Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:49 PM Oct 2012

AP: WHY IT MATTERS: Auto bailout


By TOM KRISHER

The issue:

The government bailout of General Motors and Chrysler is one of the most polarizing issues of the presidential campaign. Many Americans wonder why $62 billion in tax dollars went to keeping the two automakers afloat in 2008 and 2009. There's little doubt the bailout saved the automakers and huge numbers of jobs. But there's also little chance the government will get all its money back.

Taxpayers are out about $1 billion on the Chrysler bailout. GM stock is selling for less than half the price needed for the government to recover all of its nearly $50 billion investment.

---


In this photo taken March 30, 2009, file photo General Motors workers view President Barack Obama's talk about the auto industry bailout in Detroit. The government bailout of General Motors and Chrysler is one of the most polarizing issues of the presidential campaign. Many Americans wonder why $62 billion in tax dollars went to keeping the two automakers afloat in 2008 and 2009. There's little doubt the bailout saved the automakers and huge numbers of jobs. But there's also little chance the government will get all its money back. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)



Where they stand:

President Barack Obama often boasts about the bailout's success, saying the decision saved about 1 million jobs at automakers, parts companies and other businesses tied to the industry. That estimate is backed by a 2010 study by the Center for Automotive Research, an industry think tank. Obama doesn't want to sell the government's remaining 500 million GM shares at a huge loss, but also says he's not interested in being a long-term investor or running the company.

Republican Mitt Romney has argued that GM and Chrysler should have been sent into bankruptcy protection without government money to keep the companies running. Instead, he said private loans should have paid for the bankruptcies. But because of the financial crisis and because both companies were bleeding cash, there was no private capital available at the time. Romney advocated government-guaranteed private loans for both companies after bankruptcy and also said the government should back their warranties. He would "responsibly sell" the GM shares but has given no time frame.

---

FULL story at link.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AP: WHY IT MATTERS: Auto bailout (Original Post) Omaha Steve Oct 2012 OP
Romney probably pissed that Bain Capital couldn't buy GM and/or Chrysler. no_hypocrisy Oct 2012 #1
Remember the credit problem in late '08 and '09? There was NO fucking private capital available ... Bozita Oct 2012 #2
OOPS (LINK) Omaha Steve Oct 2012 #3

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
2. Remember the credit problem in late '08 and '09? There was NO fucking private capital available ...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:38 PM
Oct 2012

... to usher GM and Chrysler through a managed bankruptcy. Chrysler stopped leasing vehicles in early July of '08 due to the same financial crunch. Guess what that did to car/truck production.

Mitt Rmoney's *solution* would have led to liquidation, pure and simple. That's some solution.


BTW, Steve, you forgot the link.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AP: WHY IT MATTERS: Auto ...