Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:38 AM Oct 2012

Why is Mitt Romney so unpopular in his home state of Massachusetts?

Perhaps some natives of that state can explain?

I know that Al Gore lost Tennessee in the presidential race but he was nowhere as unpopular as Mitt is in MA??

Is there something we need to know?

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is Mitt Romney so unpopular in his home state of Massachusetts? (Original Post) kentuck Oct 2012 OP
"Home state" - meh. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #1
Wikipedia lists his residences as geckosfeet Oct 2012 #2
Maybe because they know him best? MoonRiver Oct 2012 #3
That should be a cautionary tale for the rest of the country. greatauntoftriplets Oct 2012 #4
I've been calling him Mitt the Shit for years. unhappycamper Oct 2012 #5
The hidden hard drives = Republican occultism Berlum Oct 2012 #16
I don't know why more people aren't pointing this out... vi5 Oct 2012 #6
The Mittster is a carpetbagger from Michigan Submariner Oct 2012 #7
Agreed! You said it all. Mitt was awful. Luckily, he was FailureToCommunicate Oct 2012 #9
Pretty much sums it all up. Jennicut Oct 2012 #23
There's good reason he was a one term governor C_U_L8R Oct 2012 #8
At the end of his term he was among the least popular Governors in the State Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #10
October Issue of Boston Magazine by Jason Schwartz grammiepammie Oct 2012 #11
It's a good read jsr Oct 2012 #13
Hi grammiepammie...WELCOME to DU... Tikki Oct 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Oct 2012 #12
Ideology NHDEMFORLIFE Oct 2012 #14
If you're talking home state then yes, Mitt isn't very popular in Michigan LynneSin Oct 2012 #15
Lying sack of shit louis c Oct 2012 #18
It's like this WilliamPitt Oct 2012 #19
I am from MA and lived there during the Romney years. yewberry Oct 2012 #20
Posted earlier GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #21
So please don't forget Dr. Kerry Healey, PhD N/T BlueInPhilly Oct 2012 #22
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
1. "Home state" - meh.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:49 AM
Oct 2012

He doesn't live here other than on an occasional basis and never really did. Oh and he was a shitty and unpopular governor.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
2. Wikipedia lists his residences as
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:51 AM
Oct 2012

Belmont MA
Wolfboro NH
San Diego CA

Mitt Romney, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He is not expected to win any one of those states.

The fact that he was elected governor of MA at one point is a sad chapter in the states history.
Governorship of Mitt Romney, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It didn't work then - it won't work now
Politifact: Recent statements involving Mitt Romney (For what it's worth)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
5. I've been calling him Mitt the Shit for years.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:57 AM
Oct 2012

I was embarrassed when he was elected Gov; I was embarrassed while he was pulling his crap in the State House, and I was embarrassed when he bought all the hard drives his administration used when he cleared out of MA. I wonder what all that was about?

Willard is right about one thing though: In MA you either work with Democrats or you don't get shit done.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
16. The hidden hard drives = Republican occultism
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:18 AM
Oct 2012

Republicans are totally into the occult.

They have a lot to hide, and they are diligent about hiding it from the honest citizens of the USA.

Republican occultism is a curse upon America.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
6. I don't know why more people aren't pointing this out...
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:57 AM
Oct 2012

As you pointed out, remember when people couldn't snark enough about Al Gore losing his home state? Although given how the Republican party doesn't seem to care any more about flip flopping (which was horrible when Kerry supposedly did it), and draft dodging (horrible for Clinton, not so for Bush), and bullying, condescending debate tactics (again, bad when Gore supposedly did it, but great for Mitt), consistency isn't something I'd count on from any of them.

Submariner

(12,504 posts)
7. The Mittster is a carpetbagger from Michigan
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:00 AM
Oct 2012

who went to school here, went after a high profile senator-ship (lost to Teddy K) and a high profile governorship only as a stepping stone to the WH. Mitt served for about 18 months and then spent the next 2 1/2 years on the road campaigning for president, all the while bashing the state of MA as a liberal dumping ground.

He ran up the state fees for everything, making it very expensive to go to state colleges and left the state with about $1.8 billion debt, and 47th out of 50 in job creation. He sucked as governor.

I called Governor Patrick's office Monday and left message with assistant requesting that Patrick call his good friend Obama and fill him in on how sucky a governor Mitt was so it can be used in 3rd debate.

We had an influx of right wing yuppies during the 80s which is why shit heads like Mitt and centerfold Scottie can elected here now.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
9. Agreed! You said it all. Mitt was awful. Luckily, he was
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:25 AM
Oct 2012

off campaigning for the second half of his term so he didn't do as much damage as he might have - which was a lot. AND he took all evidence of his ineptitude with him. The stolen state hard drives are locked away in a vault with his taxes, or burnt to a crisp at the bottom of some canyon in Utah.
Now we just have to dump Brown and we'll be able to hold our heads up again.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
23. Pretty much sums it all up.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:28 AM
Oct 2012

CT has it's share of right wing yuppies as well, which is why Linda McMahon even has a chance here.

