General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is it some men get all offended if a woman they don't know is wary around them?
Just a few minutes ago, I was standing at the bus stop, and some guy said "hi" as he walked by. I said "hi" in return; but instead of just going on his way, he stopped and said, Are you staying out of trouble?" I just gave him a look I seem to have inherited from my mother, and he got all huffy before he went on down the street. BTW, my mother also taught me not to talk to strange men. Every mother worth her salt teaches her daughters that. Why should I be obliged to drop my guard just to avoid offending some guy I never saw before, and won't see again? I don't see any reason myself.
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)What kind of question is that to ask a stranger anyway? I don't blame you.
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)Over the years.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)who gets into trouble (hence the half-joke are you staying out of trouble you bad girl?) -- and somebody thinks a stranger will respond in a positive way to this? I've heard it before and I just look away and ignore at that point. Move away if necessary. Look at cell phone, talk to friends, etc. None of the nice guys I know/have known ever use a line like that one.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)heck, I've never said it to anyone, that I can remember.
"put it in the wind,pal" would have been a fine response...
treestar
(82,383 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)We are Devo
(193 posts)Very odd. I would have glared too, or just looked away. Who cares if the guy gets huffy, that's his problem!
MADem
(135,425 posts)If a lady says yes, then there's an opening to offer to show the woman what she's missing.
If she says no, then the fellow might ask if he can join in.
The hard look is what I'd want the young ladies in my family to perfect!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Butterbean
(1,014 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)I don't blame you either. Creepy.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)But seriously, it's hard for me to say since I never start conversations with women I don't know. I have had occasions where I'm walking, and there is a woman walking in front of me, and she notices I'm behind her and does something like hold her bags tighter, or walks faster, etc, and it makes me feel bad. I want to say "don't worry, I'm not dangerous and I don't want you to feel afraid" but of course I worry that would make me sound like a psycho
Skittles
(153,164 posts)believe me, by not saying anything the gal probably figures you're no psycho - problem is, we can never be too careful. It sucks how much of our behavior is based on the fact that some people on this earth do not know how to behave
I figure I'll sometimes be thought a psycho no matter what, but I'm less likely to if I just keep my mouth shut. Then everyone is happy!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)her get a lead, she will feel more comfortable and words are not necessary.
but.... i like and appreciate you think about that.
and i am sorry fear of strangers for some women and girls make you feel bad. that sucks, too.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Sometimes the best course has been to speed up and pass her instead.
Yeah, it sucks to be the cause that cautious reaction, but it sucks even more to have to have the reaction in the first place, thus I don't complain about it
drmeow
(5,018 posts)"Is he speeding up to grab me?"
It is OK to do but try to really give her a wide berth as you speed up and pass. If someone is behind me and they start speeding up, I'll move as far as I can to one side of the sidewalk (which I've probably already done when I heard them behind me). If he then moves to the other side, I feel MUCH better.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)male or female.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)and she hears footsteps behind her, nervously turns around to see who it is, and visibly relaxes when she sees it's another woman. I've done the same.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Foolacious
(497 posts)I'll turn and go another way, or stop completely and pretend to attend to something so that she gets far ahead, or I'll walk faster and way out around her so that I'm no longer following her -- she's following me -- and I'll keep up the pace to put more distance between us. If I have to pass close by I'll do it very quickly and without comment except maybe for "Pardon me."
Iggo
(47,555 posts)To paraphrase a rebuke from yesterday, "That's no way to talk to a lady."
Raine
(30,540 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Does that help?
mythology
(9,527 posts)but at the same time a store being robbed, while a bad thing, isn't as personally violating as rape. But on the other, other hand, the majority of rapes, like most crimes, are committed by someone known to the victim.
Granted the incident in the original post is a little odd. But I try to avoid small talk with strangers and even when I've been in a position where I have to go up to a stranger, particularly at night, I do my best to find at least two people and come up to them slowly from the front because I'm aware that I'm sometimes seen by others as imposing.
JI7
(89,250 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)However, the OP asked "Why is it some men get all offended if a woman they don't know is wary around them?" and I provided what I think is a reasonable answer, that maybe some men dislike being prejudged.
GObamaGO
(665 posts)is NOT an opening for him to invade her space. And her making clear with body language that she was not engaging was not an opening for him to get hostile. Sorry.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 10, 2012, 02:09 PM - Edit history (1)
Rejected, which he disliked. Some men are used to getting shown deference by women, their mothers, sisters, co-workers, etc. If they aren't, they get angry enough that they retaliate verbally or otherwise. That is a form of entitlement, or just a continuation of a life pattern that gives comfort and one is unwilling to let go. Many of those patterns can be positives with respect shown.
Most women read subtle clues from facial and body expression, tone of voice, eye contact as well as words being said, as part of their learned vigilance to prevent assault. This guy asked her a loaded question that denoted a sense of unearned familiarity. Several people have done a good job of describing how that conversation could have gone wrong.
Some guys don't want to hear 'no' in any respect about what they want. Any woman who has had experience with a man who doesn't respect boundaries will refuse to give an opening to conversation, period. It's her right to do so.
I'm not chiding you, as we're communicating our life experiences and these may not be yours.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Being followed around by some strange man is kind of like being trailed by a salesperson. Public policing of strangers by patronizing creeps.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Only that some guy at a bus stop tried to initiate a conversation that she quickly shut down with some sort of unpleasant look. Then she felt compelled to come here to DU and ask why some men are offended when treated like incipient rapists on no evidence. I think the analogy between "All men are rapists' and "all blacks are shoplifters" is valid.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Creepy. And the OP didn't say "All men are rapists." Nice straw. I think the analogy is "Why are all men potential 'shopkeepers' who follow women around asking inappropriate questions?" WTF kind of question is "Are you staying out of trouble?".
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Come on. Is "Are you staying out of trouble" really that different from "How's it going"? I've had both said to me and they came across about the same. So again we're back to this guy not following anyone around and in fact leaving once rebuffed. But that's not really the point. The OP asked "Why is it some men get all offended if a woman they don't know is wary around them?" and I still contend that it could possibly be because they resent being treated as an incipient rapist, much as a black person might resent being followed around a store because they're considered an incipient shoplifter.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)The OP then came on DU and asked, "Why is it some men get all offended if a woman they don't know is wary around them?". I answered that perhaps some men disliked being treated as incipient rapists for no reason. I gave as an example that a black person might feel offended if followed around a store because they might be an incipient shoplifter. I'm still not seeing the difference, and frankly you're not convincing me I should. You can have the last word but I'm done with sub-thread.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)The woman is the one who is treated as an incipient blowjob--as many women, including myself, have been ordered to perform, after the "friendly" unasked-for contact at bus stops. I'm assuming this isn't a response you get much at bus stops yourself.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)This is how people MEET! One person initiates contact. If said contact is rebuffed, the initiator moves on. That is what happened in this case. He didn't respond with nasty remarks or name-calling, he moved on.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)after he "initiated contact" and I said "hi" back. But, that's how people MEET! Oh, silly me.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)People are assholes. That is a given. In THIS case, what is supposed to happen happened.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Do you know how many cases there are every year of women being sexually assaulted at bus stops by strangers? A savvy male who wishes to seek friendly contact should probably seek other venues than strangers at bus stops.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sexual+assault+bus+stop&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US fficial&client=firefox-a
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)We should be happy.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Getting agitated over what COULD have happened is pointless.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)My is informed by my life experiences, as is yours. I don't tell you how to feel...so, some reciprocation would be nice.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Nor have I said you cannot have your own opinion.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Be happy yourself if you want to. You got all up in this subthread to convince me of...something.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)would happen.Any man with an ounce of respect for women would be understanding if we are not too comfortable with men we do not know. Geez, at least acknowledge that rape is a very real threat to women and it is understandable that we would be wary. If you get offended by that, that's your problem, not the woman's problem.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But we do know what the most likely outcome will be, and in this case, the most likely outcome actually did take place.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)We ARE targets of violent crimes an awful lot. If we just go about life all happy go lucky and are not in the habit of looking out for ourselves, it would be a recipe for disaster. I speak from experience on that. I have learned a lot through the years. There are plenty of gentlemen in the world who can take a no and still be non-creepy and non-hateful about it.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Most women clearly signal with their body language whether they are open to being approached or not. Men need only see whether these women meet their eyes, nod, or smile back at them, before they even open their mouths. If a woman is reading, listening to music, is looking out the window, is turned away slightly = don't bother her. It's as simple as that.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)People are people and often do lot act jut like we wish they would. In THIS case, what should have happened happened.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Some men need to get a clue. It isn't rocket science.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)When he was rebuffed, he moved on.
It isn't rocket science.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)The clue the guy in the OP did NOT get was "Don't go away mad. Just go away." You are singing the guy's praises as if he wasn't disrespectful when he left. He was. Don't gloss that over.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)The OP was very ambiguous about what really happened. "Left in a huff" means two things, jack and shit.
The point? YOU are "in a huff" over something you know nothing about.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Apparently Mr. Left-in-a-huff did. Why was he huffy? Oh right, because he was rebuffed. The nerve of her.
Darth_Kitten
(14,192 posts)He got his "response", couldn't handle her "response" and got his knickers in a knot.
What part of a woman just minding her own business and not looking for attention do some people just not understand?
The onus is not on HER. She doesn't have to do anything!
Poor guy, all those uptight gals with their agendas making human interaction so hard.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You have no idea at all about how this person reacted. The OP says he left "in a huff". What the fuck does that even mean? You expand that with "knickers in a knot", like you were there and had a first hand account. You have no idea what took place and are agitated enough about the fantasy encounter you have created in your mind that you want to chastise me for not agreeing with your interpretation of one persons account of on event that overall seems very benign.
Save the outrage for reality. There is enough actually going on in the world where your outrage may actually do something constructive.
You have a nice day.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)by other guys. I can understand the point of the OP to some degree, but I also understand that it is also a "how's it going" kind of remark.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)And assume that I find you attractive just because you find ME attractive by saying "How you doing", lurking all around me, keep pressing when rebuff you then -
You have two problems. You assume that you can get in my personal space. Problem one. You also assume that since you find me attractive, I find you attractive. Problem two.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)none of which were in my post, but you are on a roll...............
