Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:02 PM Sep 2020

Books Like Woodward's Have a Very Short Lifetime as News

They get published and then the news media jumps on them. After a couple of days, you don't hear any more about them.

Timing is critical. A book by a respected political author that comes out close to an election has far more chance of influencing that election than the same book would have six months earlier. As we saw, Trump overrode everything having to do with the COVID-19 pandemic. He had the power to override those things, and did just that, over and over again.

So, right now, I'm listening to Joe Biden go hard after Trump on MSNBC, based on Woodward's revelations. It's now fodder for the election campaign. It was released at a very strategic time, when it has a strong chance to influence voters.

If released earlier, it would already be forgotten and nothing would have changed.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Books Like Woodward's Have a Very Short Lifetime as News (Original Post) MineralMan Sep 2020 OP
Funny, I was just thinking the same thing. ananda Sep 2020 #1
Exactly, and it keeps the bad news cycle on Trump Claustrum Sep 2020 #2
Oh yea, this was on purpose. n/t ms liberty Sep 2020 #3
And there are tapes Goonch Sep 2020 #4
I don't think that any amount of negative information about Trump Chainfire Sep 2020 #5
No reason to obsess on his supporters. They are a lost cause. This is about motivating us to vote, lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #23
These revelations 6 months ago Turbineguy Sep 2020 #6
Biden, the Democrats and the Lincoln Project won't let this go. dem4decades Sep 2020 #7
Now, now, I'm sure the armchair reporters and campaign managers know best... brooklynite Sep 2020 #8
Yes, especially with so many other anti-Chump books out recently. MoonRiver Sep 2020 #9
He could have changed the national conversation about Covid in February. If he had released Squinch Sep 2020 #10
Nah BannonsLiver Sep 2020 #12
So, given your position that acknowledging anyone else's culpability "gives Trump cover," Squinch Sep 2020 #16
In essence the BW enablers are similar in action to Trump GusBob Sep 2020 #24
I'm guessing it's hopelessly fun... LanternWaste Sep 2020 #39
It is. BannonsLiver Sep 2020 #40
It's changing the narrative away from Trump to Woodward. crimycarny Sep 2020 #17
I actually think there is a strategic plan ismnotwasm Sep 2020 #11
I think you've hit on it. Most Reptilicans have skeletons in their closets. lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #22
What would be interesting would be to see Republican leaders MineralMan Sep 2020 #30
The difference between us and them Should be MoonlitKnight Sep 2020 #13
?? So let's lose an election so that we remain morally pure? crimycarny Sep 2020 #18
Absolutely. This is timed very deliberately. nolabear Sep 2020 #14
you are right. see- michael wolf. ihas2stinkyfeet Sep 2020 #15
I agree, and I think this is at least a week too early Awsi Dooger Sep 2020 #19
I think that's a fair point. Unfortunately, now is the best time to release it, lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #20
I don't recall another book being released with audio of the interviews though. Vinca Sep 2020 #21
I don't really think that will give it any more news coverage, MineralMan Sep 2020 #27
+ a brazillion. nt tblue37 Sep 2020 #25
Yes good point GusBob Sep 2020 #26
It would have sold well whenever it was released. MineralMan Sep 2020 #28
Sir GusBob Sep 2020 #33
Please proceed. MineralMan Sep 2020 #34
Good point mcar Sep 2020 #29
Woodward didn't have to release his whole book but the data that the bug was airborne, deadly ... uponit7771 Sep 2020 #31
That information was available to anyone who was following the pandemic. MineralMan Sep 2020 #32
The virus being airborne was not NOT socialized on Feb 6th of this year, we didn't even know the ... uponit7771 Sep 2020 #35
Socialized? WTF? MineralMan Sep 2020 #37
In this context it means widely known or communicated information most of the time its behavior. My uponit7771 Sep 2020 #42
Please speak English, using commonly understood terms. MineralMan Sep 2020 #43
From free dictionary uponit7771 Sep 2020 #44
See my previous post. MineralMan Sep 2020 #47
we're in a confirmation period where all of the things generalized about Trump are being confirmed bigtree Sep 2020 #36
I hope it has a negative profit margin. Goodheart Sep 2020 #38
I wouldn't count on that. BannonsLiver Sep 2020 #41
Thanks Hekate Sep 2020 #45
9 hours of tapes. This book has more legs than a centipede grantcart Sep 2020 #46

ananda

(28,872 posts)
1. Funny, I was just thinking the same thing.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:04 PM
Sep 2020

Trump and the media are always blowing new dog
whistles that overwhelm the one before.

This really is good timing.

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
2. Exactly, and it keeps the bad news cycle on Trump
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:05 PM
Sep 2020

so that whatever BS Trump and the republicans cook up about Biden wouldn't get any traction.

Chainfire

(17,582 posts)
5. I don't think that any amount of negative information about Trump
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:09 PM
Sep 2020

will have any affect on his supporters. They are hunkered down in the bunker of denial. The more information that comes out, the more sure they are that their messiah is being unjustly persecuted.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
23. No reason to obsess on his supporters. They are a lost cause. This is about motivating us to vote,
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:06 PM
Sep 2020

and influencing a few people at the margins to either sit it out, or vote for Joe just to save their lives.