All I ever heard about Mitt from my friends in Mass was that he sucked as a Governor.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
8. There's good reason he was a one term governor
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:03 AM
Oct 2012

Mitt Romney really sucked at the job...
totally phoning it in while consuming
his time with presidential plans.
There's no way he would
have been reelected.
As the Chimp said... fool us once.


 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. At the end of his term he was among the least popular Governors in the State
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:27 AM
Oct 2012

his approval rating was 48th out of 50 Governors.

grammiepammie

(59 posts)
11. October Issue of Boston Magazine by Jason Schwartz
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:08 AM
Oct 2012

When you have a moment and would like to read an interesting article, go to Boston Magazine, Jason Schwartz, Mass Revolt and Romney. My first time on DU, but have enjoyed it for many years. Hope this helps.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
13. It's a good read
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:16 AM
Oct 2012
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/2012/09/mass-revolt-mitt-romney-campaign-in-massachusetts/
Mass Revolt
Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts just six years ago. Today he’s so unpopular here he’s barely bothering to campaign in the state. There are reasons for that—and they could spell doom for his presidential campaign.
By Jason Schwartz
Boston Magazine, October 2012

Tikki

(14,557 posts)
17. Hi grammiepammie...WELCOME to DU...
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:30 AM
Oct 2012
Glad you started posting and thanks for the head's up on the article.



Tikki

Response to kentuck (Original post)

NHDEMFORLIFE

(489 posts)
14. Ideology
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:16 AM
Oct 2012

The guy ran as a moderate in 1994 against EMK and for governor. He pretty much had to at least lean moderate as governor. In his run for president he has been a red-meat conservative.
There really aren't a ton of those in the Commonwealth, though the ones who do live there are nastier than most - if that is possible!

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
18. Lying sack of shit
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:33 AM
Oct 2012

I'm a union guy. i worked on legislation in the Mass. legislature, mostly the expanded gaming bill.

Initially, Romney was in favor of putting slot machines at the racetracks, one of which I work at and represent. In 2007, when he was trying to get the Evangelical vote in Iowa, he was asked about expanded gambling in Massachusetts. It seems that the right wing, Christian Coalition is dead set against expanded gambling. Mitt changed his mind and promised to veto any such legislation.

Mitt ran in 2002 as a blank slate. My father, who worked for Ed Brooke in the 60's and 70's was a fan of George Romney. George was very moderate and a supporter of civil rights. I didn't support Mitt Romney in 2002, as I am a Democrat and a union guy, but I didn't think at the time, he'd be so bad. I thought he'd govern as most of the moderate Republicans had in the past, Volpe, Sargent, Weld and that Mitt Romney held beliefs like my dad's friend Ed Brooke and his dad, George Romney.

As it turns out, Mitt was a fraud, a liar, an opportunist and someone who can't be trusted on his word, ever.

Mitt Romney will be the worst President since James Buchanan if he is ever elected.

God, please save us from this man.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
19. It's like this
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:38 AM
Oct 2012

1. Statewide, in national elections. Massachusetts votes Democratic. I can't remember the last Republican who carried the state in a presidential election. I think Reagan in 1984, someone can check me on that.

BUT

2. Before Deval Patrick, we had 16 years of GOP governors, including Mitt. Two reasons for this: a) The Dem bench was pretty light on good statewide candidates, but more importantly b) Everyone in MA re-elects their own state Reps and Senators even if they are crooked bastards, and hates the other Reps/Senators from other districts for being crooked bastards...so when a Dem Rep/Senator runs for governor, most of the state already doesn't like them. The State House is not filled with popular people (except in their own districts), so they have not fared well in statewide races. That left an opening for the GOP to run moderate Republicans and win; for a time, in the late 8os and 90s, the GOP looked at MA as an incubator for creating nationally palatable GOP presidential candidates: Republican, but moderate enough to appeal to independents and some Democrats. Mitt was, and remains, one of those experiments.

As to your specific question, Mitt was also a pretty lackluster governor. But he's getting killed in this election because MA votes Democratic in presidential elections.

yewberry

(6,530 posts)
20. I am from MA and lived there during the Romney years.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:05 AM
Oct 2012

As others have said, he was a carpetbagger. He never wanted to govern, he wanted to win the title so that he'd have the creds to run for president, which he spent the second half of his tenure as governor doing.

He was not a good governor, and he ran around the country, parroting the 'liberal Massachusetts' meme, insulting his state and his constituents while dismantling social services.

&feature=player_embedded

11 minutes, but reflects the feeling of New Englanders that I know.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Mitt Romney so unp...