General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Staff Play Bizarre Office Pool on Wildfires
Senate Staff Play Bizarre Office Pool on Wildfires
................
Its the job of congressional staffers working on energy and natural resources issues to know facts like this. But some of them have a more urgent and perverse interest in this particular statistic: theyre participants in a macabre annual office pool in which they try to predict how many acres of U.S. land will burn in wildfires.
Frank Gladics, a professional staffer on the Republican side of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, runs the contest. On Tuesday he sent out 2011s results in an email that was perhaps forwarded a little too widely. (Grist managed to obtain a copy, after all.) Participants in 2011 ranged from lowly legislative aides to powerful staffers, like Bruce Evans, the Republican staff director for the Senate Appropriations Committee. The entrants Grist identified all worked on the Senate side of the Hill.
A morbid version of a jellybean-counting contest, the pool asks staffers to guess the number of acres that will burn each year; guesses that exceed the actual number, as reported in the National Interagency Fire Center Situation Report (PDF), are disqualified.
At best, this little stunt could be excused as gallows humor a peculiar inside-the-Beltway bonding ritual for disaster wonks. Since wildfires level peoples homes, imperil both residents and firefighters, and serve as a barometer for climate-change-driven havoc, the annual game might also simply be tone-deaf, tasteless, and heartless.
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/01/09/399633/senate-staff-office-pool-wildfires/
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)SixthSense
(829 posts)and then actually does something about it?
and then OTHER people actually participate?
WTFF???
RZM
(8,556 posts)It's in our nature to make light of things. If you spend all day collecting data on wildfires, I think it's natural to have a little fun with it. It's not something you'd want to talk about with a family who lost their home in a wildfire, but I do think it's normal.
I can attest to the fact that a lot of historians crack jokes among one another in the context of some really sad history. Few would make the same joke to a person who experienced such things or had family family members that did, but among themselves, it's not unusual. That's why this doesn't really bother me. It was an in-joke not intended for public consumption.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)If they can I wonder if they do?