Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:49 AM Oct 2012

Richard A. Clarke: Romney on Libya: Just shameful

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/romney-libya-shameful-article-1.1185889


Romney on Libya: Just shameful
Playing politics on national security
By Richard A. Clarke / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Published: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 4:39 PM
Updated: Thursday, October 18, 2012, 4:36 AM


snip//


Why is the attack on Bengahzi being talked about so much? It is not because the Republicans have a long record of caring about embassy security. House Republicans cut $128 million in fiscal year 2011 and an additional $331 million in fiscal year 2012 from what Secretary of State Clinton requested for embassy security.

No, it’s because their polling and focus groups show that voters believe that President Obama has done a very good job fighting terrorists. Therefore, the Rove theory says, you attack Obama on terrorism.


Every President since Ronald Reagan has suffered American casualties to terrorism on his watch. Obama has suffered far fewer than his predecessors, largely because he has kept the terrorist groups off balance by relentlessly attacking them. He has largely eliminated Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an effective fighting force. His use of drones and special forces has been aggressive and successful, including in Yemen and Somalia.

Mitt Romney seems fixated on why Washington did not know with better clarity and sooner what went on during a terrorist attack. It is the kind of question that comes from someone who has no experience dealing with terrorism crisis management or, indeed, combat.

snip//

The Accountability Review Board appointed by Clinton is led by Ambassador Tom Pickering, who served Republican and Democratic Presidents in a record eight ambassadorial jobs. He is aided by Adm. Mike Mullen, who was America’s top military commander. Anyone who really cares about what happened will await their report and will not interfere with their work by politicizing the issue.

But expect Romney to raise it again in the next debate, because what he really cares about is trying to put a dent in Obama’s outstanding performance on terrorism. When he does, ask yourself which man would you want calling the shots against Al Qaeda.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Richard A. Clarke: Romney on Libya: Just shameful (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2012 OP
Romney is just so petty and small-minded! Light63 Oct 2012 #1
K & R AzDar Oct 2012 #2
It's Repugnant. He was trying to make political hay out of it before it was even completely over dballance Oct 2012 #3

Light63

(233 posts)
1. Romney is just so petty and small-minded!
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:07 AM
Oct 2012

And so is the Republican base. All they care about is using whatever ways and methods, regardless how illogical, absurd and heartless, to achieve what they want. When more than 3000 peoples died from the September 11 catastrophe on US' soil, did they come out and blame the then-President Bush?

Definitely, Romney is NOT QUALIFIED to be the POTUS.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
3. It's Repugnant. He was trying to make political hay out of it before it was even completely over
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:15 AM
Oct 2012

Hillary and Obama have proven what serious and sincere public servants they are. They both stood up and said they were responsible and they will take responsibility. This during an election year for the President. He didn't try to worm out of it by blaming underlings and he didn't even point out the GOP cutting the budget for state department's security. He just said "I'm the President, I take responsibility."

THAT is what a man of character does.

I'd bet dollars to donuts Romney would have fired his Sec. of State by now and blamed him (i say him because I don't really expect Romney to appoint many women. I think he left his binders in MA.). He does like firing people who do things for him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Richard A. Clarke: Romne...