released, and it’s unclear if the gun was ever returned to him. Police haven’t responded to a public records request for the police report.

On July 26, Reinoehl tried to wrestle a gun away from a man who was involved in a skirmish downtown. Reinoehl was shot in the upper right arm when the man’s gun discharged during the chaotic brawl. The gun’s owner, Aaron Collins of Colton, said he ended up running from the scene and left his gun behind.

Reinoehl was also wanted on a failure to appear warrant stemming from a June 8 speed racing case in Baker County in eastern Oregon. He and his 17-year-old son were racing in two different cars at speeds of up to 111 mph heading east on Interstate 84 after midnight near North Powder, state police said. He was driving a Cadillac with his 11-year-old daughter as a passenger, police said. Inside the car, police said they found marijuana, “unidentified prescription pills” and a loaded Glock pistol for which Reinoehl didn’t have a concealed handgun license, state police said ...

https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2020/09/police-shooting-of-michael-reinoehl-what-we-know-about-fatal-encounter-with-fugitive-task-force-in-washington.html

And the lessons to be learned here may not be the immediate ones

Guy win Gun 2 (cop) shoots Guy 1 (black) seven times in the back. Protests follow. Guy with Gun 3 (member of organization with history of violence) crosses interstate lines with gun and bear spray to confront protestors. Guy with Gun 4 (with history of gun violations) arms self to protect protestors. Guys with Guns 3 and 4 meet; the encounter seems to have been unfriendly; and Guy with Gun 4 shoots Guy with Gun 3 twice, exploding the can of bear spray and causing fatal chest wound. Guy with Gun 4 then flees; warrant is sworn. Now more Guys with Guns (cops) track down Guy with Gun 4 and shoot at him 30 to 50 times as he flees. Guy with Guns 4 dies

Numerous appropriate questions can be asked about every chapter of this sad saga. Under what circumstances is it appropriate to shoot someone in the back seven times? Under what circumstances is it appropriate to cross interstate lines, with arms, to visit without invitation those with whom one strongly disagrees? Under what circumstances is it appropriate to repeatedly ignore gun laws? Under what circumstances is it appropriate skirmish with armed opponents? Under what circumstances is it appropriate to shoot 30 to 50 rounds at a fleeing fugitive? Is there any common denominator to the various chapters here?

My interest lies solely in the possibility/probability that people of evil intent are giving orders to kill those who have not been allowed dur process, and in seeing ALL of the evidence come to light.

.

would have fabricated some "accident" in jail.

court while this guy is gunned down in secret.

... if he wanted to make his case in court, he could have gotten a lawyer and made arrangements to turn himself in.

Let alone simply executed?

This whole thread is a BS, paranoid, low grade conspiracy theory.

I'd say it belongs in "creative speculation" except that there is nothing very creative about it.

Oh, and by the way, if you shoot and kill someone, yes, the correct course of action is to turn yourself in. Not doing so is a badge of guilt.

... get a lawyer and make arrangements to turn himself in. Then he could make his case for self defense or whatever in a court of law.

Didn't do that. Wonder why?

Putin's thugs poison their advesaries...this fascist administration guns them down in cold blood.

Welcome to fascist amuriKKKa. This is who we are today.

Last edited Sat Sep 5, 2020, 06:52 PM - Edit history (1)

He specifically said he was not a member of Antifa in his interview with Vice. Antifa has no membership and is not an organization.