Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gateley

(62,683 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 01:49 PM Jan 2012

"Working Poor. If you're working, you shouldn't be poor." Tavis Smiley on MSNBC. nt

Last edited Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:47 PM - Edit history (2)

VERY LATE EDIT, WITH APOLOGIES:

His meaning was that there shouldn't BE any "working poor". That those who work deserve a good wage that lifts them above poverty.

I thought coming from Tavis Smiley it would be apparent, but I apologize for just posting that snippet and not offering an explanation.

EDIT #2 -- Jesus, as though tossing his statement w/out explanation out there wasn't bad enough, I typed TRAVIS Smiley.


45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Working Poor. If you're working, you shouldn't be poor." Tavis Smiley on MSNBC. nt (Original Post) gateley Jan 2012 OP
So out of touch! liberal N proud Jan 2012 #1
No, think a minute.... izquierdista Jan 2012 #2
Minimum wage is not a way out of poverty JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #10
That's what he was saying -- there shouldn't BE any "working poor" - people should get gateley Jan 2012 #23
I have no idea who Tavis Smiley is. Quantess Jan 2012 #25
Well that explains it! gateley Jan 2012 #32
I think you misunderstood what he meant. It's clearer on his Facebook page: highplainsdem Jan 2012 #5
Thanks. emilyg Jan 2012 #6
THANKS!!!! I had read that totally wrong. Zalatix Jan 2012 #7
Thanking you, too! Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #16
I did liberal N proud Jan 2012 #34
People who are working should be working for a living wage MrScorpio Jan 2012 #3
because a living wage would reduce the filthy, fucking rich to only yodermon Jan 2012 #8
+1 redqueen Jan 2012 #12
Please, won't you think about the plight of the uber-wealthy? Hugabear Jan 2012 #18
Agreed - I misunderstood the op liberal N proud Jan 2012 #35
Sums it up quite nicely, I think. Brickbat Jan 2012 #4
Exactly. If you work, you should be able to afford to live in a manner that allows glowing Jan 2012 #9
Hey numbnuts. Try working for $8.50/hr part time and say that. hobbit709 Jan 2012 #11
I think his meaning didn't get through. From upthread: redqueen Jan 2012 #13
If you've ever listened to his radio show with Dr. Cornel West, you'd understand Smiley's remark riderinthestorm Jan 2012 #14
Thank you. Wish I would have included that in my OP! I feel so bad that I may have gateley Jan 2012 #28
Please read my edit in OP -- lots of misinterpretation as to his meaning and I'm sorry for that. gateley Jan 2012 #26
Why are you sorry? izquierdista Jan 2012 #41
Why "nt"? Gold Metal Flake Jan 2012 #15
Because I thought most of those here would be familiar with Smiley and know that his gateley Jan 2012 #30
Hell, bother, I'm not even on my timeline. Gold Metal Flake Jan 2012 #36
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing about spending time elsewhere. It gets tiresome at gateley Jan 2012 #38
It's easy to misinterpret the context of the OP. Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #17
Sigh. nt gateley Jan 2012 #31
Certainly you must understand the confusion. Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #33
Obviously I didn't think it through before I posted, and when I saw (and un the confusion I tried to gateley Jan 2012 #37
Minimum wage should be eliminated. Hatchling Jan 2012 #19
+1,000 highplainsdem Jan 2012 #21
Oh dear. That opens a hornets nest. Without a specific figure the issue of what a living wage is jwirr Jan 2012 #24
He didn't mention Minimum Wage. His point was that people who work should be paid fairly. nt gateley Jan 2012 #27
Damn right, and I don't know why people don't understand that concept. Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #40
i tend to suppport mr smiley and what he says and i do now dembotoz Jan 2012 #20
BUTBUTBUT WE CAN'T PUNISH SUCCESS!!!!111!!!11 ELEVENS! pansypoo53219 Jan 2012 #22
Please go back and read my edits -- My fault, but this has been misunderstood and I don't gateley Jan 2012 #29
Perfect etherealtruth Jan 2012 #39
Tavis, put your money where your mouth is... Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #42
Tavis Smiley, todays #1 out of touch douche bag. sarcasmo Jan 2012 #43
Are you being sarcasmo or did you not understand my clarifications of the OP? nt gateley Jan 2012 #45
Reason # 472 to Know Your Liberal Talk Hosts Tsiyu Jan 2012 #44

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,341 posts)
10. Minimum wage is not a way out of poverty
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:05 PM
Jan 2012

Especially if minimum wage is payed for fewer than 40 hours, and the employer doesn't provide health insurance.

