Did he do any such thing? I read that his state had lower employment after his term, and this was not after a major economic disruption of any kind.

and adds 5.1 million jobs in a little under 4 years, President Obama has failed according to Romney. But when Romney takes over a state that was 36th in job creation during a free cash driven economic boom and takes that state to 46th in job creation during the same money driven economic boom, Romney some how inherited a bad situation . When a democrat comes in after Romney and takes the Massachusetts economy to one of the best at creating jobs during one of the most difficult economic environments in history, some how that democrat did that because Romney set the groundwork . What a complete crock of shit and if President Obama and Obama's research team let Romney and his people get a way with that gross lie, I don't know what to say.

And he still sucked

Baffles me.

is that a new ad?

They could run them again. They were great.

Very good ads.

it's clear how much the citizens of Massachusetts appreciate what he did!

one of Mitt's home states that he losing.

r. Here are five facts about the Massachusetts economy from Romney’s 2003-2007 tenure:

1) Ranked 47th in job growth: Despite Romney’s professed expertise in creating jobs, Massachusetts ranked 47th in job growth during his time as governor. The state’s total job growth was just 0.9 percent, well behind other high-wage, high-skill economies in New York (2.7), California (4.7), and North Carolina (7.6). The national average, meanwhile, was better than 5 percent.

2) Suffered the second-largest labor force decline in the nation: Only Louisiana, which was ravaged by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, saw a bigger decline in its labor force than Massachusetts during Romney’s tenure as governor. The US Census Bureau estimated that between July 2002 and July 2006, 222,000 more residents left Massachusetts for other states than came to it. That decline largely explains the state’s decreasing unemployment rate (from 5.6 to 4.7 percent) while Romney was in office, according to Northeastern University economics professor Andrew Sum. At the same time, the nation as a whole added 8 million people to the labor force.

3) Lost 14 percent of its manufacturing jobs: Massachusetts lost 14 percent of its manufacturing jobs during Romney’s time in office, according to Sum. The loss was double the rate that the nation as a whole lost manufacturing jobs. In 2004, Romney vetoed legislation that would have banned companies doing business with the state from outsourcing jobs to other countries.

Rest of article: http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/938152/5_facts_about_the_massachusetts_economy_under_mitt_romney

to ask, I suppose.

then why didn't he run for re-election? Why is Obama leading Romney by far in Massachusetts? Could it be that the people of Massachusetts know him best, and they don't like what they see?