They refuse to look at the facts.

Yeah, I'd go with that

Is there a poll showing this?

The guy is like christmas in August. Where to start?

....Troll Pest Control. The cooler temps must be driving them indoors.

Why is Obama kicking his ass in the polls in Massachusetts?

Great governor my ass:

Here are five facts about the Massachusetts economy from Romney’s 2003-2007 tenure:

1) Ranked 47th in job growth: Despite Romney’s professed expertise in creating jobs, Massachusetts ranked 47th in job growth during his time as governor. The state’s total job growth was just 0.9 percent, well behind other high-wage, high-skill economies in New York (2.7), California (4.7), and North Carolina (7.6). The national average, meanwhile, was better than 5 percent.

2) Suffered the second-largest labor force decline in the nation: Only Louisiana, which was ravaged by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, saw a bigger decline in its labor force than Massachusetts during Romney’s tenure as governor. The US Census Bureau estimated that between July 2002 and July 2006, 222,000 more residents left Massachusetts for other states than came to it. That decline largely explains the state’s decreasing unemployment rate (from 5.6 to 4.7 percent) while Romney was in office, according to Northeastern University economics professor Andrew Sum. At the same time, the nation as a whole added 8 million people to the labor force.

3) Lost 14 percent of its manufacturing jobs: Massachusetts lost 14 percent of its manufacturing jobs during Romney’s time in office, according to Sum. The loss was double the rate that the nation as a whole lost manufacturing jobs. In 2004, Romney vetoed legislation that would have banned companies doing business with the state from outsourcing jobs to other countries.

4) Experienced “below average” economic growth and was “often near the bottom”: “There was not one measure where the state did well under his term in office. We were below average and often near the bottom,” Sum told the Washington Post in February. As a result, the state was more comparable to Rust Belt states like Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio than it was to other high-tech economies it typically competes with.

Rest of article:
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/938152/5_facts_about_the_massachusetts_economy_under_mitt_romney

Please proceed, GusFring. We'd love to see your facts backing up your assertion.

but I get the feeling the facts don't mean much to some people.

So, where is your evidence that he was a good governor?

Not mentioning any of them.

I'm sure they match up pretty perfectly.

Thanks for setting us all straight.

That Alternet article has been up since July

and why they want him back for another term.

But you're point is right on - Romney's miserable record there should be front and center.