Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 10:28 AM Oct 2012

Martha Raddatz on Social Security

During the vice-presidential debate Martha Raddatz used her position as debate moderator to ask the candidates about the impending bankruptcies of Social Security and Medicare. It was incredibly irresponsible to use such a loaded term to refer to the financial problems facing these programs.

Both Social Security and Medicare are projected to face shortfalls over their 75-year planning horizon, however these shortfalls are not accurately described as "bankruptcy." This phrase undoubtedly leads many people to believe that there is a prospect that the programs would go out of business.

Polls consistently show that a majority of young people believe that they stand to get nothing back from Social Security when they retire. That is of course not true unless Congress were to vote to eliminate the program. Under the latest projections they would stand to get a larger benefit than current retirees even if nothing is ever done to change the program's finances. It is unlikely that listeners would understand this to be the case based on Raddatz's comment.




http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/martha-raddatz-on-social-security-what-would-you-do-about-the-united-states-imperalistic-foreign-policy

More at the link...

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Martha Raddatz on Social Security (Original Post) PETRUS Oct 2012 OP
Why not, that is what the republicans have been saying along with the media. Biden could have still_one Oct 2012 #1

still_one

(92,302 posts)
1. Why not, that is what the republicans have been saying along with the media. Biden could have
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 10:34 AM
Oct 2012

refuted it, but instead choose to focus that these programs would eventually have problems if something was not done. He also promised that the Democrats would NEVER privatize social security and medicare, something that ryan would not address, and Joe also noted that if they had privatized it like bush and ryan wanted to, the system would be bankrupt by now after the financial crisis. I did not have a problem with the question, and it was answered beautifully by Joe Biden.

For one thing most people cannot grasp the complexity of many things, and it is important to keep it simple, and answer with simple factual answers


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Martha Raddatz on Social ...