Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts) Thu Oct 4, 2012, 04:18 PM Oct 2012

The Three Top Lines of Attack Against Mitt Romney

1) He will say anything to get elected, his record proves it.

2) He doesn't trust the American people enough to show us any details; not about his taxes, not about his policies.

3) He's not leading the Republican Party, the Tea Party is leading him.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Three Top Lines of Attack Against Mitt Romney (Original Post) Tom Rinaldo Oct 2012 OP

Romney/Bully openminded56 Oct 2012 #1

1 Etcha Sketch 2 Chickenhawk foreign policy (again) 3 Untrustable KurtNYC Oct 2012 #2

I picked these because they are so easily documented plus they damn him as a person or a leader Tom Rinaldo Oct 2012 #3

openminded56

(19 posts)

1. Romney/Bully

Reply to Tom Rinaldo (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 04:23 PM

Oct 2012

I hope Obama mans up in the next debate, I know he has it in him but I really felt sorry for him last night. Romney, the bully, trounced all over Barack, it wasn't pleasant to watch.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)

2. 1 Etcha Sketch 2 Chickenhawk foreign policy (again) 3 Untrustable

Reply to Tom Rinaldo (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 04:30 PM

Oct 2012

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)

3. I picked these because they are so easily documented plus they damn him as a person or a leader

Reply to Tom Rinaldo (Original post)

Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:27 AM

Oct 2012

To me the way these issues reveal Romney as a person who is unfit to lead the nation are over arching. The policy stuff underscores the indictment. Other thoughts?

Reply to this discussion