General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSimple. If Turtle pushes through a nominee, we expand the court.
if he goes back on his word, then we can expand the court. He would violate a norm that he established.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)RockRaven
(15,019 posts)spooky3
(34,484 posts)Some Republicans at risk of losing their re-election bids may be very reluctant to have a vote, and if Mitch schedules one, may not vote to support a right wing nominee.
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)spooky3
(34,484 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)until Jan 3, when the new Senate session starts.
If we take over the Senate, watch them go nuts trying to pass crap in December.
Statistical
(19,264 posts)Trump will nominate someone, and Mitch will reverse himself and plow it through. It will be a perfect party line vote and they will get to stack the court.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)still_one
(92,433 posts)drray23
(7,638 posts)just a vote by congress.
still_one
(92,433 posts)to make it so
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/packing-the-supreme-court-explained
still_one
(92,433 posts)ellie
(6,929 posts)We must win in November.
still_one
(92,433 posts)beaglelover
(3,495 posts)or during tRump's lame duck session, then we expand the court to 15 and let Joe appoint all young progressive democrats.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Statistical
(19,264 posts)So it would require controlling the house, senate, and presidency but it can be done by with a simple majority if they change the senate rules.
I think it is more likely they will expand it to 11 but there is no limit, 11, 15, 31, 187 Supreme Court justices. The constitution doesn't specify the size of the court.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)controlling the House, Senate and Presidency doesn't sound so simple, but here's hoping (AND VOTING!).
Livluvgrow
(377 posts)Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. (us courts.gov)
OAITW r.2.0
(24,656 posts)We were in an election year back in 2016. Will he adhere to his own logic? Doubtful.
So, yeas, pack the Supreme Court when we take back the WH and Senate in 2021.
Chemisse
(30,817 posts)He is not a man of principle. He would do anything at all to get what he wants. Looking like a hypocrite is of no concern to him.
Demsrule86
(68,703 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)But if Turtle does this, I am all in.
barbtries
(28,811 posts)i felt that was needed even with Ginsburg alive.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)McConnell wants to play dirty so well have to as well.
Mitch is such a complete A-1 Dirtbag, so disingenuous. He threw it down when he turned down Merrick Garland because he said it was improper in the last year of a Presidential term...then said of course he would do that for Trump if the situation occurred.
So if we control it all lets add two members.
unblock
(52,352 posts)TheProle
(2,202 posts)He doesnt need to play his hand immediately on this.
Azathoth
(4,611 posts)And it needs to be delicately placed on the table as a warning.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)The GOP majority on the court is done with democracy. We should not allow them a forum from which to launch their assault.
dalton99a
(81,635 posts)or forever live under GOP rule
jcgoldie
(11,652 posts)And McConnell will take the blame for all of it.
dalton99a
(81,635 posts)Blue Owl
(50,523 posts)Would be Mitch McConnell's severed head