Turbineguy

(37,360 posts)
6. These revelations 6 months ago
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:09 PM
Sep 2020

did not have 180,000 dead people attached.

Not that the trumpsters give a shit.

Squinch

(50,986 posts)
10. He could have changed the national conversation about Covid in February. If he had released
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:12 PM
Sep 2020

the tapes then, there would be far fewer "covid is a hoax" cult members. There would have been fewer who believed trump and risked their lives to prove it. That would have saved lives.

Joe has plenty of things to go after trump about. I am glad he is reacting strongly to this news, but if Woodward had released the tapes in February, Joe could now certainly be reacting strongly to some other aspect of trump's covid genocide.

Woodward is a reporter. The president of the United States was lying to the American public about a deadly pandemic and putting ALL Americans in harm's way intentionally. Woodward knew this EIGHT months ago. He had tapes to prove it.

Woodward has blood on his hands.

And for those who are reacting as if saying this is somehow exonerating Donny Bodybags' willful genocide of Americans, get a grip.

BannonsLiver

(16,420 posts)
12. Nah
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:17 PM
Sep 2020

It would have been a fart in the wind. Only someone hopelessly naive would believe otherwise. Way to give Trump cover, though.

Squinch

(50,986 posts)
16. So, given your position that acknowledging anyone else's culpability "gives Trump cover,"
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:23 PM
Sep 2020

I take it you think DeSantis and Abbott and Reynolds, among others, are blame free for the death toll. Because if you acknowledged that they have any responsibility for deaths, that would be "giving trump cover."

See how that's dumber than a box of hammers?

There is trump, and there are those who enable trump.

Woodward enabled trump for 8 months while 190,000 people died. Only someone hopelessly naive would believe otherwise.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
24. In essence the BW enablers are similar in action to Trump
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:06 PM
Sep 2020

Playing politics over people's lives

Woodward is a different bastard though, he did it to sell books

The fact that he waited until closer to the election is to sell more books

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
39. I'm guessing it's hopelessly fun...
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 05:53 PM
Sep 2020

to pretend that opinions other than yours are "giving Trump over...", 'cause it sure as hell at grounded in fact, truth or reality.

crimycarny

(1,351 posts)
17. It's changing the narrative away from Trump to Woodward.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:54 PM
Sep 2020

The first death from COVID was March 10. In February there were no deaths yet, Fauci and all the experts, including WHO, were saying the virus wasn’t airborne and masks weren’t needed. Do you truly believe if Woodward had released that tape back on February 7th anyone would have paid attention?

Trump would have lied about his reasons for telling Woodward what he did. Say “well, right now it’s just theory, not confirmed. That’s what I meant.”

No, no one would have paid attention to Woodward without subsequent confirmation from our experts, who would have hemmed and hawed and downplayed for their own reasons. Whether it’s to make sure people don’t panic buy masks (Fauci), or whether to keep their jobs (Birx)...back when we had zero deaths and our own experts were downplaying the virus, no one would have listened to Woodward.

ismnotwasm

(41,998 posts)
11. I actually think there is a strategic plan
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:16 PM
Sep 2020

One thing after the other, hammering on Trumps incompetence and outright dangerous actions as a leader.

I’m not much for conspiracy, but I do wonder about high level Trump sycophants (looking at you Linsey Graham) and their behavior throughout this debacle.

With the ties to Epstein and the documented sexual proclivities of many Men in Power, makes me wonder how much blackmail was going around. I’ll never know I guess.

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
30. What would be interesting would be to see Republican leaders
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:19 PM
Sep 2020

who have supported him up to now turning tail and running from him now. Lindsey Graham, for example. He might well panic and flip on Trump to try and save his phony baloney job. I'd love to see that happen and have him still lose.

MoonlitKnight

(1,584 posts)
13. The difference between us and them Should be
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:17 PM
Sep 2020

That we don’t condone the needless deaths of 200,000 Americans just to score some points to win an election.

crimycarny

(1,351 posts)
18. ?? So let's lose an election so that we remain morally pure?
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:56 PM
Sep 2020

And allow Trump to kill more people with his policies after he wins 4 more years?

 

ihas2stinkyfeet

(1,400 posts)
15. you are right. see- michael wolf.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:19 PM
Sep 2020

whatever happened to that guy?

and no one who lived through 2020 will want to revisit it.
maybe in 50 yrs another generation will wonder wtf happened.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
19. I agree, and I think this is at least a week too early
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 02:59 PM
Sep 2020

Probably two weeks too early. I would have gotten it out there a week prior to the first debate.

Trump is already on defensive now. No matter how that first debate goes Trump could not gain much momentum if this story was brand new. In fact, the debate questioning was guaranteed to focus on this aspect.

Instead, in Trumpworld there could be multiple developments to straddle this over the next two weeks.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
20. I think that's a fair point. Unfortunately, now is the best time to release it,
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:02 PM
Sep 2020

if the goal is to save as many lives as possible. The only way to save lives is to boot out Turd and as many of his cronies as possible. Not much would have happened if these tapes had come out in February.

