Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Declaring Something An Act Of Terror Does Not Necessarily Mean You Are Declaring It A Terror Attack (Original Post) highplainsdem Oct 2012 OP
Megyn Kelly is an idiot. C_U_L8R Oct 2012 #1
That's like decalring titaniumsalute Oct 2012 #2
What!?????? The Wielding Truth Oct 2012 #3
earth to Kelly, I had to endure the shrub years politicaljack78 Oct 2012 #4
I posted a similar fictional quote yesterday. louis-t Oct 2012 #5
right on. we had to live this nonsense. politicaljack78 Oct 2012 #12
Idiots are reaching because Romney got pwned. CakeGrrl Oct 2012 #6
In other words Aerows Oct 2012 #7
At what point do these people begin to feel ashamed of themselves? Dem2TheCore Oct 2012 #8
The fact that people are paid to say such nonsense is an indictment of our political/economic system reformist2 Oct 2012 #9
Megyn Kelly Aerows Oct 2012 #10
"Acts of terror are essentially...benign"? She said that? Really? Mister Ed Oct 2012 #15
No, I was playing Aerows Oct 2012 #17
Megyn Kelly; declaring something about a Cat of Terror chowder66 Oct 2012 #11
i shut an idiot up yesterday trying to make this claim Solomon Oct 2012 #13
Oh FFS .. GeorgeGist Oct 2012 #14
Megyn Kelly bongbong Oct 2012 #16

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
2. That's like decalring
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:28 PM
Oct 2012

that an act of taking a shit does not necessarily mean you are declaring that a shit has been taken.

What are these people smoking?

If the event was an ACT OF TERROR what made it that way?

A. They all played cards and drank some Beer
B. They decided to watch the BIG game on the new flat screen
C. Terrorists shot and killed people

Ok, time is running out. DING DING DING. It must be B. to a Fox news employee.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
3. What!??????
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:31 PM
Oct 2012

What is she talking about? War is Peace. An act of terror is not a terror attack?!???? What is it then??? And Romney can lie his butt off about everything and our Pres, says the truth and it is construed to mean the opposite?!!!


Please FOX needs to be held accountable for propaganda and misleading the nation!

politicaljack78

(312 posts)
12. right on. we had to live this nonsense.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:43 PM
Oct 2012

Kind of makes you wonder about that bubble feedback loop Rachel Maddow was speaking about last night.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
10. Megyn Kelly
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:40 PM
Oct 2012

"Acts of terror are essentially a benign confrontation, whereas a terrorist attack is something completely different."

Mister Ed

(5,934 posts)
15. "Acts of terror are essentially...benign"? She said that? Really?
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 05:08 PM
Oct 2012

Excuse me while I pick my jaw up off the floor.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
17. No, I was playing
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 05:09 PM
Oct 2012

with her "Pepper spray is essentially a food product" line when that guy squirted all of those college students down with pepper spray. She claimed it was essentially a food product and a meme was born.

chowder66

(9,070 posts)
11. Megyn Kelly; declaring something about a Cat of Terror
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:43 PM
Oct 2012

does not necessarily mean you are declaring it a Terror Cat.

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
13. i shut an idiot up yesterday trying to make this claim
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:45 PM
Oct 2012

by responding with "I guess it depends on what your definition of is is."

He got the point and got a cheap look on his face.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Declaring Something...