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Is loaded with sexual connotations, presumptions and attemt to dominant and control. To ask that, one is implying that the woman has been "in trouble" before. He was also strongly implying that it was his job to manage the woman's behavior, which smacks of paternalism, and that her past behavior is immediately under suspicion. Guy is a first class misogynist. So the woman was totally correct to be offended as he engaged in pre-judging her first. "Are you staying out of trouble?" when directed by a stranger at anyone is a question loaded with pre-value judgements and definitely an attempt to dominate by lowering the character level of the other person to ones moral and ethical inferior. It is pure psychological abuse.The guy is a piece of living shit.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Is Romulox a reference to the Star Trek civilization The Romulans?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Says remote linking is forbidden for that image.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)(romulox on right)
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Now I've seen everything. Who would even think to draw that??? Lmao.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)It's from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Back when it used to be a good show.
http://video.adultswim.com/aqua-teen-hunger-force/bruce-willis.html
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Almost always from either a stranger or a person I don't know on a personal basis. The only time I hear the expression from familiar folk is usually elder to youth like an uncle or grandparent to a younger relative they haven't seen in a bit that has grown up.
It has been asked by women and men. In fact, the last person to ask was a friendly woman working the register and a little country store a couple days ago as I bought a cup of coffee and a bag of ice.
It is just something that some folks say as a conversation starter/idle chit chat.
En, being human beings (or even just mammals) take offense to being regarded as a threat. See how a dog responds to such, they get an attitude too.
Women do sadly need to be wary but the outward expression of such can cause a reaction from any social animal.
It insulting to be treated as a predator and as such a little balance in how one deals with people is also reasonable as a womans caution.
People smile and greet babies and children, they are affable with strangers, men are interested in women and hope to stop being strangers.
Were supposed to talk to each other and as a practical matter the balance is off, people are far too trusting of family and known associations and overly wary of strangers. It those we know that are most likely to act as predators.
I just think this little deal is overblown with more reading in and prejudice than is justified in the telling here but then it is easy for me to say, I have no feeling of being likely to be a victim, just that me waving to your baby is no reason to run for the hills and despising the apparent accusation, that is a dehumanizing position to take be out driven by caution or not.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I'll bet no man on this thread has heard "Your lips would feel like cherry pie on my cock" either...another line I encountered from someone I said hi to at a bus stop.
Tien1985
(920 posts)When I was younger and trying to wrap my head around this kind of thing, my mom explained it this way:
If you walked around the block today and three guys in red hats jumped out and hit you over the head, you might not think much of it. But if everyday you or someone you knew were accosted by people in red hats, YOU would be pretty thick not to start avoiding people wearing them.
1 in 3 girls and women. 1 in 3 is assaulted. Yes, being prejudged is not fun. But sometimes you have to suck it up and understand that you are unintentionally part of a group that has caused and continues to cause a massive amount of damage. Being aware of privilege tends to dull anger and annoyance at people who don't enjoy the same privileges. Being able to walk around without fear of rape or harassment is a privilege that guys have that women don't.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Red hat, black skin, male genitalia, it's all the same. You're prejudging people based on a shared trait and its wrong.
Tien1985
(920 posts)If you want to ignore a 1 out of 3 statistic you can. I won't and I don't hold it against others if they do too.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)tblue37
(65,377 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)or they really are.
there was a list of how to prevent rape and instead of what women do, it was what men need to do. not rape.
i had my two teenage boys read it. my youngest giggled. my oldest, though he got it told me he was bothered, because it was like all men are rapist.
i told him the difference from all men are rapist to women do not KNOW if a man is or is not, so are cautious.
he got it. seeing from that point he did not take it personally. i think it is a very real reaction to offense, but, i think most men can understand the reality, then though it is sad, it is not personal.
Tien1985
(920 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Only courts judge innocence and guilt. Individuals may merely practice prudent behavior in public... regardless of whether someone else feels offended by that benign prudence.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Like crossing the street if one sees an African American, for example?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)One prejudice is considered repulsive, the other is merely "benign prudence".
But what is the difference? Explain to me like I'm one of your boys!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i understand what you are doing.
if you cannot or will not answer the question honestly, i think that is a pretty damn good reply to your analogy.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)but you are not saying it out loud. i dont get that.
anyway
in laws are coming into town. two days of cleaning and i have the two rooms left.
have a good day.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)As usual, I didn't say ANY PART of the sentiment you are trying to put in my mouth!
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)with strangers initiating contact and saying something inappropriate or creepy or just plain harassing.
Most people who cross the street when they see an African-American man are just reacting to stories they've been, things they see on TV, etc. -- anything but actual experience.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Racism requires no foundation, no basis for the behavior, just a belief that others are inferior.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)So therefore, I have a green light to discriminate? And better still, because of this "foundation", such discrimination will be "not racist" by definition?
I don't see the logic here...
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)you do have the right to exercise more caution when you see others who have those attributes. That's discrimination* not racism. If you refuse to hire people with those attributes, or try to pass laws that make it illegal for people with those attributes to move about as freely you, that's racism.
*discrimination, with a small d, is something we all do, every day. Most of us work hard to avoid discrimination that is more like civil rights violations, the kind of wholesale discrimination that leads to racism, sexism, etc.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)...
The other point I want to make here, which goes back to my objection to anti-black racism being used as a rhetorical device by those who will never face it, is that black people engage in tons of behaviours to make white people feel safer. We do this all the damn time. We make accommodations in speech, behaviour, dress, mannerism, conversation topic a wide diversity of adjustments that we make in the presence of our white friends. We want them to feel comfortable around us, and we accept the inherent racism of the need for such changes. The fact that you rail against its manifest unfairness is indicative of the fact that you have no idea were doing it which means, in turn, that were doing it well. Until I am convinced that you actually understand anti-black racism (which would take quite a bit of doing), I dont appreciate being deputized into your anti-feminist screed in this way.
Anyway, this is obviously simply my opinion and personal experience. I personally dont have a problem with the argument, and I have done my best to illustrate why I think that Schroedingers Rapist, while unfortunate, is not unfair. If you disagree, I hope you will explain why in the comments.
TL/DR: Ive frequently heard people object to the Schroedingers Rapist argument as sexist, with anti-black racism used as a counter-example. I reject this comparison because it neglects two important factors: 1) that the issue under discussion is about whether or not we want women to feel more comfortable; and 2) that black people often make similar behavioural adjustments to accommodate the racism of their white friends. I share some personal stories to illustrate this.
Update: Comrade Physioprof has made this excellent observation: It is not sexist for women to view all men as potential rapists, because (other than in prison) men possess the privilege of being subject to a vanishingly small likelihood of being raped by either men or women, while women are subject to a substantial likelihood of being raped by men. In contrast, it is racist for white people to view all black people as potential criminals, because (as far as I can discern from available crime statistics) white people are the ones who possess the privilege of being less likely to be crime victims than black people, and they are more likely to be victims of crimes committed by white people than by black people.
...
Romulox
(25,960 posts)The most substantial likelihood is of a woman being harmed (whether physical, emotional, or sexual assault) by an intimate partner or family member.
So the statistics actually suggest that this fear of strangers is anything but rational.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)You can think it's irrational if you like.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Could you provide the numbers?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)However irrational you personally feel it to be, women are aware of these issues and adjust their behavior (or not) however they think best serves their own needs. That is their right.
Response to redqueen (Reply #310)
Post removed
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)As a percentage of the total. So we have a threshold for what we can consider worrying.
Also women =/= children. Last I checked children could be male or female. So including women and children together doesn't make any sense and is a deliberate attempt to inflate the numbers.
So just give me the totals for women disappearing each year please.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)If that offends you, tough shit. We have to look out for ourselves, or hear the same tired old, "she was asking for it" meme if we do get raped. By your logic, we should trust every stranger we meet and become a doormat. That shit ain't happening.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)275. Your logic would get a woman raped. Period.
The logic in question was in not judging (and presumably acting) differently around men than women.
Right?
GObamaGO
(665 posts)It really is exhausting at times needing to be hypervigilant about personal safety.
Edited to add: Welcome to DU!!
Tien1985
(920 posts)niyad
(113,318 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You go into a store, you expect to be treated as a customer. Respected, and trusted at least as much as any other customer in that store.
On the other hand, a person minding their own business does not expect to be browsed, as if they were an item at a store.
The context damn sure matters.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)The original question was, to paraphrase, why do some men get offended when stranger women act wary around them. My position is that it's for the same reason a black person might be offended if they were being followed around a store. Do you really not see that being treated suspiciously when you're doing nothing wrong might be a bit annoying?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The function of a store is to sell shit to customers. There is the expectation that if you open a store, people will come in and browse. Your owning a store is invitation for people to do exactly that. if you then go out of your way to treat one set of customers differently from another set, the former has a valid place to complain about your behavior.
On the other hand, most people - women included - aren't "open for business." They don't want random people to "stop in and browse." it bugs people. If you stop and pester someone uninvited - "Hey, are you keeping out of trouble?" - you have no fucking place to complain if their hackles go up. You are intruding. On the face of it, maybe there's nothing wrong with that, you're a friendly person trying to strike up a conversation, fine. But if the person stiffens up and sends "go away" signals, go away. You do not have a right to their time, they do not desire your presence, and it doesn't hurt you to take a hint and leave them alone.
And no, it's not just men who seem to think it's their god-given right to intrude like this. But it seems to usually be men who get upset with the "go away" reaction.
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #154)
Jamastiene This message was self-deleted by its author.
spooky3
(34,456 posts)In this case, the man violated the social norms against approaching strangers. He is the one taking the risk that someone will react negatively to him, especially if he goes beyond simply saying hello. He has no right to get "in a huff" or in any way get upset when it is his own behavior, not his simply being male and saying nothing, that has put him at risk.
