Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 12:36 AM Oct 2012

Rare Bipartisanship: Both Parties Don't Want Candy Crowley...

http://thepage.time.com/2012/10/14/moderator-role-under-scrutiny-before-the-debate/

In a rare example of political unity, both the Romney and the Obama campaigns have expressed concern to the Commission on Presidential Debates about how the moderator of the Tuesday town hall has publicly described her role, TIME has learned.

While an early October memorandum of understanding between the Obama and Romney campaigns and the bipartisan commission sponsoring the debates suggests CNN‘s Candy Crowley would play a limited role in the Tuesday night session, Crowley, who is not a party to that agreement, has done a series of interviews on her network in which she has suggested she will assume a broader set of responsibilities. As Crowley put it last week, “Once the table is kind of set by the town hall questioner, there is then time for me to say, ‘Hey, wait a second, what about x, y, z?’”

In the view of both campaigns and the Commission, those and other recent comments by Crowley conflict with the language the two campaigns agreed to which delineates a more limited role for the moderator of the town hall debate. The questioning of the two candidates is supposed to be driven by the audience members themselves — likely voters selected by the Gallup Organization. Crowley’s assignment differs from those of the three other debate moderators, who in the more standard format are supposed to lead the questioning and follow up when appropriate. The town hall debate is planned for Tuesday at 9pm ET at Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY.

According to the town hall format language in the agreement, after each audience question and both two-minute responses from the candidates, Obama and Romney are expected to have an additional discussion facilitated by Crowley. Yet her participation is meant to be otherwise limited. As stated in the document: “In managing the two-minute comment periods, the moderator will not rephrase the question or open a new topic….The moderator will not ask follow-up questions or comment on either the questions asked by the audience or the answers of the candidates during the debate or otherwise intervene in the debate except to acknowledge the questioners from the audience or enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments during the 2 minute response period.” The memorandum, which has been obtained by TIME, was signed by lawyers for the two campaigns on October 3, the day of the first presidential debate in Denver.


Now wouldn't we all be crestfallen if Dulce wasn't the moderator?

Discuss...
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rare Bipartisanship: Both Parties Don't Want Candy Crowley... (Original Post) KharmaTrain Oct 2012 OP
Oh happy day...... goclark Oct 2012 #1
Big Bird is far more sophisticated than Candy Crowley flamingdem Oct 2012 #2
she is a repug troll, so not sure what Romney is worried teddy51 Oct 2012 #3
Glad the Obama campaign has spoken up Cha Oct 2012 #4
Can't they just disconnect her microphone? begin_within Oct 2012 #5
replace her with Jon Stewart TeamPooka Oct 2012 #6
I think that's ridiculous! flyguyjake Oct 2012 #7
She doesn't "press" equally or fairly Horse with no Name Oct 2012 #8
+1 JNelson6563 Oct 2012 #9
Agreed oswaldactedalone Oct 2012 #11
She is not going to press Romney for anything. djean111 Oct 2012 #10

Cha

(297,271 posts)
4. Glad the Obama campaign has spoken up
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 02:30 AM
Oct 2012

about Crowley... and I, like others, am not sure what the mitt campaign is concerned about candy crowley for?

 

begin_within

(21,551 posts)
5. Can't they just disconnect her microphone?
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 02:34 AM
Oct 2012

Let her talk all she wants, as long as it doesn't get into the feed.

 

flyguyjake

(492 posts)
7. I think that's ridiculous!
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 03:09 AM
Oct 2012

She should be able to press the candidates for specifics and direct answers. I'm sick and tired and slimy politicians that answer questions with questions and or don't give any freaking details. eg; Mitt the Twit Romney!

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
8. She doesn't "press" equally or fairly
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 03:18 AM
Oct 2012

She was a despicable choice...but with the town hall format, it was not to be about "her" or "her" choices or questions. We don't need her partisan ass sucking up time that could be utilized by REAL people asking REAL questions.

oswaldactedalone

(3,491 posts)
11. Agreed
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 06:54 AM
Oct 2012

She is vile. Her rotten attitude toward anything Democratic makes me sick and I refused long ago to watch her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rare Bipartisanship: Both...