Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:50 PM Sep 2012

Mitt Romney really doesn't want voters to know how many servants he has or how much he pays them

Mitt Romney really doesn't want voters to know how many servants he has or how much he pays them

by Laura Clawson

Mitt Romney still doesn't want us to know how much household staff he has, or how much he pays them. To that end, he's outsourced his household help to a payroll company and is reporting payroll taxes quarterly, so none of it shows up on the 379 pages of 2011 tax returns he's released:

The Romney campaign said via email that the decision to file household help taxes separately was meant to make the Romneys' taxes easier to manage. "This method makes record-keeping easier," the spokesperson said.

But this simpler record keeping also shields Romney's household help arrangements from public scrutiny.

If it's tax-related and it shields Romney from scrutiny, the chances it was done coincidentally for other reasons are approaching nil.

Romney's 2010 tax returns showed he'd paid $20,603 in wages to four household employees, raising questions about just how many hours of what kind of work these four people were doing for which the Romneys were paying so little. Other questions that were raised included "Really? You have multiple large homes—mansions, even—in different states and you expect us to believe you don't have more staff?"

Romney's 2011 tax returns at least let us know the specifics of why we don't know what we don't know on this front: outsourcing to a payroll company and quarterly returns. But the big answer remains the same. Romney says he wants to represent us, to be our leader, to be in charge of job creation for the nation. But he doesn't want us to know how he handles job creation or pay in his own life.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/25/1136186/-Mitt-Romney-really-doesn-t-want-voters-to-know-how-many-servants-he-has-or-how-much-he-pays-them

Keep it up, Mitt. The ship is sinking, add another boulder.



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney really doesn't want voters to know how many servants he has or how much he pays them (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2012 OP
"You people would just try to make something out of it" annabanana Sep 2012 #1
Damn, she looks like she has been ProSense Sep 2012 #2
That's really interesting to me. Those payroll companies cost a fortune. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #3
I am sure they had full health insurance, 401K matching, pension, AFLAC ... central scrutinizer Sep 2012 #4
Kick! n/t ProSense Sep 2012 #5
I'd love to know more information. If he treats his (possibly) low wage employees like slaves... nc4bo Sep 2012 #6
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
3. That's really interesting to me. Those payroll companies cost a fortune.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:27 PM
Sep 2012

Full disclosure, as a small business owner I do my own through Quickbooks. But dayum, I'd love to "outsource" that job to someone else since payroll is a hassle. I constantly worry I'm not doing my quarterly taxes "right". But since I only have 10 employees, it makes financial sense for me to simply handle it myself.

It costs A LOT to have someone else do it but it is a whole heck of a lot easier - less headache, no worries.

I presume he does this because he doesn't handle any of his financial transactions himself PLUS it does really shield him from scrutiny.

I'll go further and say it probably means he has a LOT Of staff.

But I'm jealous.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
6. I'd love to know more information. If he treats his (possibly) low wage employees like slaves...
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:01 AM
Sep 2012

Would he also expect American citizens be accepting of the same treatment?

Low pay, minimal if any benefits at all, long hours, no overtime pay, no sick leave, etc.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney really doesn'...