By the way, had the OP been a man rather than a woman, I doubt very much that the incident would have occurred. The man in the OP's incident was clearly not motivated by simply wanting to be friendly. None of my male friends has ever described another man's hoping to strike up a friendship at a bus stop in this way. They probably would presume that the approacher was either mistaking them for a gay man, or that he was about to rob them, or that he was unbalanced. And that is without the experiences that women have of having much higher risks of stranger assault than do men. If you were honest with yourself and with us, your reactions would not be what you are describing.
renie408
(9,854 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)reading a book. If he says hello I'd say hello then put myself back to reading. If he says something then I'd pretend I didn't hear him and keep on reading.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)If she was interested then she talked to me.
My wife talked to me first.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)tblue37
(65,377 posts)to know what I am reading. Yes, "demand" is the right word. They insist that I tell them what the book is. If I say the title, out of politeness or just to try to get them to leave me alone, they then ask, "Is it any good?" or "What's it about?"
After that happened a handful of times (when I was still young and hadn't worked out a system--and did not yet realize that until I really shut them down, they were going to continue to pester me), I no longer bothered trying to be polite in responding to the first question.
When approached with "What are you reading," I would simply respond (curtly): "Book."
If they asked the follow-up question, I would look daggers and say quite firmly, "Am I bothering you?" (I have a very good daggers look and an effective firm voice.) Usually the man would back off then, but never without muttering unpleasantly at me for not being "nice." And sometimes their verbal response would go beyond mere muttering.
The point is that they had no interest in knowing what I was reading. They were trying to chat me up. I did not want to be chatted up, but apparently my wishes were entirely irrelevant. I had no right not to be chatted up by any random male stranger who found me attractive enough to be worth a go.
The poster who keeps insisting that women are being unfair to assume the worst of all those innocent friendly guys who should be assumed innocent until proven guilty is obviously unaware that a woman in public has a right not to be chatted up by random male strangers if she does not wish to be.
Even when I felt safe enough (and by the way, we often do not feel all that safe when approached, because many men convey such a sense of entitlement that it comes across as demanding and aggressive), I was still being intruded upon by someone who obviously felt no qualms at all about demanding that I pay attention to him and at least flirt with him (because that was precisely what the whole point of his intended interaction was).
Hey, fella--Who the frack has a right to demand that I flirt with him? Don't pretend you don't know that is what such men are doing!
And if the woman even says a polite but uninviting "Hi" back, they take it as an invitation, so if she continues the exchange--as some women do because, even though they do not wish to, they do not feel they have a right to refuse to submit to such demands on their "niceness"--then these men assume they have a right to demand your phone number, or to demand a date, or even to follow you the frack home!
There is no point in these exchanges at which a woman is permitted to end the exchange, up to and including the demand for her number, for a date, or for the right to actually follow her to her destination. No matter when she wants the exchange to stop, she will be in the wrong, according to such men, because she will not be being nice. She will be, oh, so unfairly assuming this innocent, friendly man is an incipient rapist.
Whether she refuses to return the first "Hi" or the first answer to the "innocent" question ("What are you reading?" , or tries to end the exchange at the next question, the next one, or the nextand remember, these "questions" soon turn into outright requests and/or demands for much more than just talk, though being forced to chat with a stranger you do not want to chat with is upsetting enough! no matter where she tries to close down the interaction, the man will become annoyed at the very least, but usually much more than annoyed.
We are lucky if all we get are dirty looks or sotto voce mutterings. Usually we get outrage, insults, even raised voices and threats.
Any man who will invade a woman's personal space without invitation and then persist in doing so when she signals that his attentions are unwelcome is a potential rapist, because he is already demonstrating that he does not take no for an answer and that he does not think the woman has any right whatsoever to her own personal space, to her own privacy, to her own autonomy, or to anything else that he does not want to cede to her.
There is a very short distance from that attitude to the decision to take whatever else he wants from her, whether or not she wishes to give it up, as long as he thinks he can get away with it.
The many men who are not potential rapists do not have that attitude toward women. They recognize that the woman has a right to decide whom she will talk to, and that when she doesn't want to talk to a strange man, she has a right to make that decision, too, without being glared at, muttered at, yelled at, or otherwise subjected to threatening words, vocal tones, gestures, or body language.
On edit: I am 62 years old now, and though I would prefer to be young and healthy, I must admit I was very glad when I was no longer young enough and pretty enough to be the target of unwanted attention from strange men!
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I wish I could rec this post, tblue37. Everything you say is spot on. Now we can only hope that certain men can rempvetheir entitlement glasses long enough to read it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)away from you and make sure you say it loud enough so people around you can hear it and he will be so embrassed he will leave you alone.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I had a man physically grab my chest once in a public park. The really bad thing about it was I was with friends, but got separated from them temporarily when it happened. The really good thing was that they were in earshot of me. I said loudly, "Get your hands off of me!" and my friends were there in a heartbeat. He finally backed off me. Before I learned how to handle myself in life, I was the woman who was constantly prey for the types who will take politeness and turn it into a chance to overtake a woman who was not interested. I have since learned to either not make any eye contact, ignore them if they speak at all, or just be rude if I have to. If they are offended, that's their problem. There is a right way and a wrong way to treat a woman. Not all women are going to remain shy, demure prey objects all of our lives. We eventually learn to deal with the reality of the world we live in. It ain't pretty but a woman's got to do what a woman's got to do. The really cool part is that a man with even an iota of respect for women, would at least empathize and not get offended. The rest show themselves for the misogynists that they are, by getting offended that they stepped over the line and we backed them off of us. Their mentality is what gives them away. It is not what a man says. It is how he says it and how he acts that makes us uncomfortable around some men.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)when I was about 17 yrs old and my sister, my Italian cousin were just walking minding our own buisness in beautiful Naples by the oceans within the city and some guy came up behind us and pinched my sister on her butt. Needless to say I had my purse and I wacked him and he ran off. This happened on a busy street. What I hate even more are the cat calls. Sometimes I felt like they are undressing you with all those cat calls. To me it's disgusting but worse you would think some of those guys have daughters. But they don't care.
niyad
(113,318 posts)widely.
tblue37
(65,377 posts)Or should I put it in a dedicated group?
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)And thank you; I, too, appreciated your comment.
niyad
(113,318 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Nothing more to add.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)kiranon
(1,727 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)aletier_v
(1,773 posts)or video camera is present during a date, just in case she claims I tried to rape her.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)DiverDave
(4,886 posts)I read that...lol
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Best.Comeback.Ever.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Kennah
(14,270 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe you need a few steps before launching into the whole "dating" thing...?
renie408
(9,854 posts)you have got to develop some kind of mental self-editing capability.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)Would have loved to have seen the look you gave the creep!
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Mine is but a pale imitation. Maybe that's because I never had kids to practice it on, and it doesn't work on cats.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What the hell kind of question is that? I'm glad you pissed him off.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Because
{Yes ... I'm being sarcastic!}
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Kennah
(14,270 posts)... but I think that's a pretty spot-on assessment of this guy's reaction to the OP.
veganlush
(2,049 posts)You never what evil mayl lurk. on the other hand, he may have mistook you for an acquaintance, but either way you can't worry about offending and any man with a brain knows that women need to play it safe under those circumstances. As a large and scary looking man, I avoid putting women on the spot like that.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It's nice to see a man who has enough respect for women to empathize enough to be respectful toward us.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)She and another woman went out walking and two guys tried to hit on them on the street. At one point, one of the guys asked her, "are you nervous?"
It was at that point that she realized she'd gone into a karate defense stance - instinctively. She's a 2nd degree black belt. It was one of those "hair on the back of your neck" things. The guys left them alone. She's got a guy back home (who lives in our house now) and wasn't interested in getting picked up.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I see them all the time. Their being insulted is them blaming you for their rudeness. It is sort of blame the victim.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but I recall a back and forth where you claimed not to know any male a-holes. (We were talking about rape.)
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)being attacked. I should have listened to myself and will in the future.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I went back and researched it ... I confused you with another DUer.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)to sometimes resort to yelling GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME.
works like a charm
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 10, 2012, 05:14 PM - Edit history (1)
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)I don't mean to imply that you're unfriendly, and certainly there's lots of support for your reaction in this thread, but I *usually* don't think twice about being friendly with strangers, men and women alike. I say usually because I don't always want to be casually friendly with everyone I encounter, and some people telegraph having their barriers up so they deserve respect, but maybe it's just the nature of my part of the north coast-- people are generally pretty friendly. Case in point-- I was at the hardware store this weekend, and in the span of fifteen minutes I had a brief conversation with a woman about a can of paint she was looking at ("Hey I painted my utility trailer with that stuff a year ago and now I'm constantly touching it up, not very durable." , then shared a joke with another lady as I was leaving (the automatic door didn't work so she had to shove it open, "Oops, you broke it!" .
People say "Hi!" to one another here, they ask how you're doing. I probably talk to ten strangers a day on street corners and parking lots (admittedly, half are students at the university where it's not hard to guess that I'm a prof, but the other half are just around town).
JI7
(89,250 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I've had several hardware type conversations in hardware stores with strange men that weren't scary at all. I think what the guy said was creepy. Maybe he was drunk. I used to be a bartender and I heard guys say some really strange stuff to girls when they were drunk. Then they would be in the bar the next day crying to me why they keep striking out. I told them because they get drunk to get their courage up and then what comes out of their mouth is totally inappropriate.
clydefrand
(4,325 posts)I smile and talk with people or say "hi, how are you?" I love seeing people with their babies. I smile at them and might say something. The child has always smiled back. I love that.
I wish we all could do that because we would have a much happier country. Years and years ago, people did do that.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)Tien1985
(920 posts)People are really friendly here, and even the phrase "Staying out of trouble?" is common--even to people you don't know, especially an older person to a younger one. It's suppose to be a joke. On the other hand, people being as friendly as they are, I haven't known anyone to get huffy if someone else fails to respond or looks to be to busy or wary to answer. That is the part of this that is odd to me. I might try to start a conversation with someone nearby, but I don't get myself in a tizzy if they don't answer me, and I certainly don't walk away in a huff.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)That suggests an entitlement of some sort, that people should always want to converse with the person.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)me to stop what I'm doing and have a conversation with them. Like, me in tears crying.
JI7
(89,250 posts)i should have reported this one time where one of those private security types started asking me questions and following me around.
