General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRichard A. Clarke: Romney on Libya: Just shameful
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/romney-libya-shameful-article-1.1185889Romney on Libya: Just shameful
Playing politics on national security
By Richard A. Clarke / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Published: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 4:39 PM
Updated: Thursday, October 18, 2012, 4:36 AM
snip//
Why is the attack on Bengahzi being talked about so much? It is not because the Republicans have a long record of caring about embassy security. House Republicans cut $128 million in fiscal year 2011 and an additional $331 million in fiscal year 2012 from what Secretary of State Clinton requested for embassy security.
No, its because their polling and focus groups show that voters believe that President Obama has done a very good job fighting terrorists. Therefore, the Rove theory says, you attack Obama on terrorism.
Every President since Ronald Reagan has suffered American casualties to terrorism on his watch. Obama has suffered far fewer than his predecessors, largely because he has kept the terrorist groups off balance by relentlessly attacking them. He has largely eliminated Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an effective fighting force. His use of drones and special forces has been aggressive and successful, including in Yemen and Somalia.
Mitt Romney seems fixated on why Washington did not know with better clarity and sooner what went on during a terrorist attack. It is the kind of question that comes from someone who has no experience dealing with terrorism crisis management or, indeed, combat.
snip//
The Accountability Review Board appointed by Clinton is led by Ambassador Tom Pickering, who served Republican and Democratic Presidents in a record eight ambassadorial jobs. He is aided by Adm. Mike Mullen, who was Americas top military commander. Anyone who really cares about what happened will await their report and will not interfere with their work by politicizing the issue.
But expect Romney to raise it again in the next debate, because what he really cares about is trying to put a dent in Obamas outstanding performance on terrorism. When he does, ask yourself which man would you want calling the shots against Al Qaeda.
Light63
(233 posts)And so is the Republican base. All they care about is using whatever ways and methods, regardless how illogical, absurd and heartless, to achieve what they want. When more than 3000 peoples died from the September 11 catastrophe on US' soil, did they come out and blame the then-President Bush?
Definitely, Romney is NOT QUALIFIED to be the POTUS.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)Hillary and Obama have proven what serious and sincere public servants they are. They both stood up and said they were responsible and they will take responsibility. This during an election year for the President. He didn't try to worm out of it by blaming underlings and he didn't even point out the GOP cutting the budget for state department's security. He just said "I'm the President, I take responsibility."
THAT is what a man of character does.
I'd bet dollars to donuts Romney would have fired his Sec. of State by now and blamed him (i say him because I don't really expect Romney to appoint many women. I think he left his binders in MA.). He does like firing people who do things for him.