Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:12 AM Oct 2012

Nicholas Kristof : 'What's at stake in this election? Lives like my old roommate's fighting cancer'

Nicholas Kristof ?@NickKristof
Want to know what's at stake in this election? Lives like my old roommate's, now fighting cancer http://nyti.ms/Ou087c

{snip}

_____ Let’s just stipulate up front that Scott blew it. Other people are sometimes too poor to buy health insurance or unschooled about the risks. Scott had no excuse. He could have afforded insurance, and while working in the pension industry he became expert on actuarial statistics; he knew precisely what risks he was taking. He’s the first to admit that he screwed up catastrophically and may die as a result . . .

The Mitt Romney philosophy, as I understand it, is that this is a tragic but necessary byproduct of requiring Americans to take personal responsibility for their lives. They need to understand that mistakes have consequences. That’s why Romney would repeal Obamacare and leave people like Scott to pay the price for their irresponsibility.

To me, that seems ineffably harsh. We all make mistakes, and a humane government tries to compensate for our misjudgments. That’s why highways have guardrails, why drivers must wear seat belts, why police officers pull over speeders, why we have fire codes. In other modern countries, Scott would have been insured, and his cancer would have been much more likely to be detected in time for effective treatment.
Is that a nanny state? No, it’s a civilized one.

President Obama’s care plan addresses this problem inelegantly, by forcing people like Scott to buy insurance beginning in 2014. Some will grumble about the “mandate” and the insurance cost, but it will save lives.


read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/opinion/sunday/kristof-a-possibly-fatal-mistake.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0&pagewanted=print

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nicholas Kristof : 'What's at stake in this election? Lives like my old roommate's fighting cancer' (Original Post) bigtree Oct 2012 OP
damn. what do you call a clock that's right more than twice a day? Viva_La_Revolution Oct 2012 #1
I wondered if anyone here would notice that bigtree Oct 2012 #2
I've never been that down on Kristof. His Third World reporting has often been good. Jim Lane Oct 2012 #3

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
1. damn. what do you call a clock that's right more than twice a day?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:48 AM
Oct 2012

serious question. Kristof is one of those I NEVER used to agree with. Lately his whole tenor has changed. Is he one of those who blows with the wind, or is he actually evolving?

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
2. I wondered if anyone here would notice that
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 12:03 PM
Oct 2012

I'd give him a probationary period, but he's definitely someone to be taken seriously (even if we sometimes disagree with him). Kristof looks to be a serious and thoughtful man who reports according to his convictions. That's something to encourage.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
3. I've never been that down on Kristof. His Third World reporting has often been good.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:20 PM
Oct 2012

He's actually gone to Third World countries that don't have oil, and has reported on things that affect the lives of the people there even there are no American troops around to hook the reader's interest.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nicholas Kristof : 'What'...