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)is so much read into this than it might actually be (by posters here)? We women have to be wary; there's too many screwballs out there.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)touching my neck, and then looked offended that *I* was offended by him touching me.
Screw that. If a man gets offended because you don't fawn all over him, he's up to no good anyway. A gentleman (and a gentlewoman, for that matter) doesn't get in your business, ask personal questions if they don't know you, or otherwise harass you.
You were harassed.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)That was even creepier.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Men that assume you owe them some deference, some amount of bliss that they notice you.
Uh, no.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I'm a guy ... and I recently had to touch a woman at the grocery store.
She had dropped a pair of very nice sun glasses as she was leaving the store ... I picked them up (I was going in), and was saying to her, "excuse me ... Miss ... excuse me ... " ...
...But she did not hear me ... or ... she was terrified that some big weird guy was following her and so she was trying to ignore me.
And so when she got to her car, I tapped her as lightly as I could on he shoulder. After doing that, I tried to stand back at a "safe distance" ...
She turned and looked at me with a look that said, "I don't want to talk to you" ... not angry, not scared ... just "go away" ...
And then I held out her sun glasses ... and said "I saw you drop these."
Her defenses came down ... some. I stayed back, gave her the glasses, she thanked me, I said NP ... and then turned and went back towards the store.
I was not offended that she seemed uncomfortable when I called to her initially. Guys should see that as a woman's natural reaction.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)SUNGLASSES!"
No touching. NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)In the future, if something like that ever happens to you again, please do NOT go and tap the woman on the shoulder. Yell something like "Miss, you dropped your sunglasses!"
If I had been in that woman's shoes, I would have jumped out of my damned skin when you tapped me on my shoulder after sending out my "go away" vibe, but was still being followed by a stranger.
spooky3
(34,456 posts)tell her about the sunglasses?
Never, never, never touch a stranger unless it is to pull them out of danger as they step in front of an oncoming car.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)if you were in a safe area. Most women don't like to be touched ANYWHERE by strange men without initiating, though.
I know I certainly don't. Other men (and the girlfriends, mothers, brothers, sisters, etc. of women) don't like women being pawed at, either. I was ready to deck someone that was getting to close for comfort to my mother.
Women don't like overly aggressive males, and neither does anyone else. (not implying you did this - you were just being nice).
Overall too many men try to be overly aggressive with women, and it doesn't just make the victim mad, it makes the person that is with them mad, too.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The situation I described was in the grocery store parking lot, mid-day, other people in the parking lot.
And I agree completely on the "no touching" ... that was the last think I wanted to do ... a few others have attacked me above saying maybe I should have shouted at her. Maybe that would have been better.
At the time, I was trying to get her attention in the least threatening manner I could. So while I was trying to be loud enough to be heard (and I do think she could hear me), I also know that I did not want my tone to seem threatening in any way.
Its sad that there are guys who've created an environment in which women, for very legitimate safety reasons, have to start-out feeling threatened in such situations. The guys who don't know women feel threatened in such situations are probably the same ones who would get upset when a woman appears to feel threatened. I wasn't upset with the woman for feeling threatened, I knew it was happening. So I was just trying to minimize the perceived threat level I knew I would generate in trying to return her sunglasses.
A funny note within this serious topic ... the sun glasses that the woman dropped, looked expensive to me. I'm not an expert, but back around 1997, my wife got me to buy a really nice pair of Rayband sunglasses for over $100. I didn't want to buy them. I said that was way too much for sun glasses because I always would lose or break them. But she said, "if you spend that much for sunglasses, you'll take care of them". So I bought them. She was right (she usually is). And I still have them and wear them all the time. So when I picked up the woman's sunglasses, and saw that they looked expensive ... it kind of created a sense of urgency. Having had them for close to 15 years, I'd be miserable if I lost my raybands.
spooky3
(34,456 posts)that you KNOW is concerned about you (as you said in your post).
You're lucky she didn't turn a weapon on you or that she was not a martial arts expert who might have reacted quickly to your touching her in a way you might have found very painful.
No one is "attacking" you - they are trying to explain what you should have done instead, for your own safety as well as that of others.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)to know when a woman is unnerved by them. The respectful ones don't walk away in a huff. That much is for sure.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Being that forward with someone you don't know in a public setting that in no way invites it is . . . weird.
I get that some people are more extroverted than I am but that would seem to take it to another level.
And I don't think this is a man versus woman thing. I think this is a capable of minding one's own business versus not being capable of minding one's own business thing.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)It was at the commuter train station, very early in the morning. A young lady was sitting on a bench reading a book as I arrived.
What a beautiful sunrise this morning - I said.
She looked up from her book and said - Oh, I missed it.
No, you didn't; It's behind you - I said, as I pulled my camera to take some pictures.
She got up and came around the divider that was blocking her view. Sure enough, the sky was on fire. The sun was hitting an overcast sky from below, lighting the clouds up. Crimson reds, pumpkin oranges and golden yellows, framed by solemn grays and a cobalt blue sky behind. I took my shots, grabbed a newspaper, smiled at her and moved down the tramway to another bench to read. She stayed behind watching the sunrise.
A few minutes later the train arrived and as we were boarding she said to me - thank you for letting me know about the sunrise. We exchanged smiles again, and went our separate ways.
The end.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Unassuming. Notice that word.
You didn't assume she would do something, or react. It just happened. What happens with a lot of people is that they *assume* that their attention, presence or forceful opinion is warranted.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Thanks.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)babylonsister
(171,066 posts)I did something very simple at work early this morning. A lone woman was walking down the aisle. She had a look of impassivity on her face. I looked at her, smiled, and chirped 'Good Morning'. Her face lit up and she replied likewise. It's the human connection that can make such a difference. Her reaction made me feel good.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)It's all about connecting.
It's all about letting people around you know, that you're happy to see them, happy to know them, happy to share this planet with them.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)the OP talks about.
it is intention and i think we can feel the difference.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)And we can sense the need for more personal space.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)then it happened to me.....
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Here is one of the pictures I took that day.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)that I do know.
For instance, I know a woman at work who gives people hugs. She's really nice. We had not seen each other in a while and we ran into each other with a larger group of others. She was hugging various people, she was going to hug me, I stayed back. She had told me in confidence (a year or so prior) that some women at work thought she used her attractiveness to get ahead, and that she hated it. It doesn't help that she divorced her husband and married the guy she was cheating with. We are friends, and I would have hugged her, but I immediately worried about the message it would send to others.
I was working with another woman at work, she was new to our area, and so she was doing an objective review of some of what the team produced as if she was one of our customers. As she and I were discussing her impressions, she said, "I enjoyed doing this, after all, you're only a virgin once!" ... meaning that she'd only be new to the material for a brief time ... but the phrase she used ... what should I, as a man, say to her? If I had said to her, at the start ... "thanks for doing this review ... after all, you're only a virgin once!" I'd have probably ended up in front of review board and reprimanded for my insensitivity.
I tell these stories because, if I was that guy, I'd have been aware that the things I said to a woman I don't know, could be taken in a way I did not intend. And so, I'd be very cautious. As a guy, you don't just jump from "hi" to "are you staying out of trouble?" with a woman you don't know.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You don't jump from Hi to "are you staying out of trouble", but unfortunately, you've encountered some women that were questionable .
You are doing the right thing. Navigate around women that throw out weird things, and be a gentleman, and there will be gentlewomen that respond. They won't have to throw themselves at you or throw out questionable statements.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And we talked about work, projects, some family stuff, so on ...
Around the 16th hole, he said ... "I notice you don't talk about how attractive the women we work with are." He told me how many of our peers spent lots of time talking about the "hot women".
He and I worked in a development and marketing group, and being attractive was part of the job description for those in marketing ... especially for the women (old grey hair guys appear to have "experience" ... but I digress).
I said ... (paraphrased) "Well, we do work with lots of attractive women, but for me to be successful, I need to make sure that the marketing team, male or female, knows the product details and can explain them. And I'm very happily married, so while I might find some of our female colleagues attractive, that's not an area of focus for me, professionally or personally".
As an aside ... the woman who made the "only a virgin once" comment that I mentioned ... I actually think she was comfortable saying that to me because she did not see me as a workplace threat. If she did see me a a threat, she'd never say that. I actually think she was displaying a level of comfort making an off-color joke in front of me, that I would have never been comfortable making in front of her. But at the time, it scared the crap out of me. Might she claim I said it??? No one else heard it. Ahhhhhh.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)A big smile and a "hello" is more than enough to illicit either an invitation to chat or a clear 'do not talk to me' facial expression or body language in response. If you ignore the 'do not talk to me' verbal or non-verbal cues, you are a jerk.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)My guess is that he had a few pre-conceived notions of the type of response he felt entitled to in the first place-and got them shot down. Unwilling or unable to take the responsibility of his approach, he blames the object of it. I wish this was less common.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Simple as that.
Warpy
(111,267 posts)about the danger we face simply because we were born female.
It's pervasive. There is no real way to escape it. Because males are not taught that rape is wrong, the onus is completely on us to prevent it.
Men need to know how this has poisoned the relationship between the sexes. Sadly, some will never get it.
Bladian
(475 posts)I'm sorry, what?
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)'creature with latent rapist tendencies'.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 9, 2012, 11:29 PM - Edit history (1)
Maybe you did not mean all men.
high density
(13,397 posts)I sometimes have women stop, smile, and say hi to me as I walk by. Is she trying to rape me?
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Saying they're threatened or "creeped out" is just hiding how shallow they are.
niyad
(113,318 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)since there are more women than men. dumbassedness knows no gender boundries.
as a wise person once said "think about how stupid the average person is, then realize half the population is dumber than that."
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)And then lost me with the "men are not taught that rape is wrong" part.
Stealing is wrong, everyone knows it, and it is not my fault if I get robbed at gunpoint. However, in a bad neighborhood or a sketchy situation, you'd better believe that I cover myself. This does not poison my view of large swaths of the human race.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Wow. What a load of bollocks.
rainbow4321
(9,974 posts)Which is one of the reasons when I go on a smoke break at work I choose to stand and not sit.