That ends my minute of thinking for the day.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
23. That's what he was saying -- there shouldn't BE any "working poor" - people should get
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:34 PM
Jan 2012

a good wage.

I guess I should have explained but I assumed (I know, I know) that people would understand it, coming from Smiley.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
25. I have no idea who Tavis Smiley is.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:36 PM
Jan 2012

I never watch American TV anymore except the snippets that Colbert & Stewart make jokes about.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
32. Well that explains it!
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:03 PM
Jan 2012

From Wiki:

Tavis Smiley... is a talk show host, author, liberal political commentator, entrepreneur, advocate and philanthropist. /snip

Smiley was then offered a chance to host a radio talk show on National Public Radio. He served as host of The Tavis Smiley Show on NPR until December 2004 when he announced that he would be leaving his NPR show, citing the network's inability to reach a more diverse audience.[38] Smiley launched a weekly version of his radio program The Tavis Smiley Show on April 29, 2005, distributed by NPR rival Public Radio International. On October 1, 2010, Tavis Smiley turned the second hour of his PRI program into Smiley & West co-hosted by his longtime collaborator Dr. Cornel West. Smiley also hosts Tavis Smiley, a late night talk show televised on the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) network and produced in association with WNET in New York. /snip

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tavis_Smiley

/Users/ibookg3owner/Desktop/Tavis_Smiley.jpg

highplainsdem

(48,984 posts)
5. I think you misunderstood what he meant. It's clearer on his Facebook page:
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jan 2012
https://www.facebook.com/TavisTalks/posts/10150408710551278

Tavis Smiley
Too many American corporations are sitting on record profits here at home and sending more American jobs abroad. “The working poor” is the phrase I hate most. If you work in America, you ought not be poor!
Like · Comment · October 13, 2011 at 10:00am via HootSuite ·

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
3. People who are working should be working for a living wage
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jan 2012

A wage that can afford someone to raise a family

But we've lost our way as a nation over these last many years.

More and more workers are finding themselves poorer and poorer every year.

For a better America, people who work should never be poor.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
8. because a living wage would reduce the filthy, fucking rich to only
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jan 2012

filthy rich, and therefore is communist.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
18. Please, won't you think about the plight of the uber-wealthy?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:55 PM
Jan 2012

If every company had to pay a legitimate living wage, then how would these CEO's and other big-wings be able to afford their luxury yachts, mega-mansions, European luxury cars, etc?

You wouldn't want them to have to dip into their savings and "investments", would you?

It's all about me, me, me with these working poor types.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
9. Exactly. If you work, you should be able to afford to live in a manner that allows
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:04 PM
Jan 2012

for housing, utilities, a savings account, and a 2 or 3 week vacation with the family every year. Why is anyone who is toiling for any company poor? Aren't we supposed to be the Greatest Nation? What Nation in their right mind, unless they are dictating asshole countries, would want to look to the United States and its "democracy" as a model to follow when our model works you until you die for what? What are we working for?.. To choose between food and electricity this month?

That's the biggest question I always come back to... What are we working so hard for? Are we actually producing any worthwhile betterment to humanity? Are we actually creating anything pertinent? What are we working crappy jobs that pay shit, for? That question and the actuality of living life toiling away, struggling to pay to afford to live, is why so many people are depressed and/ or use drugs to numb the reality of the fact that most of us are working for and towards nothing and that Dreams are unattainable and that the jobs we are working, for the most part, are mind-numbingly dull and that you will be working one of these types of jobs until you probably die.. since the politicians are destroying any vestige of a safety net at the end of our lives. Retire? WTF is that?

