Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jorno67

(1,986 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:40 AM Sep 2012

Is the Romney disaster of 2012 deliberate?


6 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Yes! Everyone is in on it! That way the rethugs can claim it's not their policies but a weak candidate.
0 (0%)
Yes! But Romney doesn't know! They were afraid he'd mess it up if they let him in on it.
2 (33%)
No! What you are witnessing is for realsies! This is their best candidate giving his best effort with 100% support!
4 (67%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
2. No party wants to lose the presidency
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 12:02 PM
Sep 2012

You get to control foreign and defense policy; your (and your appointees') implementation of domestic policy has far reaching effects, and you get to make a lot of nominations, especially the Supreme Court.

A failing presidential candidates hurts other races too.

The other candidates the Repubs considered would have been even worse car crashes, in their own distinct ways. That party had just run out of electable candidates, due to their far-right swing.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
7. what ^^^^^^^ said. The Teabaggers screwed up the repuke party
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 01:16 PM
Sep 2012

and now they are dealing with it...by folding in on themselves

mattclearing

(10,091 posts)
4. He's the best of the worst.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 12:55 PM
Sep 2012

They had a weak field, partly because Obama is a strong incumbent and everyone knows it, even with the economy, but also because the GOP doesn't have any credible potential presidents.

It didn't help that each of their terrible candidates predictably fell over one another trying to stake out the most toxic positions possible in order to attract the favor of the most fearful, hateful right-wing shitbags, which is the core of the modern Republican Party.

There's nothing presidential about a party that has no defensible intellectual core, which panders to the least educated, most fanciful bunch of ignorami in the country.

Nothing about the modern Republican Party holds up to even glancing scrutiny. The slightest bit of critical thought or surface-scratching collapses their ideas on the economy, geopolitics, etc.

Romney's 47% remark is a perfect example. He's so dumb he doesn't realize that at least a third of those people had intended to vote for him. He thinks that everyone who relies on government is an Obama voter.

But it's like that everywhere you look, from global warming to creationism vs. evolution, austerity vs. Keynes, war vs. peace, Republican ideas are demonstrably flawed. Anyone with half a clue can see that.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
5. Since no serious GOP candidate threw their hat into the ring, I think it was clearing out deadwood.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 01:12 PM
Sep 2012

They just loaded all of the clowns into one car and let it drive itself off of a cliff. It isn't like the GOP doesn't have viable candidates. None of those wanted to go to the scrap heap. They let all of the morons take the fall.

 

Missycim

(950 posts)
6. This isn't over by a longshot
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 01:14 PM
Sep 2012

I hope I am not seeing overconfidence here.

The thing about the Polls I am worried about is the Bradley effect. With the number of people who keep their racism deep down inside them they might have lied to the pollsters.

Mz Pip

(27,453 posts)
9. Didn't seem to matter in 2008.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 01:19 PM
Sep 2012

The racists wouldn't have voted for Obama anyway and I doubt it's all that hard to just say they are Rmoney supporters.

Mz Pip

(27,453 posts)
8. No, but it did give the plutocrats
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 01:18 PM
Sep 2012

an opportunity to see just how much their money could buy. They really woukld have been thrilled if it made a difference but so far it hasn't.

I have a friend in Ohio who says she gets 2-3 robo-calls an hour. All the money is doing is annoying people with endless adsa and phone calls. People have mute buttons on their TVs these days so they can turn off a lot of it.

Johonny

(20,888 posts)
10. No the 2012 GOP field, the current congress and the GOP governors are result of the same thing
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 02:05 PM
Sep 2012

They are all a result of the same GOP policy of letting a few billionaires and think tanks gain total control of the party. It is also a result of the American business CEO culture where the top of American business are divorced from any real knowledge of their industry. They are people the went to school to be corporate front office people and thus not people actually involved in the industry. Romney shows the classic total detachment from the American economy, business, social, political interests that most Americans want, understand and feel. Gone is any real input by average people. Gone are any real stances on real issues that would impact the average voter. The party is composed of girfters and the delusional corporate investment class wealthy. Romney isn't a mistake, he is a guy that reminds the real power brokers in the GOP of themselves. He is who they are, and who they think Americans want.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the Romney disaster of...