Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rdking647

(5,113 posts) Mon Oct 15, 2012, 05:06 PM Oct 2012

Koch brothers say vote for rmoney or else

http://bottomline.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/15/14454865-koch-brothers-to-workers-vote-for-romney-or-suffer-the-consequences?lite

personally I think the US goverment should be banned from doing any business with a koch brother owned company

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Koch brothers say vote for rmoney or else (Original Post) rdking647 Oct 2012 OP

That doesn't reflect very well on Republicans. greatauntoftriplets Oct 2012 #1

how will they know who voted for who? madrchsod Oct 2012 #2

We can't let them pretend that personal income tax rates effect corporate hiring decisions Taitertots Oct 2012 #3

greatauntoftriplets

(175,735 posts)

1. That doesn't reflect very well on Republicans.

Reply to rdking647 (Original post)

Mon Oct 15, 2012, 05:08 PM

Oct 2012

They have to coerce people to vote for Rmoney? What malarkey and extremely anti the American way.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)

2. how will they know who voted for who?

Reply to rdking647 (Original post)

Mon Oct 15, 2012, 05:48 PM

Oct 2012

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)

3. We can't let them pretend that personal income tax rates effect corporate hiring decisions

Reply to rdking647 (Original post)

Mon Oct 15, 2012, 06:14 PM

Oct 2012

The rich are trying to spite us for making them pay taxes.

There is even an argument that could be made that higher corporate taxes don't really hamper hiring. The decision to hire more employees is based on the profitability of additional workers, not the tax paid on their production.

Reply to this discussion