Much easier to control my comfort zone with those who feel a need to approach me and stand alittletooclose or start with a casual hi and ends with kind of a stalkerish tone ("so when do you work next? What days? What shift? What floor do you work on? You drive or take the train", "how come you never sit down when you come down here, you're always standing up" .
Which are questions I wouldn't care about if they are asked by someone who I am a regular talker with or a close co-worker but when they are asked by someone I have never even talked to before....it makes me nervous.
One time I was in a particular "I don't wanna talk to anyone" mood so I went straight from the building to stand behind a little brick wall and one fellow I didn't know felt a need to pop around the corner and literally said "ah-ha, you thought you could hide, huh?" and then seemed kinda stood there talking with an amused look on his face that he had came and made sure I knew that he had "found me".
I'm really not anti-social but there are some situations that get me in flight mode very quickly...if that turns off some people who approach me, TOO BAD!
ecstatic
(32,705 posts)and/or when I'm outside at night. Its not fun having to be rude but they should put themselves in our shoes.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I don't like being hugged or forced to hug, but a lot of women do it without asking permission.
Do they think they are bestowing some kind of gift?
Talk about unasked for intrusions on personal space...
Brigid
(17,621 posts)They should not be doing that.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But you know what? Men feel fear lots of time from other men.
An argument at a kids baseball game could easily escalate into violence and we live in a world where bigger stronger men browbeat and intimidate smaller men with impunity.
I think that is often overlooked. But it is certainly a major issue with strong psychological impact.
REP
(21,691 posts)I don't like to be touched by people I don't know. I loathe social hugging.
On edit: shaking hands is cool, though.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)men are lucky to get such attention from them.
They really don't get or don't care that some men don't like that sort of thing.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)That is an invasion of personal space too, especially if it is a stranger.
pnwest
(3,266 posts)I've also used, "Exactly how's that information affect YOU?"
Berserker
(3,419 posts)wow that sets your alarm off? That's a really common statement I see nothing wrong with that. If we don't talk to a strange woman how do we ever meet you?
Lex
(34,108 posts)just because you are interested.
high density
(13,397 posts)That means we have to initiate that conversation with you when we are interested. You're correct that there is no "right" to a conversation, but there are better ways to handle it than getting all pissy about it. If you're not interested, respond with a pithy comment, feel flattered, and turn away.
Springslips
(533 posts)A straight men's dilemma, not to imply that women are in the wrong as they are not, is that we are expected to approach but then can get called a creep if we do, but if we don't, women will ask "why" and we will get called a "wimp," "passive," "unmanly." What are we to do?
It is really simple, have inner confidence that doesn't need validation from the reactions from women. Approach when you want to ( ideally at a good time, not in a dark parking lot or if she is obviously busy) and if she is not interested not to take it personally.
I see nothing wrong with the event that the OP describes except for the reaction of the guy, which just screams insecurity--he doesn't have inner confidence.
There is nothing we can do about the dilemma. What he should had done was notice that the OP wasn't interested, understand that she was uncomfortable being approach, and just chalk it up to how HE handled it, and not take it personally; he should of just walked away. That's what I do. I learned along time ago that rejection isn't personal, it is just what it is. The woman has no obligation to converse.
Also body language can tell you if someone is willing to chat. Many men can not read body language at all. I am sure the OP body was closed, her head was down, he should had noticed. Or the poster above talking about reading when guys would force themselves on her space. If a girl is looking at a book it is a pretty good clue that she isn't interested. This is not hard, yet so many men are mind blind to body language.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)high density
(13,397 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)The things that happen to women just don't happen to guys.
Lex
(34,108 posts)if they so choose to start asking her questions, and get irate if the woman is not interested in talking to them.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Your own safety and security is more important than any fear that you have of offending assholes.
A good Fuck Off can even prevent an offending asshole from taking it even further. They're caught off guard.
You can even through in an "Am I going to have to cut a muthafucka?" for effect. If you do, say it loud enough for him to hear you. But only use it as a last resort.
When they realize that you're not one to be fucked with they'll quickly move on to someone with whom they think that they can.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Somehow I don't think "Am I going to have to cut a muthafucka?" will work too well coming out of my mouth. ,
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)As a matter of fact, by telling them to "fuck off" with your size ought to give them added pause.
You just have to relay it convincingly.
DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)Just kinda glance down, disgusted. That will usually emasculate them.
That said, be always ready to move and know where you are going.
If the shit blows up, always keep in mind that thumbnails in tear ducts can work wonders.
BTW, I just love vertically-challenged women - with short fingernails.
DBH
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)You did right.
Some folks have an odd belief that imposing is being friendly or charming.
or he could have had ill-intent. How are you to know?
Michigan Alum
(335 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)knew me and it could have been the same for the OP.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)you, wont approach you at all."
"The Gift of Fear."
http://gavindebecker.com/resources/book/the_gift_of_fear/
The Gift of Fear is an important story with a powerful message, a story every woman must read.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #87)
hrmjustin This message was self-deleted by its author.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Never never never never happened.
Never.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)personally know of such a man or ten, I would STILL bet that, before they were attacked, they did NOT fear the woman.
Men simply do not fear stranger women, period. In fact, AS THE OP SHOWS, MEN FEEL SAFE ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY APPROACH STRANGER WOMEN. MEN DO NOT STOP TO THINK THE WOMAN MIGHT MUG, RAPE, OR MURDER THEM.
MEN DO NOT CROSS THE STREET TO AVOID A STRANGER WOMAN.
SO GET THE HELL REAL.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)since you've edited your original post to say something completely different than it does now. I don't blame you, since your original post was totally indefensible, but it makes it hard to have a discussion.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Even if a woman did exactly as this man did, to a man, that man would not fear her.
And, paraphrasing myself, I wrote that men simply do not fear women. That no man would fear a stranger woman in a dark alley at 3:00 a.m. I'll add why: Because a MAN in a dark alley at 3:00 a.m. would feel as if he HAD A RIGHT to be there. Men are not brought up not to go places like parks at night, or by themselves to bars, or poorly lit streets. Women are. Gee, I WONDER WHY.
I really do not have a clue as to what you think was so "indefensible".
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #103)
Starry Messenger This message was self-deleted by its author.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)It's just straight up wrong and you know it. That's why you edited your original post, because you KNOW that women can and do harm stranger men.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)How many edits is this post gonna get?
Look, women rob and kill people every day. Can we agree that this is true? Logically then, a man would be foolish NOT to be wary of a strange woman who approached him. Right?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)The OP states that the man stopped, attempted to initiate a conversation, was rebuffed, and then moved on. Nothing about the guy returning.
And the only reason I'm calling attention to your edits is because you're changing your posts completely, even to the titles. As I said, it's hard to have a discussion when half of it is a constantly changing chimera.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)The situation between men and women is equal then, in terms of potential violence? Interesting.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Do you believe that women possess some innate quality that makes them less violent than men?
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)Or you discussing genetics? Evolutionary psychology? Or physiology as in hormones--the link of aggressiveness associated with testosterone?
I was thinking more of socialization factors. Females are statistically far less violent than males. As social expectations change there has been a disturbing rise in violence from females, especially in young girls. Still, No where near the violence perpetuated by males, the violence is usually, perhaps overwhelmingly not sexual in nature.
A male has much more to fear from another male. Or do you really think he has to fear violence equally from either gender? I know you're trying to make a point, but I'm not seeing it yet.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)I respectfully disagree though. Studies have shown that women are as likely as men to engage in partner abuse and more likely to engage in child abuse. And as you noted, women are increasingly engaging in assault, robbery and other violent crimes. So yes, I assert that a man has just as much reason to fear violence from a stranger female as from a stranger male.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)The child abuse statistics has to do with proximity--not nessisarily gender, but as you point out, are close to equal. I would point out that looking at statistics alone doesn't take proximity into consideration, although when you add heterosexual partnered caregivers, males gain a few points. But that's not your point, is it?
Your point seems to be that females are committing violence in equal numbers as males, although I suspect your real point is that females are just as capable of violence as males.
The intimate partner violence statistics simply don't support your statement.
http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_FactSheet-a.pdf
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Look, my main point here is that most men dislike being treated as an incipient rapist when they've done nothing untoward. This was in answer to the OP's question, "Why is it some men get all offended if a woman they don't know is wary around them?". Can we agree that a person should not be prejudged because of their gender?
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)I thought it might be something like that. Women understand the majority of men are NOT rapists, but men should understand that women live in fear of the few that are. The actual statistics are vile, are we are taught to avoid people, places and situations where assault could occur.
Your link is references from a psychological study.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Here's the summary:
SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.
If you read through the entries there are some links to and summaries of the different studies. The information provided also allows you to find the original studies themselves. If you'd like I can provide additional links to even more studies.
So then, men should just accept being treated as incipient rapists. Got it.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)I try discussion instead of snark in these conversations. What I'm telling you is that statistically women have every right to be wary. In reality, we have every right to be wary. In actuality, we understand that the vast majority of men are NOT rapists.
The men in my life think rapists are the amongst the lowest form of human life. The men I know would stop any assault or harassment they saw. There is a growing movement among men to ally themselves with women in light of the violence against women statistics, and what women experience.
It doesn't have to be 'us against them' it can be a cooperative effort to make the world safer. The OP was expressing wariness, I don't blame her. You are defending your position as presumably, a man of honor, who has no wish to be seen as a rapist--ever. I don't blame you. There is room for dialogue and understanding here. It usually takes a bit to get there.
tblue37
(65,377 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 10, 2012, 03:59 PM - Edit history (1)
when strange men approach them in public and try to chat them up. Most men who do that do not stop until they are cut off curtly, and then they usually do take offense. We have experienced it, often. Just because you do not have a history of being subjected to such experiences, that doesn't mean that it is not upsetting and often terrifying for us when we are subjected to that experience.
I assume (hope) that if you tried to chat up a strange woman and she indicated that she did not want your attentions, you would back off.
