Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 08:51 AM Jan 2012

Bloomberg: Texas Voting Rights Clash Puts U.S. High Court in Election Fray

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-09/texas-voting-rights-clash-puts-u-s-high-court-in-election-fray.html



..snip..

The Texas case will determine the power of judges to redraw voting-district lines -- and will test the strength of a central provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act: its requirement that some states get federal “preclearance” before changing election rules. Texas is asking the high court to put in place three Republican-drawn maps for this year’s elections, even though they haven’t received that preclearance.

“It would essentially give a major way for states to circumvent the Voting Rights Act,” said Pamela Karlan, a professor at Stanford Law School who represents the Texas Mexican American Legislative Caucus, one of the groups battling the state’s Republicans in court.

...

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said the judges overstepped their bounds and should have deferred to the legislature’s plans in the absence of evidence that the state had violated the voting law. “Quite stunningly, what the lower court did was to issue a remedy without finding any wrong,” the Republican attorney general said in an interview.

The Supreme Court signaled last month that it is inclined to agree with that argument, temporarily blocking the San Antonio court’s interim maps from going into effect and agreeing to hear arguments.


..end..



Scuba's prediction: SCOTUS will decide in favor of the Republicans by a 5 - 4 margin. Wagers may be placed by sending me a private message.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 
1. "requirement that some states get federal “preclearance” before changing election rules. (???)
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 09:14 AM
Jan 2012

On the face of it, it appears that "some states" are being discriminated against.

 
4. It would appear that whoever is making the rules, has not been following the trends.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 09:37 AM
Jan 2012

I'm not advocating that any state should be discriminated against, but there is far more racism and discrimination in the north than there is in the south.

The 10 Most Segregated Urban Areas in America

1 Milwaukee
2 New York
3 Chicago
4 Detroit
5 Cleveland
6 Buffalo
7 St Louis
8 Cincinnati
9 Philadelphia
10 Los Angeles

http://www.city-data.com/forum/city-vs-city/1239202-10-most-segregated-urban-areas-america.html

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
5. The law was written singling out States that had a history of gerrymandering to prevent ....
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 09:41 AM
Jan 2012

... minorities from having a chance to win elections.



I know Milwaukee very well.

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
2. I don't take sucker bets.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 09:15 AM
Jan 2012

However, I will bet you that if Republicans sue to overturn a map in a Democratic-dominated state like California, those same 5 judges will twist themselves around to strike it down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bloomberg: Texas Voting ...