Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:19 AM Oct 2012

Denver Post endorsement: Barack Obama for president

Barack Obama for president

With the nation mired in two wars and amid an economic meltdown, we endorsed a largely untested young senator from Illinois for president in 2008.

Four years later, the Iraq war is over, the war in Afghanistan has a conclusion in sight, and the economy has made demonstrable — though hardly remarkable — progress.

As President Barack Obama campaigns for re-election, it would be a stretch to say we are bullish on the entirety of his first term. There have been notable accomplishments: rescuing the nation's auto industry, passing comprehensive (though contentious) health-care reform, and delivering justice to Osama bin Laden. But those accomplishments are juxtaposed against a sluggish economy and less impressive performances in tackling the federal debt and deficits, reducing unemployment and bolstering the housing market.

A largely intransigent Republican Party shares in the blame, however, particularly because of unwillingness to cede any ground to Obama in the last two years on policies — such as the president's American Jobs Act — that attempt to bolster the economy.

- more -

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_21804862/editorial-barack-obama-president
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Denver Post endorsement: Barack Obama for president (Original Post) ProSense Oct 2012 OP
Denver Post said no to Amendment 64. They're wrong. Panasonic Oct 2012 #1
Guess I'm keeping my subscription ethellamyers Oct 2012 #2
 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
1. Denver Post said no to Amendment 64. They're wrong.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:23 AM
Oct 2012

Remember, the original ban of cannabis was started by Hearst - as an effort to use newspaper from anything but hemp.

ethellamyers

(20 posts)
2. Guess I'm keeping my subscription
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:29 AM
Oct 2012

Both sides seem to dislike The Post and accuse them of rooting for the other side.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Denver Post endorsement: ...