Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 02:59 PM Oct 2012

Next time a Republican brings up Libya

And the fact that a DIFFERENT EMBASSY was denied extra security, remind them of this:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/jon-soltz/-romney-wouldnt-have-move_b_1790850.html

Not worth spending money to kill Blin Laden, not worth "moving heaven and earth".

Remind them of just how much Romey cares about eliminating the perpetrator of an act that left thousands of people dead.

They wanted Bin Laden as the eternal bogeyman. Shout Romney's folly from the rooftops next time the issue of military funding comes up.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Next time a Republican brings up Libya (Original Post) Mutiny In Heaven Oct 2012 OP
There were many more embassies attacked under Bush...but they have amnesia about that rfranklin Oct 2012 #1
They cannot be allowed to get away with this Mutiny In Heaven Oct 2012 #2
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
1. There were many more embassies attacked under Bush...but they have amnesia about that
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 03:15 PM
Oct 2012

On Fox News, Charles Krauthammer suggested that "under other presidents, particularly Bush," there was "no storming of the U.S. embassy in Cairo." In fact, there were seven attacks on U.S. embassies and consulates during the Bush years, and numerous other such attacks have happened under recent presidents.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/09/14/krauthammer-whitewashes-bushs-history-to-bash-o/189890

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
2. They cannot be allowed to get away with this
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 03:23 PM
Oct 2012

It is shameless. Fuck them.

Embassies, bin Laden, and - look, I know this is not one President Obama should touch - but 9/11 itself. Pretty fucking conclusive that they didn't pay enough credence to security briefings prior to that atrocity, isn't it? I'm not someone who thinks that they intentionally ignored that, or Bush, Cheney and whoever engineered it - I just don't believe that to be the case, and it is not an accusation I feel should be made without irrefutably stone cold evidence. Fact is, however, that they fucked up.

They fucked up on defence and foreign policy far more than this administration can be accused of doing.

It's time to get tough - If anyone can be tough and eloquent, it's Obama at this best. I think he is going to knock the second debate out of the park. Now, I'm a realist and something of a pessimist; if the election were held today, I suspect that Romney would eek out a win. He has the wind behind him, but there's a lot of soft support. That's why Obama took such a nosedive after one listless debate.

A lot of soft support, but support that, nevertheless, has shown that it is more receptive to President Obama and the Democratic party when it is one form and on message. As we speak, expectations are low for the second round, but despite the fact that I'm a bag of nerves - my hands are freezing cold as I type this, I'm barely sleeping, barely eating, until I get so hungry that I binge - but I have a feeling. A feeling that he is going to do something remarkable next Tuesday.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Next time a Republican br...