General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSmells like desperation+++Koch Industries, other CEOs warn employees of layoffs if Obama is reelecte
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/koch-industries-sends-pro-romney-packet-employees-195709471--election.htmlBy Dylan Stableford, Yahoo! News | The Ticket
Koch Industries, the Wichita, Kan.-based company run by the billionaire Koch brothers, sent a voter information packet to 45,000 employees of its Georgia Pacific subsidiary earlier this month.
In it was a letter, dated Oct. 1, from Koch Industries president Dave Robertson implicitly warning that "many of our more than 50,000 U.S. employees and contractors may suffer the consequences" of voting for President Obama and other Democrats in the 2012 elections, a list of conservative candidates the company's political action committee endorses and a pair of editorials: one, by David Koch, supporting Mitt Romney, and the other, by Charles Koch, condemning Obama.
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)Hell that's what the koch bros. want anyway.
Or here's another idea: Arrest and convict them (the koch's, etc.) for violating USA election laws.
LTR
(13,227 posts)Especially when they're adding to it.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)There is no workable "compromise" with these parasites. They are willing to kill to keep their power, are we willing to die to take it back?
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)Turn their fortune over to the employees, too.
Cha
(297,248 posts)Kochroaches want to take over the world.
mzmolly
(50,993 posts)against this shit.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)letting them know what is happening. simply tell them K*K brothers have threatened employees who vote for President Obama and Dems down ticket.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)I would have my resume out there tomorrow. This is absoulutely letting the employees that they are shit on the bottom of their shoe.
ncav53
(168 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)"federal law bans intimidat[ing], threaten[ing], coerc[ing], or attempt[ing] to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person . . . to vote as he may choose."
http://www.trolp.org/main_pgs/issues/v16n2/Volokh.pdf
RagAss
(13,832 posts)I doubt you're employable anyway.