But most of us women have had a lot of experience that tells us that men who approach us uninvited in public and try to chat us up will not back off willingly. No matter when we indicate that we no longer wish to chat (read "flirt," because that is what they are aiming at, and what they are demanding that we do in return), at that point they become annoyed at the very least, and often furious and threatening toward us for daring to rebuff their advances, no matter how politely or unoffensively we try to do it.
If we try to cut off the "flirtation" at the first "Hi" or the first question, they get angry. If we try to end it at any other point, they get angry. They do not think we have a right to refuse their advances at all.
When a woman has been subjected to many such approaches, she will naturally become wary of any strange man who approaches her uninvited and tries to strike up a conversation. And when she has had many such experiences, it is not unreasonable for her to make a general comment noting that such men tend to get pissed when we do not wish to chat with them, and wondering why they should get so pissed off, when they had no right to demand our attention in the first place.
Remember, when a strange man approaches a woman like that and persists in trying to chat when she doesn't indicate a willingness to chat with him, what he is doing is trying to force a flirtation on her. Flirtation is what such chatting is about, and no one has a right to force a woman to flirt with him, even if he knows her, but certainly not if she is a complete stranger!
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Martin S. Fiebert of the Department of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, has compiled an annotated bibliography of research relating to spousal abuse by women on men. This bibliography examines 275 scholarly investigations: 214 empirical studies and 61 reviews and/or analyses that appear to demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 365,000.[146] In a Los Angeles Times article about male victims of domestic violence, Fiebert suggests that "...consensus in the field is that women are as likely as men to strike their partner but thatas expectedwomen are more likely to be injured than men."[118] However, he noted, men are seriously injured in 38% of the cases in which "extreme aggression" is used. Fiebert additionally noted that his work was not meant to minimize the serious effects of men who abuse women.
In a review of the research however Michael Kimmel found that violence is instrumental in maintaining control and that more than 90% of "systematic, persistent, and injurious" violence is perpetrated by men. He points out that most of the empirical studies that Fiebert reviewed used the same empirical measure of family conflict, i.e., the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) as the sole measure of domestic violence and that many of the studies noted by Fiebert discussed samples composed entirely of single people younger than 30, not married couples. Kimmel argues that among various other flaws, the CTS is particularly vulnerable to reporting bias because it depends on asking people to accurately remember and report what happened during the past year. Men tend to underestimate their use of violence, while women tend to overestimate their use of violence. Simultaneously men tend to overestimate their partner's use of violence while women tend to underestimate their partner's use of violence. Thus, men will likely overestimate their victimization, while women tend to underestimate theirs.
Similarly, the National Institute of Justice states that some studies finding equal or greater frequency of abuse by women against men are based on data compiled through the Conflict Tactics Scale. This survey tool was developed in the 1970s and may not be appropriate for intimate partner violence research because it does not measure control, coercion, or the motives for conflict tactics; it also leaves out sexual assault and violence by ex-spouses or partners and does not determine who initiated the violence. Furthermore, the NIJ contends that national surveys supported by NIJ, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics that examine more serious assaults do not support the conclusion of similar rates of male and female spousal assaults. These surveys are conducted within a safety or crime context and clearly find more partner abuse by men against women.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)Always somewhere that has video cameras running.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)you can watch the first 3 minutes for free but to see the rest you have to be a paying member.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Violence or the threat of it is damaging and men face the threat of getting punched by other men more, I daresay, than women.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)Studies have shown women are just as likely to engage in partner abuse as men and are even more likely to engage in child abuse than men are.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Men are built and designed for violence, especially so among the primates.
Violence is an enormously important fact in evolutionary biology.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Statistics put out by the USDOJ:
Trends in family violence
The rate of family violence fell between 1993 and 2002 from an estimated 5.4 victims to 2.1 victims per 1,000 U.S. residents age 12 or older. Throughout the period family violence accounted for about 1 in 10 violent victimizations.
------
Forty percent of family violence victims were injured during the incident. Of the 3.5 million victims of family violence between 1998 and 2002, less than 1% died as a result of the incident.
------
The majority (73%) of family violence victims were female. Females were 84% of spouse abuse victims and 86% of victims of abuse at the hands of a boyfriend or girlfriend.
While about three-fourths of the victims of family violence were female, about three-fourths of the persons who committed family violence were male.
Llewlladdwr
(2,165 posts)http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.
Response to Llewlladdwr (Reply #144)
JTFrog This message was self-deleted by its author.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Social exchange is the point of a relationship.
Advice to guys: "Make the approach". "Nothing ventured, nothing gained". "Tell her how you feel".
Advice to women: "carry pepper spray in case he does it poorly".
Fuckin' paranoia. You'd never know that violent crime is at a 40 year low, and that the homicide rate is one-half of what it was in 1991.
Did you know that from 2000 to 2010, the number of men arrested for violent crimes dropped by 11.8%, but the number of women arrested for violent crimes went up 0.7%
Also, the number of men arrested for property crimes dropped 7.2% while the number of women arrested increased 27.1% in the same time period.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/overviews/tab33overview.pdf
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)If no initial interaction is possible?
Or is it entirely up to women to initiate all relationships with men passively standing out of the way, staring at the ground like a middle school dance?
This guy was a weirdo. Let's not extrapolate too much from that.
/change the group being targeted from men to any other.
//"The nicest black guy, the black guy with no self-serving agenda whatsoever, the one who wants nothing from you, wont approach you at all."
//"The nicest Jew, the Jew with no self-serving agenda whatsoever, the one who wants nothing from you, wont approach you at all."
Scout
(8,624 posts)no one said that. but have fun arguing with your straw man.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)"The nicest guy, the guy with no self-serving agenda whatsoever, the one who wants nothing from you, wont approach you at all."
This was said and was in fact what I responding to.
That statement, without further qualifiers, means that no decent male can ever initiate conversation with any woman. He must wait and reciprocate at most.
/did you not read the comment I was responding to? You probably should next time.
arboretum
(27 posts)It was one guy. One of 3 billion or so.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)then it is not about you.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)and you handled it well.
no big deal.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Hell.. I still get carded when trying to buy wine and beer..
I just fake smile and keep it moving..
I had empty beers thrown at me once, when I did not respond to a guy..He walked across the road, started yelling expletives about me being too good to talk to him and then the bottle throwing commenced...
Not worth losing my life over
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)I see that sexism is okay on DU if it's from women about men.
O-kay.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)...and have been for my entire adult life, and I've experienced women changing their behavior as I walk down he street. I completely understand it and just feel sorry for the fact that they have any reason to be afraid in the first place. I remember it got especially bad around my college campus. There were a string of rapes, and all of the women were understandably on edge.
As much as I'd love to say "Please, don't be afraid, I have zero desire to do you any sort of harm whatsoever," I know that saying anything at all would only make it worse, so if they look at me, I just smile and nod my head and go about my business. I've also learned to either quicken my pace to move ahead or slow my pace down to fall behind of a woman that is clearly made nervous by my presence. Just makes sense.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)... exist still. But I have to say some of the things in here said about men i do have to take offense to. Maybe all the people who responded to this thread should take a breath and think before they say things. What the OP said is a real problem for women. We should discuss the problems women have in our society. But some of the people who posted should remember we are not all creeps or pigs thank you very much.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Had the OP mentioned the spoken "line," hell yes, I can understand why she'd be creeped out.
Completely inappropriate line to say to anyone, IMO, and if someone said it to me, I'd say, "none of your business, creep."
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)that really offended you?
Just say "No, I am not staying out of trouble"....smile and move on with your life.
I don't get it.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)the "hi" was fine...his additional comment was weird.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)what he said could be creepy from a stranger or quite mundane from a (perceived) acquaintance.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)any stranger, male or female (and I'm a male by the way), who asked me if I am staying out of trouble would get a raised eyebrow...it's an overly familiar kind of remark to make to a stranger.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)if it was a friend of a friend i met a couple of weeks ago i would just take it as an attempt to say hi. if not, creepsville for sure.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Permanut
(5,609 posts)it's working perfectly. This from a non-dangerous male who would never ask such a creepy question of a stranger, man or woman.
FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)one thing. Women are very well aware of whether a guy is just being a nice, friendly person, or is trying to hit on you. It's second nature to us. We are quite aware of it. I'm sure men know also when someone is showing them more than a friendly interest. Something else I know, men are much more likely to respond to such a hit than women are - they have a lot less to lose.
Instructions to any guy who wants to hit on a gal - don't be obvious, and DON'T act like a puppy dog. I once went out dancing with my boyfriend when another guy asked me to dance - first time I ever saw him. I did, and he proceeded to explain to me how good he was in bed - I kid you not. Obviously, he came across as completely pathetic. Almost made me sorry for his cluelessness. The stories we women could tell!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)All kinds of answers pop into my head that are inappropriate like, "Well, yes, ever since I was let out of my axe murder sentence early."
People who ask questions like this think they are being cute. To me at least, they always come off badly.
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)Most are not, but I have been around enough of them to know they are out there.
I apologize for the ones who who are out there are from the bottom of my heart,
Don
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and i can say it repeatedly, often and always.
yes.
and thanks for getting it even though "Most are not"
MizzM
(77 posts)For years, as a young thing, I was an airline attendant (stewardess in those days). I gave dazzling smiles to all those perfect strangers (men and women). It was safe and part of the job. After leaving that profession, I continued to smile back at unknown men who smiled at me on the street. Had to stop that pretty darn quick. Too bad even a smile can give the wrong impression to some. When a stranger (man) smiles at you, what's he saying? "You look really cheery, so I think I will smile at you, "You are attractive and I would really like you to smile back at me," or "Give me a smile, and I'll be all over you if I get the chance," or something else? I don't know how guys think. Help me out here.
dawg
(10,624 posts)I was at the grocery store last week. I go there to get groceries, not to ogle women, but I couldn't help noticing one of the other shoppers. She was late 30's or early 40's, basically around my age, and she was wearing skin tight yoga pants or something similar. I'm not saying that to criticize her choice of clothes or to suggest that she was inviting attention from men or anything like that. It's just that she was in really good shape, and really well-proportioned, and my Y chromosome would not allow me to *not* notice her - especially since she was making her shopping rounds in front of me most of the time. (No, I wasn't following her. I was just getting my groceries ).
