General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, since some polls indicate Romney over Obama on the economy,
why haven't we been hammering home what an abysmal job he did as Governor? Aren't there numbers showing he was a disaster economy-wise?
And they've got to nail him on "saving" the Olympics and make it known that the Federal
Government ponied up, essentially, "bailout" money.
Romney's been allowed to tout his impeccable and oh, so impressive financial and gubernatorial credentials without any consequences. The silence and lack of response indicate that his account of his stellar past is accurate.
What's up with that!?!?!?
limousineliberal
(55 posts)We need to get this to the Obama team. Obama needs to bring this up. Especially in the next debate. Romney was terrible in MA.
gateley
(62,683 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)pledge to never cut SS benefits?
Where's the call for public Financing of Federal elections?
Why aren't they saying "Give us a Democratic Majority and we will give you Universal Single Payer Health CARE"?
I notice they only talk about changes around the margins never attack the causes of the problems.
I believe this is the result of allowing CAPITAL to control our elections.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)gateley
(62,683 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)CBS News/KN/uncommitted voters: who would do better handling economy? 65-34 Romney, down from 71-27 pre debate
@MysteryPollster via Tweetbot for Mac
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/16/1145550/-CBS-snap-poll-Obama-wins
Note, while they tout the 67 percent number, it's actually a drop post debate.
gateley
(62,683 posts)is not an economic/financial wizard.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,662 posts)the first one was on the economy. Foreign policy? Boy, that won't go well for Rmoney!