My real hope lies in the world awakening... Occupy is a great force, and I hope Spring comes back with a vengeance. I'm ready to... I think many are ready to as well.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
14. If you've ever listened to his radio show with Dr. Cornel West, you'd understand Smiley's remark
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:11 PM
Jan 2012

Smiley is a tireless crusader for societal justice (as is West) and while his phraseology has lost something without the context, he basically means that if you have a job it should be paying you a decent wage - enough to NOT be poor!

He's been a huge supporter of the Occupy movements and is no friend to the corporate raiding of our civil society.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
28. Thank you. Wish I would have included that in my OP! I feel so bad that I may have
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:46 PM
Jan 2012

painted the wrong picture!

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
41. Why are you sorry?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:29 PM
Jan 2012

G%dD@^^!), but there are some dense people on this board as of late. But maybe that is a good sign. It means that the CPPOOABWTIWOTH* crowd is abandoning the Repubs.




*[font size = 1]Can't pour piss out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
15. Why "nt"?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jan 2012

Why did you not include context? Why haven't you updated your post to include the context provided in the comments?

gateley

(62,683 posts)
30. Because I thought most of those here would be familiar with Smiley and know that his
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:52 PM
Jan 2012

statement was supportive of American workers.

If I'd been posting it elsewhere, I may have been more explanatory, but I had faith in DUers to understand what he means.

And, sorry I'm not on your timeline, but I was away from my computer for a while. Sheesh - it's like I'm back in school getting chastised by Mother Superior.

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
36. Hell, bother, I'm not even on my timeline.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jan 2012

But folks in the thread were coming to the wrong conclusions and then I got all DU-ey.


I gotta spend time elsewhere.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
38. Yeah, I was thinking the same thing about spending time elsewhere. It gets tiresome at
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:31 PM
Jan 2012

times.

I love the "all DU-ey"!

Wind Dancer

(3,618 posts)
33. Certainly you must understand the confusion.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:35 PM
Jan 2012

Recently, liberal commentators, journalists, activists, actors, etc. have been ridiculed and attacked on this very forum, including Dr. Cornel West. It was a profound statement by Tavis Smiley and I agree with him completely but without context, it could have easily been misinterpreted.

Fortunately, there were several posts after mine that provided explanation. Thanks for editing the OP and my apologies for causing you frustration.

Sigh!

gateley

(62,683 posts)
37. Obviously I didn't think it through before I posted, and when I saw (and un the confusion I tried to
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:30 PM
Jan 2012

and understood) the confusion I tried to clarify.

And I never gave a thought about him being dissed here -- I'm shocked (and didn't know) that Cornel West had been criticized. Wow -- scary!

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
24. Oh dear. That opens a hornets nest. Without a specific figure the issue of what a living wage is
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:34 PM
Jan 2012

open to discussion. What we need is the minimum wage to be set at a higher standard. On the other hand if companies do not want to pay more then they should support a universal health care program and free education and things like that. What companies have never understood is that these programs have always helped to keep wages lower. The rethugs have now convinced them that government cost too much. We shall see.

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
40. Damn right, and I don't know why people don't understand that concept.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:52 PM
Jan 2012

How could anyone possibly be against a living wage?

pansypoo53219

(20,977 posts)
22. BUTBUTBUT WE CAN'T PUNISH SUCCESS!!!!111!!!11 ELEVENS!
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 03:54 PM
Jan 2012

when is enough money enough? MORE PROFIT SHARING!!!

we need a CEO law to reduce their obcene pay.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
29. Please go back and read my edits -- My fault, but this has been misunderstood and I don't
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:49 PM
Jan 2012

want you to think that was his message.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
44. Reason # 472 to Know Your Liberal Talk Hosts
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:45 PM
Jan 2012


If you know Mr. Smiley's style, you tend to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I will agree the phrasing was awkward. However, I opened the thread expecting to find that he meant what he said - in all the right ways.

"Creating jobs" isn't anything to brag about if those jobs keep others in poverty and shut out from health care.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Working Poor. If yo...