General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the Conservatives of the 1% thought they could get away with reinstating slavery, would they?
13 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, while Whistling Dixie | |
10 (77%) |
|
No, while Humming The Battle Hymn of the Republic | |
3 (23%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Fgiriun
(169 posts)through debt slavery.
factsarenotfair
(910 posts)There is an abundant, free supply of debt slaves and they can dispose of them easily any time they want.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Much cheaper to use the endless supply serfs and just bring in new ones as the old ones die off.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)subsidize the living expenses of low-wage workers.
If Walmart was forced to pay a living wage (i.e., pay it's workforce enough that it Walmart workers wouldn't qualify for government assistance like WIC, food stamps, Earned Income Tax Credit, etc.) then it wouldn't be profitable.
So the answer is NO! The 1%ers have everything set up exactly like they want it.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Pretty damn close.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But this one is arguably the worst system we have. I don't see how it is justice to lock so many people up for non-violent crimes, deny their right to vote once they served their time and set them up to fail again. It is insanity. I wish that was the only kind of slavery in this country at least it is somewhat avoidable. Avoid debt, not so much.
begin_within
(21,551 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Slaves have to be fed, housed, and given medical care.
valerief
(53,235 posts)21st century slavery.
And that's just what they're doing in this country.
EC
(12,287 posts)what would stop them here? Conscience?
Johonny
(20,851 posts)all the benefits of slavery, none of the costs.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)and then debt-cropping after that. As Ralph Ellison said in Invisible Man: Keep them running.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)When the goal of business is profit, then there can be no morality involved. So it's just business to reduce pay to subsistence levels.
It's the governments responsibility to control businesses. However, when we allow businesses to own the government, the gulf between the haves and have-nots will continue to widen until the peons rebel.
Machiavelli would warn the capitalists not to take so much that it leaves the peons with nothing to lose. Those with nothing to lose will rebel. But greed is like crack to the capitalists. They will kill the goose.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Combined with high unemployment and even homelessness for students still studying.
Ter
(4,281 posts)But never one so bad that they support slavery. Even David Duke doesn't.
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)are any indication. Just do it out of sight and pretend it is not happening, that is the 21st century way.
underoath
(269 posts)OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...all minorities and political opponents would be fair game for those folks.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Working for the man these days has you chained to him in so many ways.