As I was saying, I didn't ogle this woman but I couldn't help notice her. And towards the end of my shopping trip, when I whipped around the corner of the aisle I was briefly face to face with her. My eyes instinctively went to her face for a second to "check her out". Our eyes locked for an instant and I gave her a quick little smile. She smiled back.
This is how I interpret those smiles. My smile meant: "I got caught checking you out. I think you're cute."
Her smile meant: "I know you think I'm cute. I'm flattered."
Of course, I may have misinterpreted the whole thing. It's possible that she only perceived me as being friendly in a completely non-sexual way and was merely returning the sentiment. On the other hand, it's also possible that her smile could have been meant, "I think you're cute, too. Come up with a reason to talk to me!"
I wasn't interested in talking to her. I'm not at that point in my life. But situations like this pose a real dilemma for single men. Most of us don't want to come across as creeps. But neither do we want to miss the opportunity to meet pretty women in tight yoga pants who might be interested in us.
But one thing is clear. No one has the right to our attention. No one has the right to feel or act indignant if their overtures are rebuffed.
MizzM
(77 posts)Thanks for your lovely reply. Yes, words are not the only way to communicate.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)I saw this gorgeous Samoan man standing in be farmers market wearing this only little skirt thing. He was in very good shape and was very beautiful. I was, (and still am married) so I stole little glances, oh hell I may have smiled as well. He smiled back. And that is the end of the story. I went my way.
Unfortunately in our world, women live in constant fear or a kind of fight or flight state when we are alone and vulnerable. For women who deal with unwanted approach a lot, there is burnout as well.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Nope. NOT cool if you change the group being stereotyped.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)you can see them start to tightly clutch their handbag, despite the fact that the black man is dressed in a business suit....
Romulox
(25,960 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)not walk too close to women as it could be threatening to them.
Just change your behavior a little bit to make someone else more comfortable. You're not a bad guy maybe, but there's no way of knowing what experiences that woman has had with men so just be considerate and think of her feelings rather than your own.
Imagine such a post standing that said the same of black people on elevators. Just wait for the next one, you might be one of the good ones but you don't know the experiences that white person on there first had with black people. So just be considerate and think of his/her feelings rather than your own.
One stands and is seen as sage advice.
The other would be insta-banned and is undeniably bigoted.
Both are based on the same premise.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)creepy comment, you had every reason to be wary.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Men have the right to try to start any conversation they want in any manner they want. (It may or may not be wise, especially if a woman is giving off "leave me alone" signals.)
What they don't have is grounds to be offended (or act like it there is something wrong with the woman they targeted) if it doesn't turn out the way they hoped.
HOWEVER, I get as much nastiness from women who I choose to not "make nice" with as I do from men. Many times, I don't want to be bothered when I am out in the world and I just want to go about my business.
And to be honest, I get as much nasty attitude from women I don't want to chat with as I do from men.
I think some of it is the difference between introverts and extraverts. Introverts want to be left alone. Extraverts want to connect with everybody and sometimes get annoyed when an introvert isn't on board with that.
Guaranteed I will not be nice to anyone, male or female, who wants to start a conversation with me, if I am not in the mood for it. I am not "extra mean" to men. My "stay away from me" attitude is equal opportunity.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)1 of every 6 women will be assaulted in their lifetime. Some studies put the number at 1 in 3, and there are studies that show that female college students are raped at insane numbers. Most of these assaults, and rapes, are perpetrated by men. Men have been the privileged gender in most societies in the world for centuries, if not millennia. That is starting to change, slowly, very slowly.
One of the privileges men have lost is the right to approach any woman they want, in any manner they want. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. Before, men were obligated to open doors for women, and all sorts of "chivalrous" behavior. Society no longer requires that of them (with cultural variations - just as there are cultural variations as to how far equality has been put into practice.) Now they're obligated to assess whether their approach will be welcome BEFORE they make said approach.
First, they need to assess the locale of said potential approach - are they alone in an elevator? Extra caution needed. In fact, if they are in any place where the woman is alone/it's dark/the woman has no easy way to get away (for example if they're on a bus, or tram) the man should let the woman approach him, or only approach her if she signals very clearly that she is open to being approached.
Which brings us to the second point of checking whether an approach would be welcome. The man needs to assess the woman's body language. Are they sharing eye contact? Does she smile at him? Roll her eyes over something that happened so they can laugh about it together? Then, by all means, initiate conversation. However, if she isn't looking at him at all/is reading/looking out the window/hunching her shoulders/listening to music/turns away slightly/is engrossed with her smartphone, then she is not open to an approach., and the guy should stay away.
Women aren't obligated to respond to every ouverture she is given - for young women, that's quite a lot of interruptions every day. This cartoon may illustrate the phenomenon:
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)*is* a woman.
So perhaps you don't speak for all 3.5 billion or so women on planet earth.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)sometimes the guy/girl gets the object of their attention with that. But it is just fantasy on the most part.
A mother worth her salt will teach her little ones not to believe too much of what they see and hear
from a movie.
Tikki
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Next time don't say hi, just nod and don't give them the opening for bad pickup lines.
Was he the same age group as you, younger or older?
geardaddy
(24,931 posts)I'd have the same reaction as you.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)don't prepare them for understanding the vulnerabilities of being a woman.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)What that guy said to you is very creepy.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)I keed. I keed. Kind of.
More seriously, there is a shotgun mating strategy where hitting up women, almost randomly, leads to low frequency success, but higher overall rates of success than if they were more courteous and selection.
The offense comes when either they really liked what they saw or have recently had a successful run.
Irritating rude people by denying them what they want is just part of life.
Whovian
(2,866 posts)more than that. Being a man, I know how many of us think and act. Glad you had the "look" that sent him packing.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)"Being a man, I know how many of us think and act."
H2O Man
(73,553 posts)Some men are assholes. This includes several sub-groups, such as flaming assholes, stupid assholes, etc.
By no coincidence, some women are assholes, too. More, the female sub-groups, while not "exact" to those of the males, include large areas that actually overlap.
It is important, at least in my opinion, to recognize that even good people can (and do) say or do stupid things, from time to time. For, in the end, we are all sad and weakly human.
In the example you provided, we can determine that this fellow did not have what we know as "boundaries." For better ow worse, we can really only speculate on the reasons for his behavior. He might have intended no harm, and merely acted like a fool. Or, he might have been an asshole of the flaming variety.
Either way, we can conclude that you responded in the appropriate way. That, of course, comes as no surprise to me: for you are an intelligent human being.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)was really bad at it. That's a weird question to ask someone you don't know.
Springslips
(533 posts)Let me answer point by point.
"Why is it that some men get offended if a women they don't know is wary around them?"
A--because they are insecure and you made them feel bad about themselves. ( Which is not your problem btw. You have the right to react anyway you feel to.)
"Just a few minutes ago. . . "Are you staying out of trouble?"
A--it sounds like the guy got bad advice on how to approach women. He does have the right to approach you, you never know what healthy relationship you may find my meeting new people, but obviously you weren't likewise minded, which is perfectly ok, and up to you.
"BTW my mother taught. . . Teaches her daughter that."
A--This sounds too passive and or paranoid for me to agree. But if it is what you want it is up too you. It is socially fine.
"Why should I be obliged to drop my guard. . . "
A--You are not obliged. There is no social rule for when or when not to talk to strange guys. It sound a little like you are unsure of yourself. Why has the guys reaction bothered you so? This is the more important question. Do emotional sanctions by other make you feel bad about your actions, make you feel socially inadequate. I am asking because I always wonder about people who bitch about the other gender when the situation they bitch about doesn't seem like anything to get upset about. A insecure guy approaches a strange woman with a awkward line and the woman gives him a dirty look. The insecure guy throws a fit. It sounds like he has a problem not you. So what is your angst about?
You can't control him, but you can accept yourself.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)As another male poster said, I'm very careful not to walk up on women or at least walk/run past them quickly and not say a word.
If *some* women had a nasty habit of beating we men routinely with baseball bats, I might get a tad nervous around strange women. Thankfully that's not the case.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)Gift of Fear, I thought it was really excellent and clear. I like the way he encourages us all to honor our instincts.
Here is a site with his quotes, and here is one that seems to apply to this thread:
intuition is always right in at least two important ways;
It is always in response to something.
it always has your best interest at heart
― Gavin de Becker, The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence
http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/31933.Gavin_de_Becker
Here is another site listing his survival signals.
The capable face-to-face criminal is an expert at keeping his victim from seeing survival signals, but the very methods he uses to conceal them can reveal them.
1. FORCED TEAMING (The Gift of Fear, by Gavin de Becker, pg. 64-66):
Forced teaming is an effective way to establish premature trust because a were-in-the-same-boat attitude is hard to rebuff without feeling rude. Sharing a predicament, like being stuck in an elevator or arriving simultaneously at a just-closed store, will understandably move people around social boundaries. But forced teaming is not about coincidence; it is intentional and directed, and it is one of the most sophisticated manipulations. The detectable signal of forced teaming is the projection of a shared purpose or experience where none exists: Both of us; Were on the same team; How are we going to handle this?; Now weve done it, etc.
http://www.womynwarrior.com/2011/06/gavin-de-beckers-survival-signals
Anyone who thinks this is paranoid has not been forced in a situation. Trust your instinct
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)And, how he says women, in his opinion, have this Gift more than men do, but are trained by society not to use it -- as many responses in this thread prove. He illustrates this with several stories of women being creeped, but who were shamed into not being judgemental, and wound up abducted and raped.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Seriously, the thought never crossed your mind that maybe this person sucked at striking up small talk, but was interested in meeting you? Instead, you throw on your tin foil hat. You knew you acted terrible, which is why you felt the need to add "Why should I be obliged to drop my guard just to avoid offending some guy I never saw before, and won't see again? I don't see any reason myself."
Based on what you posted, the person I see the bigger issue with is you.
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)And, as Gavin de Becker has stated, this type of reasoning is why many women ignore their "gift of fear" and are attacked, and sometimes murdered.
