Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vogon_Glory

(9,132 posts)
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:14 PM Oct 2012

Lysistrata 2012! Or Motivating The Lazy Male Youth Vote

I am wondering if this race is tight enough that young female Democratic activists and supporters ought to seriously consider borrowing a tactic from Ancient Greece’s Lysistrata. The Presidential race is very tight, President Obama is barely ahead of Mitt Romney in some polls, behind in others, and could very well lose the race.

For those who don’t know, the Lysistrata of Ancient Greece supposedly organized a large bloc of Greek womanhood into denying sexual favors to their husbands and lovers unless they ended the Peloponnesian War. Lysistrata’s idea of ending the war was very simple: end the war or no more whoopee until it’s over. I’m not suggesting an end to wars (I believe that the Taliban are horrible misogynistic sexists, but that’s a separate discussion), but I am suggesting that Democratic women inspire their husbands and gentlemen friends to get minimally politically active and vote.

Women have a LOT to lose this election. Not only is access to abortion being threatened, but so is access to contraception and tens of millions of poorer womens’ access to reproductive health care, thanks to the unholy alliance between social reactionaries, Ayn Rand fans, and Republican politicians and activists.

Is a Lysistrata action too much to ask? I don’t think so. Let’s be real here. Despite the crest of support that helped President Obama beat John McCain back in 2008, despite the long hours and hard work of many youthful Democratic and progressive activists, the young voter bloc is notorious for proving to be no-shows during early voting and on election day. Maybe the fellers need some motivation.

I am not suggesting no sex until a Democratic President is in the White House. I am, however, floating the idea of a sexual moratorium until November 7th or later unless the guys produce one of those nifty “I have voted” stickers that are widely available at polling stations in Texas and in other places. This needn’t be a sinister action motivated by some secret ringmaster (ringmistress?) at DNC headquarters, just a spontaneous popular action launched from millions of progressive pillows coast-to-coast.

Democratic ladies, what do YOU think?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to Vogon_Glory (Original post)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
2. i dont wish to step back in time, that using sex as a weapon or tool is all a woman has to
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:18 PM
Oct 2012

be convincing the values of voting democratic.

no.

this is stupid and offensive to women. not to mention insulting to men. if i were a man and my woman choose to use blackmail with sex.... well, .... no thanks.

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
3. I wouldn't mind it being used against Republican men.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:52 PM
Oct 2012

JUST KIDDING!!! Yes I would, for the reasons you mentioned.

Seriously, though, I would be in favor of women divorcing Republican men who stand for Romney. (Not wanting to be even in the company of a Republican isn't using sex as a tool.) Or Republican women getting mental help if they can't help but want to vote for Romney...

Vogon_Glory

(9,132 posts)
8. I Think A Few Of Them Could Be Tagged
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 06:46 PM
Oct 2012

I think a few of them could be tagged--male members of the age cohort whom Howard Dean and other Democratic activists registered to vote in Dean's 2004 "Slacker Rebellion" who responded by not bothering to vote in that fall's elections.

Want to know why I decided to post my opening post? I thought of those guys, and their little brothers doubtlessly following in their footsteps, and decided that I really didn't give a flying (bleep) about their comfort zone.

Vogon_Glory

(9,132 posts)
10. I Don't
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 08:26 PM
Oct 2012

I don't. I have little sympathy with youthful non-voters, particularly after the 2004 elections. A two to three week forced side-lining might wise up some of the lazy-@sses who sat on the sidelines and gave us four more years of Dubya back in 2004 and the non-voters in my state who voted in 2008, but punted the game in 2010 and gave my state of Texas over to the tender ministrations of a Tea Party/Republican super-majority in the Texas state legislature.

If they don't like the choices, they can go to a well-stocked grocery store or farmer's market and make do with melons.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lysistrata 2012! Or Motiv...