Vinca

(50,299 posts)
21. I don't recall another book being released with audio of the interviews though.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:02 PM
Sep 2020

That's the big difference between Woodward's book and the others. I agree with you most are just a flash in the pan, but I've always thought the one that would do the most damage was Woodward's and I had no idea he had the interviews records.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
26. Yes good point
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:08 PM
Sep 2020

He released the book closer to election in order to garner more attention and increase sales

Pretty craven though, considering all the deaths since March

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
28. It would have sold well whenever it was released.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:15 PM
Sep 2020

It will have a larger impact now than it would have before, though. Just watch. The release timing was deliberate, no doubt.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
33. Sir
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 04:31 PM
Sep 2020

He was telling the truth to Woodward and telling lies to the American public! ABOUT A DEADLY DISEASE

Are you telling me a reputable journalist should hide the truth too?

unbelievable

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
31. Woodward didn't have to release his whole book but the data that the bug was airborne, deadly ...
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:22 PM
Sep 2020

.. contagious and killin kids too would've made a difference in so many peoples lives in mid Feb for instance.

There were a lot of smart ways to get that information out to the public

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
32. That information was available to anyone who was following the pandemic.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 03:59 PM
Sep 2020

As the science was figured out, it was published. Trump just didn't admit that information. He didn't accept it, because it didn't fit his planning.

The fact that the virus was transmitted through droplets was covered in the news media. The fact that it was deadly was covered, too. I saw the information. I also saw that Trump was ignoring it. Others commented that he was ignoring it.

I don't know when the Woodward interviews took place, to tell you the truth. The interviews were all part of his book project, and he needed to be able to continue to interview Trump. So, he didn't reveal what Trump was saying in them, because doing that would have ended the interviews, which he wanted to continue.

He was planning a book. Books are time-consuming and require a lot of information. At least the kinds of books he writes do.

So, the information was out there, for anyone who wanted to get it. I don't know about you, but in February, I was already taking precautions to keep from getting infected. That was based on the information that was widely available. I had already isolated myself, stocked up on necessary items, and had accumulated a stock of masks, disinfecting stuff like wipes and hand sanitizers. I didn't stock up on toilet paper, but I had a giant Costco pack of Scott 1000 sheet rolls anyhow, since I buy that stuff in bulk. But the information was out there. Woodward wouldn't have scooped anyone. Trump was hiding it in his public speaking, but who trusted Trump in the first place.

Woodward accumulated the information he needed, wrote a long book containing that information, checked it over and over again, like all careful writers do, and it is finally in print. The timing might have been planned to coincide with the imminent election, and probably was. Woodward is smart about things like that, But the book was not finished in February. It was barely conceived of in February.

The information about COVID-19, though, was out there. I knew about it., and I'm not an insider. I follow the news very closely in many areas. Did you not know that COVID-19 was airborne and dangerous in February? I did. Did you not know that Trump was lying about it then? I did.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
35. The virus being airborne was not NOT socialized on Feb 6th of this year, we didn't even know the ...
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 05:36 PM
Sep 2020

.. dormancy of the bug at that date but Trump did.

He should've socilazied it to every American

The information about COVID-19, though, was out there. I knew about it.


I've said it in my other thread, people who frequent DU are more informed on issues than 95% of the 7 billion humans ... we're not regular when it comes to political information "I knew" from a DUr ... HUMBLY ... doesn't say much in this context of the nations information being socialized.

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
37. Socialized? WTF?
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 05:51 PM
Sep 2020

Are you talking about social media? Do you rely on social media for your news? If so, I suggest you expand your sources.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
42. In this context it means widely known or communicated information most of the time its behavior. My
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 06:00 PM
Sep 2020

... point is on Feb 6th it was not well know that the virus was airborne and it held dormant for a week.

Yes, you are more informed than the above average human especially when it comes to political issues.

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
43. Please speak English, using commonly understood terms.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 06:07 PM
Sep 2020

I don't deal with non-English speakers here unless they use their native language or write in standard English.

What do you think "socilazied" means.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
44. From free dictionary
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 06:17 PM
Sep 2020
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/socialized

so·cial·ize (sō?shə-līz?
v. so·cial·ized, so·cial·iz·ing, so·cial·iz·es
v.tr.

1. To place under government or group ownership or control: socialized medical care.
2. To cause to accept or behave in accordance with social norms or expectations: techniques to socialize aggressive children.

Used often in my field of work in the context of information

Either way, Feb 6th it was not well known throughout society the information Trump knew about the virus.

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
36. we're in a confirmation period where all of the things generalized about Trump are being confirmed
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 05:40 PM
Sep 2020

...this will cement in countless voters' minds.

The type is cast.

Goodheart

(5,334 posts)
38. I hope it has a negative profit margin.
Wed Sep 9, 2020, 05:53 PM
Sep 2020

At the start of a pandemic he's going to keep his trap shut for the sake of book profits seven months later? Fuck Bob Woodward. 190,000 Americans have died, and he could have helped make that number significantly lower.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Books Like Woodward's Hav...