Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 09:25 AM Oct 2012

Afghanistan: Ryan launched into rehearsed gibberish and Biden smacked him down.

From the transcript:

REP. RYAN: Let me bring some -- let me try and illustrate the issue here, because I think this -- it can get a little confusing. We’ve all met with General Allen and General Scaparotti in Afghanistan to talk about fighting seasons. Here’s the way it works. The mountain passes fill in with snow. The Taliban and the terrorists and the Haqqani and the Quetta shura come over from Pakistan to fight our men and women. When it fills in with snow, they can’t do it. That’s what we call fighting seasons. In the warm months fighting gets really high; in the winter it goes down.

And so when Admiral Mullen and General Petraeus came to Congress and said, if you pull these people out before the fighting season is end, it puts people more at risk -- that’s the problem. Yes, we drew 22,000 troops down last month. But the remaining troops that are there, who still have the same mission to prosecute, counterinsurgency, are doing it with fewer people.

That makes them less safe.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Inaudible.)

REP. RYAN: We’re sending fewer people out in all these hot spots to do the same job that they were supposed to do a month ago --

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Because we turned it over --

REP. RYAN: -- but we took 22,000 people out for them to do it.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: -- we turned it over to the Afghan troops we trained. No one got pulled out that didn’t get filled in by trained Afghan personnel. And he’s -- he’s -- he’s conflating two issues. The fighting season that Petraeus was talking about and former -- and Admiral Mullen was the fighting season this spring. That’s what he was talking about. We did not -- we did not pull them out.

REP. RYAN: The calendar works the same every year. (Chuckles.)

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: It does work the same every year. (Inaudible) -- there --

REP. RYAN: (Chuckles.) Spring, summer, fall -- (chuckles) -- it’s warm or it’s not. They’re still fighting us, they’re still coming over the passes, they’ll -- they’re still coming in to Zabul or to Kunar, to all of these areas, but we are sending fewer people to the front to fight them. And that is not safe.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That’s right, because that’s the Afghan responsibility. We’ve trained them.

REP. RYAN: Not in the East.

MS. RADDATZ: Let’s move -- let’s move to another war.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Not in the East? (Inaudible) --

REP. RYAN: (Inaudible) -- East, RC-East --

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: RC-East, most dangerous place in the world.

REP. RYAN: That’s why -- that’s why we don’t want to send fewer people to do the job.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That’s -- that’s why we should send Americans in to do the job instead of the -- you’d rather Americans be going in and doing the job instead of -- (inaudible) --

REP. RYAN: No. We are already sending Americans to do the job --

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No --

REP. RYAN: -- but fewer of them. That’s the whole point.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That -- that’s right. We’re sending in more Afghans to do the job, Afghans to do the job.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/us/politics/full-transcript-of-the-vice-presidential-debate.html

Ryan rehearsed some inaccurate points, having no knowledge about how these come together, and when he tried to connect the dots, Biden nailed his ass.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Afghanistan: Ryan launched into rehearsed gibberish and Biden smacked him down. (Original Post) ProSense Oct 2012 OP
Simple: Paul Ryan has ZERO foreign policy experience, Biden has PLENTY of it. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #1
Watching the exchange ProSense Oct 2012 #2
Yup, Ryan was once again on the wrong side of history. If there's one thing JaneyVee Oct 2012 #3
I can't believe this guy was ProSense Oct 2012 #4
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
1. Simple: Paul Ryan has ZERO foreign policy experience, Biden has PLENTY of it.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 09:37 AM
Oct 2012

That was my favorite part of the foreign policy debate, Biden showing what war-mogering neocons the GOP is wanting to put American lives in danger instead of transitioning.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Watching the exchange
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 09:43 AM
Oct 2012

it was clear as day. Ryan's posture changed when he realized Biden honed in on his bullshit. The part about the spring was telling, but when Ryan went down the path about sending more American troops into harms way, it was clear that he was out of his league.

On top of that, what an absurd rationalization.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
3. Yup, Ryan was once again on the wrong side of history. If there's one thing
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 09:52 AM
Oct 2012

Americans hate & are sick of, it's endle$$ war.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. I can't believe this guy was
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 02:39 PM
Oct 2012

arguing about sending more Americans instead of Afghans into harms way and it's not a big story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Afghanistan: Ryan launche...