As we strongly disagree and I don't see movement, can we have a moratorium on Debate #1 threads?

Listen, some of you are very wedded to the notion that Obama's first debate performance was a strategy, or to some notion that he won that debate.

Others (including myself) strongly disagree with both those notions.

I am being restrained by going no further than the above.

Here is my recommendation, in keeping with my third sentence:

CAN WE PLEASE STOP DISCUSSING THAT FUCKING DEBATE?

It serves no purpose and it is going nowhere. No one's mind is being changed and there is no change in that on the horizon.

The things we ALL can agree on is that OBAMA KICKED THAT LIAR'S ASS LAST NIGHT, AND THAT, EVEN BETTER, HE ALLOWED ROMNEY TO EXPOSE HIMSELF AS A PETULANT, PETTY DISRESPECTFUL CHILD.

There are so many positive things to discuss from the second debate.

Discussion of the first debate merely serves to irritate and frustrate us, and as a certain campaign would say, IT KEEPS US MOVING BACKWARDS - NOT FORWARDS.

Discussion of all the lies Mitt told in the first debate and what flip-flopped positions he can be called out on - that serves a purpose.

Discussions of how bad the President was or what a grand strategy the whole thing was - ENOUGH.

I know this sounds bossy, so please understand this is a SUGGESTION.

But I think it's a good one. Let's lay down our weapons on this argument. It's long since passed the point of pointlessness.