The OP needs to keep her gift of fear.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)You can be smart and protective of yourself without being an asshole. This person clearly knew they were an asshole, hence the attempt at justifying it.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)It's amazing how many men can't take a hint, so I don't bother with subtlety anymore. I was on my way to get cat food, that is all. I wasn't looking for a hookup.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)I simply said the encounter said more about you than him.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Sorry if my handling of this situation doesn't meet with your approval, but here's no time to be Ms. Manners when you're dealing with unwanted "attention" on the street.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)I have been a manager for 3 years now and it is really tiring managing a group of adults who act like kindergartners. A simple concept like assume positive intent is lost when people can play the pity game.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)OK, I'm done. Bye.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Someone approaches you and tries to pick you up. You have 2 choices (among many): politely let them know you are not interested or be a dick to them. Unless they provide a clear reason (i.e. they are crude to you), no reasonable person can think being a dick is the right approach.
I am a straight person who has ZERO problem with gay people (I am a ardent supporter of gay rights), but the thought of partaking in homosexual activities turns my stomach. About a year ago, I had a guy try to pick me up at Barnes and Noble. I was taken aback at first, but quickly realized that is how gay people meet others, just like straight people - introduce yourself and try to strike up a conversation. I was polite to him, but made it clear I had to move along. The thought of justifying me being an asshole to him because "I am tired of people trying to pick me up" NEVER crossed my mind. I am saddened that not only did it cross someones mind, but they firmly believe it is a reasonable approach. And we wonder why civility in politics (and life in general) is fucking shit.
renie408
(9,854 posts)in this thread.
And I only got about 1/4 of the way down.
Not sure I can take skimming through all of them.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It gets worse.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I smile and say Hi, and then shut up. The idea is to let the woman know that I mean no harm and am just there waiting for the bus. If she decides to engage in conversation, I'm glad to do that, but won't try to start a conversation myself. I think it's polite to acknowledge other people who are going to be in the same place, but that's it. I'd move to the other end of the bus stop and try not to create any sense of insecurity in that person.
I do the same if it's a man standing there when I come up.
prefunk
(157 posts)Are you sure it wasn't simply embarrassment at being rebuffed?
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)No one has a right to expect politeness from a stranger in certain circumstances. A nod is all one should expect.
prefunk
(157 posts)I asked the OP what "He left in a huff" meant. That is a very ambiguous and opinionated statement, and it tells us nothing about what really happened.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)him if he has stopped staying underfoot.
Darth_Kitten
(14,192 posts)Let him get all huffy.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)You don't owe random strangers anything. If he left all huffy, that is his problem. Women have to trust our instincts because our instincts are usually pretty doggone good. If they guy gave you a creepy vibe, it was because he was being creepy. That's his problem and you do not owe him anything.
glowing
(12,233 posts)stand around talking to him (which I was busy with another guest at the time), I even managed a good morning.... Then, he claims I have an attitude or I "don't like him" and that he's not some "creep trying to hit on me". Furthest thing from my mind at all when I was busy with other things going on. Why must I stand around talking about stupid stuff to a man I don't care all that much about? I don't mind being nice and helping with real things that they have going on or needing directions, but if you are just a lonely dude who wants to waste my time on stupid bs, why is it I somehow have the attitude or I have something against them? Stupid crap all the time... And they say women always talk too much.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)I hate to say 'hi' or 'hello' to anybody when it is not called for and don't when ever possible. Most can see the reasons from reading from above. Most people that know me, believe me to be a friendly person when i am known in personal manner. Yea, getting ridiculed and other negative comments come from people who think someone should be like this or that. In me being such a way at least there is knowing i am not a buyer or a seller of any B.S. I work on being with the up and up and it works best for me that way
patrice
(47,992 posts)worth beyond their basic human rights.
A person can choose to do that sort of thing, prove social value to others, but that choice IS your own right so it is based upon respect for your own basic human rights.
If I were in a situation like the one you describe, my sense of my human right to respect would include whether *I* am the one who chooses to engage in any talk of how I might or I might not be "... staying out of trouble." There is no answer to such a question that works for my respect for myself. Both, TTE, "Yes" or "No" violate my self-governance, which is the source of the dignity that is an important part of my identity.
The question he asked you was more manipulative than it was purely social. Manipulation can be a full-blown clinical personality disorder. It's too bad that so many people, male or female, have become soooooooooooo dependent upon external reinforcers for their own self-worth that they either no longer recognize what they require of others to prove to themselves or no longer care.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)And you didn't know this guy?
Unless you're 8 and all alone that's a really bizarre thing to do.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)"I was until you got here" is the correct answer to that question.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)I gotta remember that one.
spooky3
(34,456 posts)I think you did the right thing.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)If you did not know me you might be alarmed by my appearance. My appearance is my choice but I do understand that it is human to judge a book by its cover. That said, if I am forced into an encounter with a female of any age who does not know me, I give them as much space as possible and they are addressed as ma'am. (btw, I treat unknown males of any age the same way but address them as sir). I find giving strangers a bit of extra space is helpful.
For example, we had 33 cars parked in our warehouses parking lot the other night, they were there for the Justin Bieber concert. As the show was about to let out a car pulled up blocking the only exit from our lot. I went up to the car, caught the attention of the lady in it, made the 'roll your window down' motion with my hand, then I backed up five or so feet. The lady locked her door, (i have that affect), rolled her window down about six inches then told me she was waiting for her kids to get out of the show. "Yes ma'am, well you are blocking the exit to the cars in my lot and they will be wanting out pretty soon too. If you back up few feet into our lot, you can wait there and when you are ready I will assist getting your car out too." She did as instructed. She relaxed a bit after backing up into our lot, rolled her window down further and asked if I knew the best way to get to I-5 southbound. I re-aproached her car but still kept that five foot distance and politely gave her the directions she would need to get to I-5 once her kids got there. While waiting we chatted a bit more, and when the time came I assisted getting her and everyone else out of our lot. At no time did I approach any of these strangers closer than 5 feet and it was always the 'yes sir or ma'am' respect from me.
That is my advice, for a little bit of safety to all, myself included, give strangers just a little extra space when first interacting with them.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)is how I have grown to view it over the years. I love Louis CK because his show really does highlight how bizarre city life can be. I love when he sees something weird and then just moves on like OK.
Just say hello back to defuse the situation but have your best tough girl stance and stare ready if they try to go too far. I have had some really sick things said to me by guys and some of the worst were by guys in business suits. Being petite made it worse for me sometimes because some guys think their size can be intimidating.
In most cases guys are harmless but you never know. I sometimes feel sorry for guys and have found some of their approaches amusing. In a way no matter how they approach you the first time it can easily turn to embarrassing or creepy with the wrong words The human mating ritual is sometimes hilarious.
In the case of creeps the best thing to do is always be aware of your surroundings and keeping your eye on anyone suspicious. Also don't be fooled by superficial things. Some of the best dressed guys are the biggest creeps.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)I do understand why women are wary around strange men, especially if they are trying to repeatably hit on them or something. Given the number of women that are victims of rape it only makes sense to be cautious. I've never really experienced women acting wary around me, but I'm pretty shy so maybe that factors into it.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)You're not obligated in the least to make conversation with a passer by. 90% of normal guys would agree. This one sounds like a weird dude. Try to forget it.
polly7
(20,582 posts)It's funny though, my Uncles ask me that nearly every time we call each other on the phone ... "Hi, you behaving yourself / staying out of trouble?" I love them so much and find it pretty cute they think I'm still a brat or something. But .... totally different of course, than this unknown man to you. I would have found that quite weird also.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Women have about men who are strangers. If they don't, then they are inconsiderate.
For example, if I was a man getting on an elevator with a woman, I would let her establish her position for the ride either in the front or next to the control panel so she could stop the car and get out if she felt threatened. I've heard men say They should drive the elevator car out of courtesy, but I remind them that even "frail" women can usually muster the strength to push the buttons.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)In most instances men let women proceed them through a door. If a woman expects this, then she is likely to plunge into the elevator ahead of the man. And most of the time she is not going to do as you say and establish herself at the front. Instead she will move to the back of the elevator in politeness.
But this puts me between her and the exit. A strange man between her and the exit, in a very tiny room at that, is uncomfortable. Realistically, it doesn't matter, but we're talking psychology here, not physics.
I read once that proper etiquette is for the man to enter the elevator first for this reason. And I make every attempt to do just that. But as I stated above, it catches women off guard. And has gotten me some looks. One man did call me on it once giving me the opportunity to point out why I was actually following correct protocol. The woman I "cut off" said that hadn't occurred to her, but that she did appreciate it now that I had brought it up.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 12, 2012, 05:33 PM - Edit history (1)
of thought going in to something mundane like riding an elevator. If the guy is going to attack the woman then it doesn't really matter where he stands does it?
And the same holds true if he he's just going to stand there quietly.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)I acknowledged in my post that it didn't really make any sense where you stand.
As to all the thought, I am very introspective and observant.
I am also scary looking. A little tough-as-nails, Puerto Rican gal with attitude told me at work once. And looking back on my life, I realized how often that would explain things. For that matter, I remember people alluding to that fact when I was in high school, but thought they were kidding given that I never saw the man too little for me to run away from.
So I try a little harder to not worry women.
That can actually make it worse. If you seem too aware, people figure that might be because you are up to no good.
Sometimes you just can't win.
On the other hand it has worked good for me a few times. The only person I ever knew who shouted at her employees where I work - contrary to what Hollywood would have you believe, shouting at your employees in a professional environment is a quick way to the unemployment line - shouted at me once. She shouted. I straightened up in my chair. Because that is what people do when they are being shouted at. My straightening up apparently scared the bejeebus out of her.
Others started noticing that she didn't shout when I was in the room. So I ended up invited to a whole lot of meetings unrelated to my work!
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)You can let her establish her position by moving towards a rear corner, if available.
Yeah, it's alot to think through in a brief period of time.
Proles
(466 posts)important to realize that most guys aren't thinking of raping women.
Be cautious, but don't be overly paranoid either. It's a shame we live in a world where people can't trust one another, or exchange simply pleasantries without being labled a "creep."
Response to Proles (Reply #366)
Name removed Message auto-removed